Author

Topic: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 209. (Read 554387 times)

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Profitability is a bit low today, just worry that maybe the popularity is squeezing the profits? aAlways wondered if there is a sweet spot in terms of hashrate and users, could the influx of miners be causing the lower profits or just a slow day?


Remember, BTC and LTC went on a run price wise today, I'm sure it impacted the markets for altcoins.  Once we get some more sideways movement we may see more earnings.

you make me laugh ryan
newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
Profitability is a bit low today, just worry that maybe the popularity is squeezing the profits? aAlways wondered if there is a sweet spot in terms of hashrate and users, could the influx of miners be causing the lower profits or just a slow day?


Remember, BTC and LTC went on a run price wise today, I'm sure it impacted the markets for altcoins.  Once we get some more sideways movement we may see more earnings.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Profitability is a bit low today, just worry that maybe the popularity is squeezing the profits? aAlways wondered if there is a sweet spot in terms of hashrate and users, could the influx of miners be causing the lower profits or just a slow day?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Hey guys, so I've been looking through the thread and it has been commented several times that I should base the hashrate shown on the site vs my WU on my miner. Is there any way to increase this number? My hashrate is averaging out at 820khash (due to heat reasons) and WU at 750/m. http://imgur.com/AA4LCxt

But on the stats page it is showing that I seldom get above 700 khash accepted. users/1Gz3QtQXTEVTZoSNpzxjrU4fq3mKSAQ5ky
WU is normally about 90% of your KH/s, so by increasing your KH/s you also increase your WU, although different settings will yield different ratio between KH/s and WU - but don't expect it to greatly vary from the 90% mark.
Am I doing something wrong? How can I make my WU reflect my actual hashrate closer?
Any configuration that you do with your miner should revolve around maximizing your WU and not your KH/s, so in a sense, your question is backwards and should be "How can I make my KH/s reflect my actual WU?".
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
It is not to easy to configure all 210 rigs cgminer config to connect directly to this pool.

Maybe try CGRemote it will monitor all your rigs and allow you to switch pools for all or indidual rigs. If I had 210 rigs, that's what I'd use.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
I am not sure what we are mining at the moment or what has changed, but my W/U are 110% of my hash rate, and it has been like this for 20 minutes or more.

Not complaining, just an observation.
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Hey guys, so I've been looking through the thread and it has been commented several times that I should base the hashrate shown on the site vs my WU on my miner. Is there any way to increase this number? My hashrate is averaging out at 820khash (due to heat reasons) and WU at 750/m. http://imgur.com/AA4LCxt

But on the stats page it is showing that I seldom get above 700 khash accepted. users/1Gz3QtQXTEVTZoSNpzxjrU4fq3mKSAQ5ky

Am I doing something wrong? How can I make my WU reflect my actual hashrate closer?
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
Are all the pools dropping in profits today or is Clevermining having problems with the mass influx of new miners?


i dont know aye, what happening with  the pool, was really stable back when i joined when there was 650 users lol  (after 2000 users started to get drop outs etc ) ....either needs fire up alot of new servers in regions or just limit users  till he gets his pool running right /stable.... but of course more users, more profit for him so i don't think he be doing that Sad  

Check out http://poolpicker.eu/

All pools are doing quite badly today.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
Are all the pools dropping in profits today or is Clevermining having problems with the mass influx of new miners?


i dont know aye, what happening with  the pool, was really stable back when i joined when there was 650 users lol  (after 2000 users started to get drop outs etc ) ....either needs fire up alot of new servers in regions or just limit users  till he gets his pool running right /stable.... but of course more users, more profit for him so i don't think he be doing that Sad  
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
Are all the pools dropping in profits today or is Clevermining having problems with the mass influx of new miners?
full member
Activity: 208
Merit: 100
I see a lot of complaining about people asking about high rejection rates, but are we any closer to figuring out if expiry and scan-time really have any effect on reject rates with CM?

In all my experiments with settings, I couldn't seem to find a combination that really made a difference.

Quote from: Kalroth

Also there's a lot of poor and misguided advice on how the expiry, scan-time and queue settings actually influence the rejections you're experiencing.
A lot of these settings were made for HTTP communication and not the much more efficient stratum protocol*.

--expiry
This setting defines how long time it takes before a work share is declared stale.
It is not used on stratum servers, since stratum servers supply it with work shares.
Only exception is when the statrum server is broken, then the setting is used as a fallback value.

Recommendation: Leave at default setting. Server will supply a proper setting.

To verify above simply follow the opt_expiry variable in cgminer.c source file.

--scan-time
This setting defines how long time, in seconds, the client should spend scanning current active work.
Again a setting that is not used on stratum servers, since stratum servers supply it with work shares.
Only exception is when the setting is lower than the server supplied setting, then it'll potentially generate more stale work.

Recommendation: Leave at default setting, which is 30 seconds for scrypt.

To verify above simply follow the opt_scantime variable in cgminer.c source file.

--queue
This setting defines how many work items you minimum got waiting in queue.
It is only relevant to prevent downtime when the stratum server is too slow at serving new work shares.

Recommendation: Leave at default setting, which is 1.

To verify above simply follow the opt_queue variable in cgminer.c source file.

* Stratum mining protocol: http://mining.bitcoin.cz/stratum-mining and https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-stratum-mining-protocol-asic-ready-108533
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
I see a lot of complaining about people asking about high rejection rates, but are we any closer to figuring out if expiry and scan-time really have any effect on reject rates with CM?

In all my experiments with settings, I couldn't seem to find a combination that really made a difference.

Considering mine with vary from 1% to 10% for no apparent reason...

No.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
I see a lot of complaining about people asking about high rejection rates, but are we any closer to figuring out if expiry and scan-time really have any effect on reject rates with CM?

In all my experiments with settings, I couldn't seem to find a combination that really made a difference.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
Probably they are switching to multi region servers Wink

You can read this message on top of home page


Code:
Realtime hashrate graphs will not be reliable in the next hour
We're switching servers and realtime charts will get data only from one of them, so you might see some drop after the switch.
This is only in the realtime charts and your shares are stored into database without problems. This should resolve within an hour.
full member
Activity: 223
Merit: 100
How can I make it work?
It is not to easy to configure all 210 rigs cgminer config to connect directly to this pool.
Thanks. )

It is pretty easy with saltstack for example.
I config rigs that way.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Hi, I have a problem with connection.

I have more than 210 rigs


 Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

probably semi-legal school or work set up
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
 linux gives better hash rates than windows 7?
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
Hi, I have a problem with connection.

I have more than 210 rigs


 Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Hi, I have a problem with connection.

I have more than 210 rigs and I connect it to my private stratum-proxy to connect directly to mining pools - all pools are ok, but when i connect to this one i have a message

Code:
2014-03-03 21:25:01,643 WARNING proxy # Stratum proxy version: 1.5.6

2014-03-03 21:25:01,645 WARNING proxy # Checking for updates...

2014-03-03 21:25:02,001 WARNING proxy # Trying to connect to Stratum pool at us.clevermining.com:3333

2014-03-03 21:25:02,503 WARNING proxy # Authorizing custom user 1NGpVUTvddhmdvJj6WN9R9K8--------, password x

2014-03-03 21:25:02,505 WARNING proxy # -----------------------------------------------------------------------

2014-03-03 21:25:02,505 WARNING proxy # PROXY IS LISTENING ON ALL IPs ON PORT 5555 (stratum) AND 8332 (getwork)

2014-03-03 21:25:02,505 WARNING proxy # -----------------------------------------------------------------------

2014-03-03 21:25:28,172 WARNING protocol # Failed message: list index out of range from 54.200.13.55

2014-03-03 21:25:31,288 WARNING proxy # Authorizing custom user 1NGpVUTvddhmdvJj6WN9R9K8--------, password x

ans etc.

How can I make it work?

It is not to easy to configure all 210 rigs cgminer config to connect directly to this pool.

Thanks. )
full member
Activity: 156
Merit: 100
Hi Terk

My latest payout hasn't reflected in my wallet yet (normally it shows within a few minutes, it's now been 35 minutes) and if I check the TX ID on blockchain.info it says "Transaction not found"

https://blockchain.info/tx/35fe42921b6bca647cae4abad7402ddf1d6434ccbd96b68eca5c3156296d8019

Is this normal, do I just need to wait longer for it to be confirmed, or has something gone wrong somewhere along the lines?

Thanks!

you can check the blockchain here too. https://coinb.in/tx/35fe42921b6bca647cae4abad7402ddf1d6434ccbd96b68eca5c3156296d8019

blockchain . info must be having a bit of a lag.

it'll turn up.. have patient young one..

edit: confirmed issue at blockchain . info http://blockchain-status.com/
Jump to: