Topic: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 218. (Read 554387 times)

congrats CM (terk) broke the 10,000 MHS barrier. i'm sure more will come. hopefully more servers to come online. been getting few remote failures recently.

just a humble suggestion to put up a FAQ on page 1 so that newbies won't keep on repeating same questions.

such as :

why is my reject rate so high on CM compared to other pools ?

terk is working on a fix or already worked on a fix recently. try lowering your xI or intensity & also set queue to 1 in settings in cg/sgminer. be patient & wait a little while. the rejects in cgwatcher counts the untracked stratum so you may see that the reject rate is high.

why am i being paid multiple times ?

it's just how CM works, yes you are paid multiple times per day. imo it's better so that the work i put in does not get stuck ! & goes directly to my wallet for my work. but it would be better if CM could set multiple payments at certain times. i know it's very difficult due to exchanges or sometimes manual trading has to be done.

why no other servers ?

terk is working on it. be patient. atm current server is handling pretty well with the users growing daily.

newbies, please browse & search around. also pls chk your config file, each settings are or could be different for different pools/coins. most likely you will have to reconfigure it.

here's mine on my full time rig 5 x r290 non ref : results below...

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
-o stratum+tcp://us.clevermining.com:3333 -u (your btc add) -p (your choosen password) -g 1 -w 512 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 20481 --xintensity 100 --kernel zuikkis --gpu-powertune 30 --gpu-fan 47-90 --auto-fan --temp-target 80 --temp-overheat 90 --temp-cutoff 95 --gpu-engine 1000 --gpu-memclock 1400

sgminer 4.1.0 - Started: [2014-03-02 09:47:04]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):4.364M (avg):4.376Mh/s | A:135680  R:2560  HW:0  WU:4344.5/m
ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 152  LW: 2309  GF: 0  RF: 0
Connected to Pool 0 (stratum) diff 512 as user
Block: 15de88b2...  Diff:206M  Started: [10:15:39]  Best share: 145K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  80.0C 3400RPM | 877.4K/876.8Kh/s | R:  2.1% HW:0 WU: 784.7/m xI:100
 GPU 1:  79.0C 3761RPM | 877.1K/876.7Kh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU: 745.9/m xI:100
 GPU 2:  80.0C 3212RPM | 873.1K/872.4Kh/s | R:  1.9% HW:0 WU: 878.3/m xI:100
 GPU 3:  80.0C 3499RPM | 875.3K/877.1Kh/s | R:  1.6% HW:0 WU: 974.2/m xI:100
 GPU 4:  79.0C 3035RPM | 876.1K/876.8Kh/s | R:  3.5% HW:0 WU: 961.4/m xI:100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[10:16:37] Accepted 02e75d0b Diff 22.6K/512 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[10:16:44] Accepted 223d9a52 Diff 1.91K/512 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[10:16:45] Accepted 69e02361 Diff 619/512 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[10:16:46] Accepted 4c373fca Diff 860/512 GPU 3 at Pool 0
[10:16:58] Accepted 783846a6 Diff 545/512 GPU 2 at Pool 0
[10:17:16] Accepted 06445308 Diff 10.5K/512 GPU 3 at Pool 0
[10:17:20] Accepted 0ad60ff1 Diff 6.05K/512 GPU 2 at Pool 0
[10:17:23] Accepted 34f8d07c Diff 1.24K/512 GPU 4 at Pool 0
[10:17:36] Accepted 5015199f Diff 818/512 GPU 3 at Pool 0
[10:17:37] Accepted 08d6fc49 Diff 7.41K/512 GPU 4 at Pool 0

my main pc rig same settings as above & results : GPU 0 is slower cos i need to reduce xI to use the PC

GPU 1 is r9 290 & GPU 0,2,3 are R9 290 Tri X non X

sgminer 4.1.0 - Started: [2014-03-02 08:26:44]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):3.230M (avg):3.432Mh/s | A:336896  R:93696  HW:0  WU:3137.0/m
ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 494  LW: 6923  GF: 0  RF: 0
Connected to Pool 0 (stratum) diff 512 as user
Block: 15de88b2...  Diff:206M  Started: [10:15:57]  Best share: 5.55M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  79.0C 2521RPM | 716.4K/798.4Kh/s | R:  6.3% HW:0 WU: 723.4/m xI: 25
 GPU 1:  79.0C 3618RPM | 877.7K/878.2Kh/s | R:  4.3% HW:0 WU: 732.0/m xI:100
 GPU 2:  66.0C 2387RPM | 878.1K/878.8Kh/s | R:  3.4% HW:0 WU: 808.7/m xI:100
 GPU 3:  74.0C 2470RPM | 877.2K/878.8Kh/s | R:  4.7% HW:0 WU: 872.9/m xI:100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[10:18:47] Accepted 1158fa17 Diff 3.78K/512 GPU 3 at Pool 0
[10:18:49] Accepted 74e2f508 Diff 561/512 GPU 2 at Pool 0
[10:19:00] Accepted 2281a6c4 Diff 1.9K/512 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[10:19:05] Accepted 71d57da9 Diff 576/512 GPU 3 at Pool 0
[10:19:16] Accepted 55bd6628 Diff 764/512 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[10:19:16] Accepted 75119abb Diff 560/512 GPU 3 at Pool 0
[10:19:20] Accepted 6ece8916 Diff 591/512 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[10:19:36] Accepted 0b61d231 Diff 5.76K/512 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[10:19:43] Accepted 5bb2029d Diff 715/512 GPU 0 at Pool 0
[10:19:52] Accepted 1e0d4f2c Diff 2.18K/512 GPU 2 at Pool 0

happy mining. looking forward to more improvement on CM.

here's the profit last 24 hrs. with rejects jumping up & down, restarting rigs & miners, remote failures, some downtime due to fine tuning on the cards & testing diff settings.



last hour accepted & rejects....

Terk, I appreciate your response about changing the way the payout system will function. The main issue I have with it is the fact that when the small payouts go out I have anywhere from 0.04xxx - 0.06xxx still in my "wallet". I only receive a small portion out of that amount - 0.1xxx or so. I hope you change the way the payouts work when you do a single payment a day. It would be even more frustrating to see a single payment go out at say 9PM, and then see 0.04xxx - 0.06xxx balance still on my account which would carry over the next day, and start all over again.

Sure vardiff matters, the guy just doesn't understand.
[/quote]

Vardiff does not matter for profits. It helps lower short term variance on stats and smooths out results for lower power rigs. That is why it exists. Again, profits are not effected by it.

Sure vardiff matters, the guy just doesn't understand.

pipe down https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5442832

I dont even mine there...

ok, lets see what do we have on waffle now

So for the last 3 days it's lower then previous by 0.001...
I think something is really wrong with that. But well, you can keep waiting I don't mind.  

Some people are ridiculously impatient... some coins don't mature for 3 days.

I stopped mining on the 14th.


EDIT: the 14th, in case you missed that.

I guess it is from coins that need to be manually traded and are stuck in an exchange somewhere waiting to be paid out to clevermining and then to us in btc.

There is a similar problem happening on waffle pool at the moment, they are changing the way they pay out from once a day to multiple times a day. The opposite of what some people are asking for on clevermining, I hope if Terk changes to one payment a day we don't run into this same problem here as wafflepoll are now encountering.

Who is being a dick? I am stating the fact that Clever still has coins the I mined.

Why don't you kindly fuck off.

If you could refrain from being a dick that'd be great.

haha...yeah

Thats what happens when a pool mines shit coins.

I stopped mining on like the 25th and I've still got shit in my balance.

After receiving a payout on the 27th I left to mine some new alt for a few days.

Upon returning here at my stats

Immature   0.00007900 BTC
Unexchanged   0.00053781 BTC
Ready For Payout   0.00124554 BTC
Total Expected   0.00186235 BTC

Why do I still have immature and unexchanged funds?

After 48+ hours shouldn't everything be matured/exchanged and moved into ready for payout?

I think it does. Otherwise tuning vardiff would not exist.
On wemineltc I am receiving various difficulties ranging from 64 to 600 depending on the particular rig's hashing power.
Taking into account that there is only one server in US and reject ratio is high due to latency I suspect that that it matters even more.
Currently i see across all rigs that difficulty is set to 512. Might be hard coded value.

Since clevermining is still in development I wonder what is Terk's opinion.

Should we use separate btc addresses for each mining rig?!
Is he working on sub-workers. Like for example "btcaddress_worker1"?!
Or should we just use one address for all of them?!

What is Terk's preference on this?

+1

Thanks for a reply.
But what I was wondering is how the pool calculates pool difficulty for a particular worker.
Which will be more optimal and preferable from server side, having all rigs under one login or split them individually.

there is not a "login", as you dont register.  You put your btc address as your username, and whatever as your password in all the workers.  Unless you want to monitor workers individually, at which point you would need multiple pay addresses for each worker in the usermane.

In multiple workers scenario should all workers use the very same login?