[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 289.

shango

sr. member

Activity: 248

Merit: 250

Quote from: cokeman0 on February 09, 2014, 11:42:27 AM

Quote from: shango on February 09, 2014, 11:32:00 AM

I tried again with increased intensity and the reject rate has jumped.
With my usual -I setting i get over 9% rejects. But this way i get over 1770 WU and higher hasrate.
With reduced intensity i get a little over 1400 WU and lower hashret but between 2% and 3% rejects.

Which is better ? The WUs are the actual work units, so the higher number - the better and rejects are considered, correct ?

Whats cards are you running ?

couple of r9 290x on that one

Slow1

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Your profitability is pegged against litecoin - Is it the most profitable single coin out there?

I did a quick compare to Doge here : http://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/miningtobtc-ltc-doge.html because Doge was brought up earlier in discussion. Seems that as Doge seems to be a bit stronger than LiteCoin it may be a better benchmark for comparison.

I realize you can't cater to every coin, but perhaps put a couple other 'big' ones on there and it could help sell your site better?

geocurt

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Quote from: _Crash_ on February 09, 2014, 05:42:05 AM

I very much like the design of the site to be honest, I like how it's using twitter bootstrap so it's phone, computer and tablet friendly. Just waiting on the API now Grin

Love the modern, flat design too - but it looks terrible on my 4.7inch screen. The images don't reorganize or scale properly.

Dishes

newbie

Activity: 40

Merit: 0

Quote from: cokeman0 on February 09, 2014, 11:42:27 AM

Quote from: shango on February 09, 2014, 11:32:00 AM

I tried again with increased intensity and the reject rate has jumped.
With my usual -I setting i get over 9% rejects. But this way i get over 1770 WU and higher hasrate.
With reduced intensity i get a little over 1400 WU and lower hashret but between 2% and 3% rejects.

Which is better ? The WUs are the actual work units, so the higher number - the better and rejects are considered, correct ?

Whats cards are you running ?

I would stick with your original intensity. In my experience, lowering intensity gets lower rejects, but at the end of the day, you are submitting less shares (after a really long period). Short term it looks better to get your rejects down, and if we lived in a perfect world, you could rely on it working out. However, mining is imperfect and fluctuates constantly, especially in multi coin pools. So sticking with your original WU of 1770 will pay off in the long run because you are essentially raising your "luck" factor. Multicoin pools have higher rejects than regular pools. It's just the way it is when your dealing with lots of coin switches, different block rates and difficulties. I think way too many people over think thier rejects and forget that rejects fluctuate constantly. You may have 9% one hour, but you may only have 1% the next hour. In the end, it's best to throw all your hashing power in, set it and forget it. You have to think long term. Short term variance is very high on multi pools. It's all about your payout over time.

cokeman0

newbie

Activity: 51

Merit: 0

Quote from: shango on February 09, 2014, 11:32:00 AM

I tried again with increased intensity and the reject rate has jumped.
With my usual -I setting i get over 9% rejects. But this way i get over 1770 WU and higher hasrate.
With reduced intensity i get a little over 1400 WU and lower hashret but between 2% and 3% rejects.

Which is better ? The WUs are the actual work units, so the higher number - the better and rejects are considered, correct ?

Whats cards are you running ?

shango

sr. member

Activity: 248

Merit: 250

I tried again with increased intensity and the reject rate has jumped.
With my usual -I setting i get over 9% rejects. But this way i get over 1770 WU and higher hasrate.
With reduced intensity i get a little over 1400 WU and lower hashret but between 2% and 3% rejects.

Which is better ? The WUs are the actual work units, so the higher number - the better and rejects are considered, correct ?

byt411

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: borris123 on February 09, 2014, 10:06:39 AM

Quote from: byt411 on February 09, 2014, 09:38:44 AM

Here is the most important things I think you should prioritize:
Fix all extra stales and get vardiff back up.
Make at least 30 min stats.
Make additional workers.

U don't need workers just put same bit wallet address. Cardiff I agree with and he is trying fix stales and rejects

Yes, but I mean to track different miner stats. Like different rigs.

shango

sr. member

Activity: 248

Merit: 250

3.5% rejects stable for 4 hours with the lowered intensity.
I will switch back to higher intensity again to get higher hashrate and will moitor the rejects, now that a fix has been applied.

Capttech08

member

Activity: 79

Merit: 10

Quote from: Terk on February 09, 2014, 09:12:03 AM

I just deployed some fixes that should:

1) improve stability, less pool restarts/disconnects will be required from now on.
2) Improve profitability a bit as it indirectly suffered from some connection issues.
3) One of the fixes is my attept on reducing rejects.

I will be monitoring pool-wide rejects ratio and see if it lowered but I would also appreciate to read how it changed on your side. These changes were deployed ~10 minutes ago so please consider your stats only from now on.

More real-time stats are my first priority just after I fix some technical problems in the backend that affect stability, rejected percentage and indirectly also profitability. This is my very top priority. Stats are immediately after this.

Currently stats are always updated between 10 and 20 minutes after full hour so you don't need to refresh the page all the time. I will be deploying more frequent stats soon.

Good morning pool. I've been watching my rejects for the last 2 hours and they are bouncing a ton. I had as low as 3.5% and as high (and currently at) 12% or 0.5MH/s. I will try dropping the intensity down in about an hour and let that run through for the rest of the day and post the results.

On a side note; I wish my psu would get here so I can get the other rig back up! /cry

borris123

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: byt411 on February 09, 2014, 09:38:44 AM

Here is the most important things I think you should prioritize:
Fix all extra stales and get vardiff back up.
Make at least 30 min stats.
Make additional workers.

U don't need workers just put same bit wallet address. Cardiff I agree with and he is trying fix stales and rejects

byt411

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Here is the most important things I think you should prioritize:
Fix all extra stales and get vardiff back up.
Make at least 30 min stats.
Make additional workers.

borris123

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: Terk on February 09, 2014, 09:12:03 AM

I just deployed some fixes that should:

1) improve stability, less pool restarts/disconnects will be required from now on.
2) Improve profitability a bit as it indirectly suffered from some connection issues.
3) One of the fixes is my attept on reducing rejects.

I will be monitoring pool-wide rejects ratio and see if it lowered but I would also appreciate to read how it changed on your side. These changes were deployed ~10 minutes ago so please consider your stats only from now on.

More real-time stats are my first priority just after I fix some technical problems in the backend that affect stability, rejected percentage and indirectly also profitability. This is my very top priority. Stats are immediately after this.

Currently stats are always updated between 10 and 20 minutes after full hour so you don't need to refresh the page all the time. I will be deploying more frequent stats soon.

Right will switch back over and let u know in few hours orbsp after been ahoppin and gym

Terk

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 522

I just deployed some fixes that should:

1) improve stability, less pool restarts/disconnects will be required from now on.
2) Improve profitability a bit as it indirectly suffered from some connection issues.
3) One of the fixes is my attept on reducing rejects.

I will be monitoring pool-wide rejects ratio and see if it lowered but I would also appreciate to read how it changed on your side. These changes were deployed ~10 minutes ago so please consider your stats only from now on.

More real-time stats are my first priority just after I fix some technical problems in the backend that affect stability, rejected percentage and indirectly also profitability. This is my very top priority. Stats are immediately after this.

Currently stats are always updated between 10 and 20 minutes after full hour so you don't need to refresh the page all the time. I will be deploying more frequent stats soon.

shango

sr. member

Activity: 248

Merit: 250

Quote from: borris123 on February 09, 2014, 09:06:38 AM

Reject rate gone high again no matter how much o mess with settings. Moving back to middlecoin for time being but Goin keep checking in. Maybe its cus I in UK? Great support and website shame bout rejects.

Boris, I am testing from Bulgaria with a small rig and managed to get stable reject rate of between 2% and 3% for the sake of a small decrease in hashrate.
So distance is probably not the reason.
I am posting my settings at our own board as I go : http://cointradertalk.org//index.php/topic,40.0.html

borris123

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Reject rate gone high again no matter how much o mess with settings. Moving back to middlecoin for time being but Goin keep checking in. Maybe its cus I in UK? Great support and website shame bout rejects.

borris123

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

When is vardiff Goin to be put back on? I think you should move the stats updated more towards the top of your list of to do things. Think my connection stable now so o can monitor how I do over the next 24 hours but its hard to work out when getting paid randomly depending on when coins exchanged and stats only updated every hour which I don't even know when it is so just end up refreshing all the time.

shango

sr. member

Activity: 248

Merit: 250

Allright, i managed to get it right - from all the changes i made, reducing the intensity was the one that dropped the reject rate and now it is stable between 1 - 2 % for a few hours.
However this has dropped my hashrate a bit and my effective WUs are now lower.
So not sure if it is a good trade. Will continue testing and will post results.

_Crash_

full member

Activity: 133

Merit: 100

I very much like the design of the site to be honest, I like how it's using twitter bootstrap so it's phone, computer and tablet friendly. Just waiting on the API now Grin

shango

sr. member

Activity: 248

Merit: 250

Quote from: XliptTit on February 08, 2014, 09:09:12 PM

I put --scan-time to 1

How did that work out for you ?

sgsdebruijn

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Please update the hashrate and other stats at least every half hour, every 15min is even better,

Topic: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 289. (Read 554387 times)