Topic: [ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 156. (Read 1103293 times)
January 03, 2017, 04:24:27 PM
I already sold all of mine back in September. I will buy back in later when the price drops further from all the dumpers. Looking for a 10K price.. I know its coming.
January 03, 2017, 04:18:34 PM
Dan is finally delivering. Do I wish it had been sooner? Yes. However, the tech is there and can be used NOW.
Soon it will be the only opportunity to sell your coins. Change them to FIBRE,UTIL,LXC , and be happy.
You are not doing those projects any favors slandering other projects. No serious developer appreciate posts like that.
January 03, 2017, 04:13:27 PM
Haters gonna Hate. Cutting edge tech takes a lot of hard work and testing, unlike some of those copy/paste projects.
January 03, 2017, 04:13:18 PM
Dan is finally delivering. Do I wish it had been sooner? Yes. However, the tech is there and can be used NOW.
Soon it will be the only opportunity to sell your coins. Change them to FIBRE,UTIL,LXC , and be happy.
January 03, 2017, 04:03:06 PM
Dan is finally delivering. Do I wish it had been sooner? Yes. However, the tech is there and can be used NOW.
January 03, 2017, 04:01:05 PM
These people just ignore stuff (I.E. reality) that conflicts with their fud plans. It makes them look really stupid. I too have used the DX. They just cant admit to being wrong.
January 03, 2017, 03:50:37 PM
An attempt to revive the already dead. 
Can't tell if trolling or uninformed?
How is a project with working promised functionality dead?
You can download it and use it to trade BTC to XC, or Swift.
I traded XC to Swift more than half a year ago using the wallet. Completely decentralized.
January 03, 2017, 03:46:06 PM
An attempt to revive the already dead.
January 03, 2017, 03:21:41 PM
Right Im off to polo! ... NOW!
January 03, 2017, 03:18:04 PM
YES!
January 03, 2017, 02:55:54 PM
Details about CLTV - https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/checklocktimeverify-or-how-a-time-lock-patch-will-boost-bitcoin-s-potential-1446658530
Code:
Blocknets CLTV Algo
OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY is a new op code in the works that Bitcoin Core devs will be looking to deploy with a soft fork in the near future. It is described here in BIP 65. The op code allows us to create transactions that can be spent in different ways depending on the nLockTime of the spending transaction.
ACCT using CLTV is superior in that it does not have the transaction malleability issues of ACCT using refund transactions (it does however have the same other vulnerabilities discussed in the previous section). Additionally, all transaction signing occurs on the blockchain, and the trading parties only need to exchange the hashed secret and their public keys in order for the trade to take place.
Steps
Step1.
Initiator creates secret X, and hashes it to create H(X). Initiator also creates public private key pair (pubkey i1,i2 / privkey i2,i2). Responder creates public private key pair (pubkey r1,r2 / privkey r1,r2).
Step 2.
Initiator shares H(X) and pubkey i2 with responder. Responder shares pubkey r1 with intiator.
Step 3.
Initiator creates TxAb. TxAb can be redeemed after time T2 with privkey i1. At any time TxAb can redeemed with signature from privkey r1 and reveal of secret X. Initiator broadcasts TxAb onto the network.
Step 4.
Responder confirms TxAb. Responder creates TxBb. TxBb can be redeemed after T1 time with privkey r2. At any time TxBb can be redeemed with signature fom privkey i2 and reveal of secret X. Responder broadcasts TxBb onto the network.
Step 5.
Initiator creates TxBp which spends TxBb using privkey i2 and secret X. With the revealed secret, responder can create TxAp which spends TxAb with privkey r1 and secret X.
Notes
If initiator fails to broadcast TxAb in step 3, the exchange has failed and no steps need to be taken by the responder.
If responder fails to broadcast TxBb in step 4, initiator can create refund transaction TxAr which redeems TxAb after time T2 using privkey i1.
If initiator fails to spend TxBb on step 5 before time T1, responder can create refund transaction TxBr after time T1 using privkey r2. If responder fails to spend TxAb before time T2, initiator can use TxAr to get refund from TxAb.
OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY is a new op code in the works that Bitcoin Core devs will be looking to deploy with a soft fork in the near future. It is described here in BIP 65. The op code allows us to create transactions that can be spent in different ways depending on the nLockTime of the spending transaction.
ACCT using CLTV is superior in that it does not have the transaction malleability issues of ACCT using refund transactions (it does however have the same other vulnerabilities discussed in the previous section). Additionally, all transaction signing occurs on the blockchain, and the trading parties only need to exchange the hashed secret and their public keys in order for the trade to take place.
Steps
Step1.
Initiator creates secret X, and hashes it to create H(X). Initiator also creates public private key pair (pubkey i1,i2 / privkey i2,i2). Responder creates public private key pair (pubkey r1,r2 / privkey r1,r2).
Step 2.
Initiator shares H(X) and pubkey i2 with responder. Responder shares pubkey r1 with intiator.
Step 3.
Initiator creates TxAb. TxAb can be redeemed after time T2 with privkey i1. At any time TxAb can redeemed with signature from privkey r1 and reveal of secret X. Initiator broadcasts TxAb onto the network.
Step 4.
Responder confirms TxAb. Responder creates TxBb. TxBb can be redeemed after T1 time with privkey r2. At any time TxBb can be redeemed with signature fom privkey i2 and reveal of secret X. Responder broadcasts TxBb onto the network.
Step 5.
Initiator creates TxBp which spends TxBb using privkey i2 and secret X. With the revealed secret, responder can create TxAp which spends TxAb with privkey r1 and secret X.
Notes
If initiator fails to broadcast TxAb in step 3, the exchange has failed and no steps need to be taken by the responder.
If responder fails to broadcast TxBb in step 4, initiator can create refund transaction TxAr which redeems TxAb after time T2 using privkey i1.
If initiator fails to spend TxBb on step 5 before time T1, responder can create refund transaction TxBr after time T1 using privkey r2. If responder fails to spend TxAb before time T2, initiator can use TxAr to get refund from TxAb.
January 03, 2017, 02:52:45 PM
Finally, after much delay we are ready to resume user testing with the new CLTV based DX. Testing will be done on slack if you want to be involved.
January 03, 2017, 05:12:26 AM
Last day on polo. 
January 02, 2017, 10:09:14 PM
Big expectation in the air, and big responsibility of old/new DEV
Pretty sure that this is a post that is in it for signature BS?The old dev is the same as the 'new dev'...nothing changed in that regard!
No, it's not signature BS, i invested in @atcsecure ideas when xcurrency was called x11 coin. I say old/new with hope for new chapter in xc/block proggress.
January 02, 2017, 07:50:33 PM
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.
The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software. Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off
Thats the way the main dev should talk to people. I just followed the thread and it still feels to me this is vaporware. XC never provided the promissed functionality and was once traded for 1mBTC.
You provided a roadmap and just dropped it without any explaination and when someone asked about it, the story was told "that something will be released soon" ™.
I still hope no new bagholders get lured into this shitcoins. The current price of BLOCK also speaks for itself
.Terrible they neglected these projects so much on here and let polo delist.
However, they have stuck around rather than totally vanish so lets hope they get some back bone and return here to the forums and stop hiding away on slack
I have bought some block back and a tiny amount of xc. Let's see what happens.
If they come back to the board with some results from months of hiding and start rebuilding the community on this board that will demonstrate to me block is not a scam. Same for xc do something with it.
If it were a full scam they would be gone by now.
Seems xc got a rough deal to me. Block can probably make a big come back if they are serious about it. XC well I hope so too although the silence on this board makes it look dead to most people.
Nobody has time for all the different slacks and other boards. Just come back to crypto capital here asap.
Lets see for 2017 the polo delist may have helped some get into block cheap or maybe produced another bunch of poor bagholders. Let;s see.
i would dump. no one with at least one brain cell will trust these scammers anymore. Just look at this: http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts. The expenses of blocknet "tracked", last entry "2015-04-23 "
It took them more then two years to deliver nearly nothing with a stunning "Estimated BTC Total is 969.31" lured out at ITO times
. Can't believe they will get away with this ...And they will stay and make maybe another 1000BTC at the next (empty promise) pump/ITO ...
Don't say you haven't been warned
I totally agree with you that that does look very bad.
Thing is Dans full ID is known. A blatant scam of nearly 1000BTC would guarantee some serious issues for him and anyone else closely involved.
Lets hope there will be a ledger of expenses arriving soon with his return to the forum and some large developments the block xc community are going to go wild over.
Lets hear what they say when there is a return to the forum. 1000 BTC can;t just have vanished on nothing.
If there is no return here and nothing comes of this in a reasonable time then ........
The link in the wiki http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Accountability_Measures - PROOF OF DEVELOPER is dead - but hey there is
https://web.archive.org/web/20150108230748/http://www.coinssource.com/trust-index/blocknet-blockand this linkedin profile which reads like a scammer's profile
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/dan-metcalf-b821a812The last time i posted something in here it got deleted. let's see how it works out this time
I think this is my first kind act this year. People save your money and don't try to be the next-gen BLOCKNET/XC bagholders
And i think the ITO will have no consequnces for him, as he can always say he underestimated the time it needs to develop these apps (although nothing really happend the last few months)
i will double posted it here just in case: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17377482
January 02, 2017, 07:41:42 PM
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.
The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software. Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off
Thats the way the main dev should talk to people. I just followed the thread and it still feels to me this is vaporware. XC never provided the promissed functionality and was once traded for 1mBTC.
You provided a roadmap and just dropped it without any explaination and when someone asked about it, the story was told "that something will be released soon" ™.
I still hope no new bagholders get lured into this shitcoins. The current price of BLOCK also speaks for itself
.Terrible they neglected these projects so much on here and let polo delist.
However, they have stuck around rather than totally vanish so lets hope they get some back bone and return here to the forums and stop hiding away on slack
I have bought some block back and a tiny amount of xc. Let's see what happens.
If they come back to the board with some results from months of hiding and start rebuilding the community on this board that will demonstrate to me block is not a scam. Same for xc do something with it.
If it were a full scam they would be gone by now.
Seems xc got a rough deal to me. Block can probably make a big come back if they are serious about it. XC well I hope so too although the silence on this board makes it look dead to most people.
Nobody has time for all the different slacks and other boards. Just come back to crypto capital here asap.
Lets see for 2017 the polo delist may have helped some get into block cheap or maybe produced another bunch of poor bagholders. Let;s see.
i would dump. no one with at least one brain cell will trust these scammers anymore. Just look at this: http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts. The expenses of blocknet "tracked", last entry "2015-04-23 "
It took them more then two years to deliver nearly nothing with a stunning "Estimated BTC Total is 969.31" lured out at ITO times
. Can't believe they will get away with this ...And they will stay and make maybe another 1000BTC at the next (empty promise) pump/ITO ...
Don't say you haven't been warned
I totally agree with you that that does look very bad.
Thing is Dans full ID is known. A blatant scam of nearly 1000BTC would guarantee some serious issues for him and anyone else closely involved.
Lets hope there will be a ledger of expenses arriving soon with his return to the forum and some large developments the block xc community are going to go wild over.
Lets hear what they say when there is a return to the forum. 1000 BTC can;t just have vanished on nothing.
If there is no return here and nothing comes of this in a reasonable time then ........
January 02, 2017, 07:29:19 PM
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.
The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software. Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off
Thats the way the main dev should talk to people. I just followed the thread and it still feels to me this is vaporware. XC never provided the promissed functionality and was once traded for 1mBTC.
You provided a roadmap and just dropped it without any explaination and when someone asked about it, the story was told "that something will be released soon" ™.
I still hope no new bagholders get lured into this shitcoins. The current price of BLOCK also speaks for itself
.Terrible they neglected these projects so much on here and let polo delist.
However, they have stuck around rather than totally vanish so lets hope they get some back bone and return here to the forums and stop hiding away on slack
I have bought some block back and a tiny amount of xc. Let's see what happens.
If they come back to the board with some results from months of hiding and start rebuilding the community on this board that will demonstrate to me block is not a scam. Same for xc do something with it.
If it were a full scam they would be gone by now.
Seems xc got a rough deal to me. Block can probably make a big come back if they are serious about it. XC well I hope so too although the silence on this board makes it look dead to most people.
Nobody has time for all the different slacks and other boards. Just come back to crypto capital here asap.
Lets see for 2017 the polo delist may have helped some get into block cheap or maybe produced another bunch of poor bagholders. Let;s see.
i would dump. no one with at least one brain cell will trust these scammers anymore. Just look at this: http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts. The expenses of blocknet "tracked", last entry "2015-04-23 "
It took them more then two years to deliver nearly nothing with a stunning "Estimated BTC Total is 969.31" lured out at ITO times
. Can't believe they will get away with this ...And they will stay and make maybe another 1000BTC at the next (empty promise) pump/ITO ...
Don't say you haven't been warned
January 02, 2017, 06:50:00 PM
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.
The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software. Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off
Thats the way the main dev should talk to people. I just followed the thread and it still feels to me this is vaporware. XC never provided the promissed functionality and was once traded for 1mBTC.
You provided a roadmap and just dropped it without any explaination and when someone asked about it, the story was told "that something will be released soon" ™.
I still hope no new bagholders get lured into this shitcoins. The current price of BLOCK also speaks for itself
.Terrible they neglected these projects so much on here and let polo delist.
However, they have stuck around rather than totally vanish so lets hope they get some back bone and return here to the forums and stop hiding away on slack
I have bought some block back and a tiny amount of xc. Let's see what happens.
If they come back to the board with some results from months of hiding and start rebuilding the community on this board that will demonstrate to me block is not a scam. Same for xc do something with it.
If it were a full scam they would be gone by now.
Seems xc got a rough deal to me. Block can probably make a big come back if they are serious about it. XC well I hope so too although the silence on this board makes it look dead to most people.
Nobody has time for all the different slacks and other boards. Just come back to crypto capital here asap.
Lets see for 2017 the polo delist may have helped some get into block cheap or maybe produced another bunch of poor bagholders. Let;s see.
January 02, 2017, 06:36:57 PM
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.
The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software. Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off
Thats the way the main dev should talk to people. I just followed the thread and it still feels to me this is vaporware. XC never provided the promissed functionality and was once traded for 1mBTC.
You provided a roadmap and just dropped it without any explaination and when someone asked about it, the story was told "that something will be released soon" ™.
I still hope no new bagholders get lured into this shitcoins. The current price of BLOCK also speaks for itself
.Jump to: