Author

Topic: [ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 157. (Read 1103312 times)

sr. member
Activity: 324
Merit: 250
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.

Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with.  Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).


I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.


The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software.  Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off




Thats the way the main dev should talk to people. I just followed the thread and it still feels to me this is vaporware. XC never provided the promissed functionality and was once traded for 1mBTC.
You provided a roadmap and just dropped it without any explaination and when someone asked about it, the story was told "that something will be released soon" ™.
I still hope no new bagholders get lured into this shitcoins. The current price of BLOCK also speaks for itself Wink.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
The same consensus is being reached in slack.  I think after the holidays a return to this forum will take place.  Merry Christmas everyone!

Sounds like the best plan forward.
member
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
The same consensus is being reached in slack.  I think after the holidays a return to this forum will take place.  Merry Christmas everyone!

Yeah looking forward to 2017. Merry Christmas all.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
A Wound in Eternity
Coinitrage.com Arbitrage Firm now accepts BLOCK!



Live chat support is now available on-site to BLOCK users, or forum support is also available on our BitcoinTalk ANN: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitchange-brand-new-coin-exchange-2016-launch-1725963

Please note that while we offer services with BLOCK, we are not directly affiliated with the developers of the coin. Please read our Terms of Service before using the Coinitrage Arbitrage Platform!

Guys, THIS IS A SCAM, do not use!! You have been warned, cheap HYIP scam.
hero member
Activity: 771
Merit: 521
The same consensus is being reached in slack.  I think after the holidays a return to this forum will take place.  Merry Christmas everyone!
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
Good to see this thread picking up a little.

Would be good to see every single person on the old XC thread and the BLOCK thread to be send an AUTO pm and bringing them back here to get active again is atcsecure is coming back and we are going to get this community rebuilt on this board.

Would also like to see a statement that xc is not going to be left out and there is plans afoot to revamp this one.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1001
Coinitrage.com Arbitrage Firm now accepts BLOCK!



Live chat support is now available on-site to BLOCK users, or forum support is also available on our BitcoinTalk ANN: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitchange-brand-new-coin-exchange-2016-launch-1725963

Please note that while we offer services with BLOCK, we are not directly affiliated with the developers of the coin. Please read our Terms of Service before using the Coinitrage Arbitrage Platform!

Go away from this thread there is space for any ponzi site nobody will want to lose his coins just for dreaming on get doubled there.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
Hello everyone!

Quick update from Dan:

Quote
the POC deployment of DX v.3 (CLTV algo) has started and we expect to be live on Monday.

(For the record, the process typically goes: development --> QA --> deployment --> usage.)

full member
Activity: 293
Merit: 109
Coinitrage.com Arbitrage Firm now accepts BLOCK!



Live chat support is now available on-site to BLOCK users, or forum support is also available on our BitcoinTalk ANN: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitchange-brand-new-coin-exchange-2016-launch-1725963

Please note that while we offer services with BLOCK, we are not directly affiliated with the developers of the coin. Please read our Terms of Service before using the Coinitrage Arbitrage Platform!
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Blocknet and StealthCoin will be prevailed at the end.
sr. member
Activity: 430
Merit: 254
Amen to everything cryptohunter said.
legendary
Activity: 1457
Merit: 1033
+1 Perfect post.

I also believe in Block, but i investet ~8 BTC in XC ICO,...the biggest losses that i got from an investment.

I was also scaried when i red that the main dev open a new projekt called Blocknet,...and after that (please correct me if i'm wrong) startet parallel an other coin.

I forget the name but i'm really sure that their is one.

Hmmm,....still holding my Blocknet and XC coins that i got from the ICO,...i hope with time their come the benefit.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
I cannot announce anything at this stage but I expect to be able to very soon.

Finally, BLOCK's price is tied intrinsically to the use of the DX. It's fundamentally not dependent on speculators on Polo. While I value Polo as a gateway, it's not part of our business model.

End of statement.

Two things I love in this "statement."

1.  Says "I cannot announce anything" then immediately proceeds to announce an upcoming announcement "very soon."   Grin

2.  The sniffy put down of "speculators" who were dumb enough to become bagholding investors in Dan's failed "business model."


To think XC was once a rival for dash is terrible when you view the MC now. The XC holders (of which i have a tiny amount of) must feel gross disappointment at this stage.

ATCsecure needs to stop being scared of this board just because he got a hard time before. Man up and get back here and regroup you've stuck around long enough to prove it was not a total scam so come back on the board and get discussion and interest picking up here.

What do cockroaches do when you shine a light on them?  That's right, they scurry away to hide in some dark place.

That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.

Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with.  Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).

Give them a chance at the least to come back here and make good.

XC looks like a scam to me right now because it did not follow its original roadmap. I do not believe it is okay to remove things from a roadmap and add them to another project. Also shutting the thread and just focusing only on block

HOWEVER...  if they came back and worked on the project of XC and atleast showed they did not just dump this project and put all that funding raised from XC into block then that would be much better than what situation we have now. I would rather see them given opportunity to redeem this one.

BLOCK - I have not seen much about it on here so to me (and most people that dont have time for every single slack of every single project they invest) it looks a bit slow or deserted although yes it seems a lot of work has been happening on block if a DX is almost ready.

I sold most of both of these (AT QUITE A LOSS ) but would buy back in if I saw some reason to.

The fact atcsecure is still here and not totally vanished with the block funding tells me he is not all bad and I think was just scared off by dash troll. Man up to these people. If you have good intentions. Lay out these intentions and proof that you are pressing forward with them.

Trolls with unfounded claims from the dash camp have no power here if they have no facts to back them up.

atcsecure you are the captain. Come here on this board and man the ship. Others will support you if there is good reason too. Make sure you can show what you have done and where the block funding is and where it went.

xc - well this is the main issue. I as a xc holder (small one now) feel that xc community got a rough deal. I mean that collapsed. Fair enough you needed to concentrate on block but closing the xc thread was a HUGE mistake. XC needs some attention and ongoing development discussion.

As for the other guy the spokesman on the thread. NO NO NO. He is a master of English and and novice handling people.

ATCsecure you need to get involved on this board too. Don't let the community feel separated from the captain, and don't be scared to bring trolls to heal with forcing them to discuss facts only regarding the project. Personal discussion and making things personal has no place on this board.

If the spokesman is to keep his position he needs to dial it down a notch and get more friendly and less curt with people. He's not a bad guy I'm sure but comes over as rude a lot of the time.

I used to like the XC community and it was shocking how it was handled. It made it look like a scam even though a lot of xc moved into block it does not mean xc should have been pretty much cancelled.

Trolls can not be just deleted unless repeating nonsense that has been already disproven. You need to bring them to discussing facts only about the project currently if they are not willing to do that they are then deleted. If you have good intentions and have not been scamming XC or block holders you will be vindicated here and both projects will move forwards.

I would like to hear a clear plan for blocknet and XC a clear road map that proves both projects are going forward and to see atcsecure here posting about the projects not endlessly answering the same troll questions and bullshit. Answer them once to a reasonable level of satisfaction then thats enough.

I know blocknet required funding but really it came at too much of a cost to XC.

XC should be given some tlc now and when that is really happening I think you will see a return in this community of people that were here before.

I see a few of them still posting around places on here.

Slack is ok for tech discussion only. I belong to many communities on here. I tell them all the same thing forget that for anything other than almost private tech chat. The rest on the boards. You want to maintain and grow a community this board is the place. Of course you need a good project to get behind too.

Cheap entry here for a lot of people to get back into block and xc.

If ATCsecure comes back here and gets involved puts out a decent roadmap with realistic time table then I would buy some at these prices and I'm sure others would too.

You must never close down threads ever again it just sends such a bad message to people.

Just admit it you got sucked into blocknet development and forgot all about XC supporters. Fine come back and redeem yourself. You can not succeed with blocknet whilst XC is still so utterly neglected it will simply leave a bad taste. You will be in the situation dash is in. However good they could make their project nobody wants to support something that exists from ripping others off. Blocknets future is in your hands XC and the old XC supporters need to be looked after.

XC was meant to be an anon coin. How is that anon tech really when matched against decent anon coins there are loads now...shadow, monero, dark, zcash zcoin . Let's be serious is XC's anon worth people looking into? If not let's clone zcash or another anon tech thats worth having.


I would support these projects but they must be honest and transparent and no more running off and hiding away that is bullshit and cost a lot of people a fortune.

hero member
Activity: 771
Merit: 521
Well said atsecure! Cant you a bot get rid of these trolls?  I have actually tested the DX. You idiots dont know what you are talking about. It made sense to go to slack duting the dev.  Now its all almost ready so I imagine there will be more presence here too.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.

Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with.  Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).


I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.


The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software.  Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off


hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
Quote

ATCsecure needs to stop being scared of this board just because he got a hard time before. Man up and get back here and regroup you've stuck around long enough to prove it was not a total scam so come back on the board and get discussion and interest picking up here. XC's tech was shown to have flaws so what let's simply clone other tech then no big deal these days every man and his dog is cloning superior tech and putting their own variations on it. Obviously you have considerable skills so just come back here and bring XC and block back on track.


It has nothing to do with being scared and I have no problem being "active" again here if that makes sense moving forward.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG

come on don't try to find new bagholders.

this is vaporware at it's best, like XC. Still unbelievable how long it was possible to keep this brick above water Cheesy

I'm sorry for all bagholders. People don't trust this dev and don't buy into this coin when the next ground breaking news promise stuff that will never be delivered

also look at https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknet - the dev now seems to try to update the README files to give the impression of active "development".

vapor ware?

the DX is on its 3rd major update, we have already done cross chain transactions using nlocktime, but we have refactored to support BIP65/cltv due to transaction malleability..

why don't you follow the link in the readme to see the actual updates of the dx?

its all there in the repo

The BIP65/CLTV based POC/Demo is launching this week.



Need to post here regularly not just arrive with some snip of news after exchanges have delisted through lack of community and interest. This and XC has been the most disappointing on here. I have hardly any left of either of these thankfully.


I have been on slacking discussing this refactoring since the decision was made to stop user testing.  Unfortunately there have been challenges in doing that work which took a while a to resolve.

Bring the community back to this board. SLack is the sure way for your project to die from lack of interest and investment.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG

come on don't try to find new bagholders.

this is vaporware at it's best, like XC. Still unbelievable how long it was possible to keep this brick above water Cheesy

I'm sorry for all bagholders. People don't trust this dev and don't buy into this coin when the next ground breaking news promise stuff that will never be delivered

also look at https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknet - the dev now seems to try to update the README files to give the impression of active "development".

vapor ware?

the DX is on its 3rd major update, we have already done cross chain transactions using nlocktime, but we have refactored to support BIP65/cltv due to transaction malleability..

why don't you follow the link in the readme to see the actual updates of the dx?

its all there in the repo

The BIP65/CLTV based POC/Demo is launching this week.



Need to post here regularly not just arrive with some snip of news after exchanges have delisted through lack of community and interest. This and XC has been the most disappointing on here. I have hardly any left of either of these thankfully.

This thread is deprecated. We don't post here often.

Despite this though, I posted some news this month on our new CLTV-based algo.

Slack is active.

Development is active.

Markets are active, and until this news from Polo we've had months of steady baseline growth (plus the usual spikes of excitement).

We're now on v.3 of live, working DX code. There is no possibility by which this can be called vaporware. Come and test it yourself.

Polo's news is bizarre and, in my view misguided.

We're approaching production release and have been working on some exciting consumer-focused partnerships in the background. I cannot announce anything at this stage but I expect to be able to very soon.

Finally, BLOCK's price is tied intrinsically to the use of the DX. It's fundamentally not dependent on speculators on Polo. While I value Polo as a gateway, it's not part of our business model.

End of statement.


This is the problem. This thread should still be the MAIN point of contact for the community. Running from this board in the face of a few dark coin trolls is what killed xc and block. You guys should have stuck around on here. All communities that leave this board wither and die. There is new blook on this boad that is to be injected daily as some other leave. This is how the community grows interest and investment. NO crypto is above or too large to need this board. This board is crypto central.

This includes XC - xc was to have the DX first before it got moved to block.

XC needs some work and some community back behind it.  How difficult will it be and how familiar are the team here with zcash can we clone that or zcoin for xc? I know the main focus is block but surely with just a little work and some community spirit XC can rise again. However I know xc is to receive some value from the trading on block right? so perhaps zcash wont work with that?

Bring these communities back to the board here and watch them grow if there is work to justify new interest. To think XC was once a rival for dash is terrible when you view the MC now. The XC holders (of which i have a tiny amount of) must feel gross disappointment at this stage.

ATCsecure needs to stop being scared of this board just because he got a hard time before. Man up and get back here and regroup you've stuck around long enough to prove it was not a total scam so come back on the board and get discussion and interest picking up here. XC's tech was shown to have flaws so what let's simply clone other tech then no big deal these days every man and his dog is cloning superior tech and putting their own variations on it. Obviously you have considerable skills so just come back here and bring XC and block back on track.

I would even consider at this point reaching out to polo and showing them a road map or something to keep it on there. Once delisted it is not easy to return.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250

come on don't try to find new bagholders.

this is vaporware at it's best, like XC. Still unbelievable how long it was possible to keep this brick above water Cheesy

I'm sorry for all bagholders. People don't trust this dev and don't buy into this coin when the next ground breaking news promise stuff that will never be delivered

also look at https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknet - the dev now seems to try to update the README files to give the impression of active "development".

vapor ware?

the DX is on its 3rd major update, we have already done cross chain transactions using nlocktime, but we have refactored to support BIP65/cltv due to transaction malleability..

why don't you follow the link in the readme to see the actual updates of the dx?

its all there in the repo

The BIP65/CLTV based POC/Demo is launching this week.



What is POC?
Jump to: