Topic: [ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 345. (Read 1103311 times)

Would it be possible to connect up the folks that continue to just go over the same old crap a private room to vet their concerns so we don't need to listen to their spew and spill about what they feel is best for a majority of Blocknet investors and their off point discussions. It gets old real fast and we basically view these comments as worthless and unsubstantiated. Why do they continue to make this project about them and their ego. This is about the crypto and moving forward.

500 BTC worth in alts + ~300 BTC from Bittrex + ~100 BTC from Poloniex + ? BTC from Bter.

So, at a bare minimum around 900 BTC has been collected, but I am sure some BTC from Bter was collected.  However, sales have come to a near halt since the FUD campaign started.  I am keen on seeing how XC / BlockNET responds if / when they release an official statement.

Scammers will scam and Liars will lie.

yeah, apparently there have been enough ito sales as for development to begin, that means that if FUD works and sales hault at this point, blocknet shares will be extremely rare after ITO, when team delivers proof of concept.

500 BTC worth in alts + ~300 BTC from Bittrex + ~100 BTC from Poloniex + ? BTC from Bter.

So, at a bare minimum around 900 BTC has been collected, but I am sure some BTC from Bter was collected.  However, sales have come to a near halt since the FUD campaign started.  I am keen on seeing how XC / BlockNET responds if / when they release an official statement.

Any news how many BTCs are invested in Block?

So he funded them cause he believes in it. how does this affect blocknet? people need to understand one thing. a corrupt coin doesn't make or break the blocknet. if util is shady and a scam nobody will use them on or of the blocknet. the bridge doesn't give them any advantage if they don't deliver high quality tech and if they do with a pumper as investor but it works fine i'm more than willing to try it through xbridge. the foundation is still likely to drop projects of its seat if they happen to not deliver but it doesn'T affect blocknets usability or advantage for participating coins one bit. if Blocknet will be come what i envision it to be seeing coins fail on the blocknet will be just as commen as of the blocknet. the foundation seat will be an indicator of the legitimacy of a project but this can only be determined through the delivery of promised developments. i don't observe util so i don't know if they are behind in this regard.

Util could serve an interesting role in this process so let me make a proposition:

since prom and Dan make contradicting comments its really an unhealthy scenario for them to sit on the foundation together (depending on proms role, say in util, still not shure here)

Util could be the first of many coins that isn't part of the foundation first but still enables the xbridge to give their user the advantages of blocknet. by delivering the technology and doing well they could gain their seat on blocknet.

So the foundation seat is a vehicle of verification but the acces tool Xbridge will really become open source. and if million shitcoins implement it it doesn't hurt the good coins one bit since they are still not part of the foundation. the only way they could capitalise from blocknet would be delivering unique tech and by so they are no shitclones anymore. the good coins on blocknet would benefit from even bigger trafic for their good technology.

Trading has started at poloniex

That's the problem isn't it? haha

You know your project has a problem when the media campaign of one single concerned forum member is more substantial and has a bigger impact than the media campaign of your project.
I've heard that will change soon though.

LOL. It's even closed source. I have no idea why anyone is even bothering with this spasm. Too much noise for a closed source. Who wants to buy that should be able to gamble and loose. They're buyig now not only promises. Now they buy promises with surprises attached. Very nice. I need to launch one of these rippoffs too. You don't even need code these days to get your 1 million dollars. A.M.A.Z.I.N.G.

I just see pure speculation here He does not refer or name Prometheus anywhere in this post and even if he would if he is just an Investor who cares? the fact that he will have any say in the Util dev plan is pure speculation.

Still no Evidence here.

Pure ignorance...
yeah, let's not unite the coins, lets make separate coins over and over again, and play the same P&D game over and over again.
There it is, anon is no more a hype. What's next.

GTFO! BlockNet is trying to achieve something good for the Altcoin world. But you plain stupid, so you can't understand that.

no need to apologies  . i enjoyed your perspective.
Yesterday we had 8 threads open by spotnik on alts section of which unbelievable 6 surrounded Dan,Blocknet. This alone let me to the conclusion that we are dealing with an organised campaign more than geniune concern all user ratings and the conspirative nature of some accusations aside. what went on yesterday will hurt this whole forum for a long time. i think alot of people see it this way wether they are blocknet holders or just neutral. Sad enough that this still has to be responded to.
Whoever is still uncertain right now just look at the plain numbers. 1 thread is a concern. 2 threads is ok if you feel like nobody hears you. but 6 ? and thats just the spotnik threads . i think we had 10 blocknet/Dan threads in total.