I have to say, I'm loving burst so far, but I have a long term concern.
You guys talk about things like how decentralized burst is, right alongside statements praising new developments like gpu mining.
I can't help but see those sorts of things as counter to each other in the long term. What, in the future, would prevent relative few whales from putting up massive rigs fast connected to a few petabytes of storage, with GPU's driving utterly ridiculous numbers of nonces? (working in IT for the last two decades, that sort of rig isn't really too hard to imagine, just damned expensive)
Meaning it's not so decentralized when you need a minimum of 100T of dedicated storage just to make a dent. You end up with pretty much bitcoin today, but without the userbase/value. So, I've gotta ask, if there's something in the economic model that accounts for this? Or are we just figuring expensive is good? (hopefully in terms of exchange rate too, right?)
With bitcoin one can rent heaps of mining power for a couple hours and 51% attack. With Burst it isn't that easy. You first need to plot, and that will take a lot of hours. It's very rare anywhere to find a lot of gpu's hooked up with a load of hdd's. With this setup, it isn't really worth the attack, cause of the massive investment it takes. It's a bit like PoS, by attacking the network you are hurting yourself as well. Attacking the network damages it, and for anyone with plots this is not good. As the netsize increases it becomes much, much more secure.
Economically, Burst is not in a good place. 8PB is a lot storage, if you look at storj/sia's storage goals, we currently exceed them by a lot. Unfortunately our storage is not being used by files, but rather just nonces. But then when you look at storj and sia and maidsafe, their blockchains are either PoS (not my preference), or scypt/sha stuff. This is far from efficient. I believe that if we can get a storage system running on top of burst, using burst (kinda like storj on mastercoin, but using mastercoins for payment). Actually it'd be more like sia. Decentralized storage built in, but also the ability to rather share storage as well. This way people without lots of bandwidth can still mine, and those with lots of bandwidth can earn for storage sharing. A simple application can be built which allows you to automatically "mine" whatever is the most profitable, whether it be getting paid by others to store their files, or it be to mine coins and secure the blockchain.
I realize that most coins use a model of a decreasing block reward, and so does burst. Thing is though, all coins pretty much have the same issue, those who got in at the beginning are making loads, and can pretty much crash the coin due to how much they have. Imagine satoshi dumping all the btc he might have. Or someone else up there. Not good. I think that we should change burst from this model. I'm open to lots of discussion, and would love to hear how the community feels about this. My proposal is to freeze the block reward, and leave it what it is now forever. This will make burst's total supply unlimited, and seeing as the reward is already down quite a lot, the initial buyers and miners still have an advantage, but from this point on it's fair. Although the amount of coins being introduced daily then would remain constant, inflation % would decrease.
Another issue which burst is currently facing is a lack of funding and devs. All the clones have loads of it, and i dunno what to do about it. If nothing happens here then Burst is dead. It's the hard reality of it.
If idiot elmit is going to keep on abusing this thread complaining then all i can say is that he is a really sad person with no respect for anyone. I wrote my own faucet code, so stop complaining elmit. I realize that you wouldn't be able to code your own faucet, but that doesn't mean i can't. I'm actually over all this with you. If you don't stop then everyone's gonna quit. Everyone know's that your assets are a scam, if people still go ahead and buy then, well i can't stop them from banging their heads on a wall.
EDIT: Forgot something
I would also likely be for some modifications to make burst more cpu intensive. This would be less efficient, true, but it would also make it harder for datacenters to get involved. Most average users have a lot higher cpu vs hdd ratio. I mean, they have enough cpu power to mine with a lot more hdd space than they generally have available, while currently the algo is quite low cpu, which is great for datacenters. It would also make it more attractive for miners who currently mine scrypt coins and bitcoin, as gpu's would be used more heavily there, giving them an advantage if they buy some hdds