Topic: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Community Governance | Bitcoin Devs | Lightning Network - page 389. (Read 1201691 times)
February 20, 2016, 04:06:50 PM
February 20, 2016, 03:11:41 PM
This coin have big potential, more buy is now 
February 20, 2016, 03:01:15 PM
Sure, not meant as dis toward Decred. Also, appreciate your time in posting the depiction.
Your numbers reflect that only ~32% of airdrop recipients have opted to claim their windfall. I merely pointed out that of the few Decred YouTube videos that have been uploaded over time depict über-low view counts putting the actual number of recipients in questions, again, not a dis.
I chose this video because it had the most view counts for the search term "Decred" at the time (and still now) with just over 100 views, now standing at 208, doubled since I linked to it on this thread. I'm just taken aback that the counts (other Decred video don't enjoy view counts over 100) aren't much higher given that folks are expressing issues, hence normally seeking out solutions on boards and, yes, YouTube videos. I contend that the view counts should be no less than 1/3 of the airdrop recipients given that 1/3 have already exited and the other third is well-versed.
Just an observation I'm sharing, accepting any proof of the contrary.
February 20, 2016, 02:50:53 PM
As of 2016/2/12 there are left 2163 airdrop addresses unspent. ~27% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/13 there are left 2143 airdrop addresses unspent. ~28% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/14 there are left 2118 airdrop addresses unspent. ~29% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/15 there are left 2093 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/16 there are left 2069 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/17 there are left 2051 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/18 there are left 2036 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of today 2016/2/19 there are left 2034 airdrop addresses unspent. ~32% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
Yes i checked it twice that's a 2
As of 2016/2/13 there are left 2143 airdrop addresses unspent. ~28% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/14 there are left 2118 airdrop addresses unspent. ~29% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/15 there are left 2093 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/16 there are left 2069 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/17 there are left 2051 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/18 there are left 2036 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of today 2016/2/19 there are left 2034 airdrop addresses unspent. ~32% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
Yes i checked it twice that's a 2
Looking good, only two nonbelievers for today.
Well for now, all the crash and burn nay sayers should read and weep the above stats which are unequivocal
all these guys are holding for reasons only known to them, a continued slow release is healthy for the future
It seems the airdrop has gone quite the opposite that i was expecting it to. I really was thinking that the sales will be a lot higher and the claim rate would be over 80+ at least for now but seems i was very wrong. As for why they haven't claimed yet, maybe they are really interested in the long run. Pretty sure many are also just waiting for a proper GUI wallet so that they could start staking as the other options really just suck.
Maybe these numbers are faked. Sure, "airdrop addresses" exist. But do "airdrop receivers" exist? Who knows?
Checkout the view count: First Decred Block # 1 created Decred is better than Bitcoin
No chance to prove doubters wrong. There will always be doubters.
Sorry if my numbers confirm as to why your numbers.
Sorry, I'm lost. What's your point?
Sure, not meant as dis toward Decred. Also, appreciate your time in posting the depiction.
Your numbers reflect that only ~32% of airdrop recipients have opted to claim their windfall. I merely pointed out that of the few Decred YouTube videos that have been uploaded over time depict über-low view counts putting the actual number of recipients in questions, again, not a dis.
I chose this video because it had the most view counts for the search term "Decred" at the time (and still now) with just over 100 views, now standing at 208, doubled since I linked to it on this thread. I'm just taken aback that the counts (other Decred video don't enjoy view counts over 100) aren't much higher given that folks are expressing issues, hence normally seeking out solutions on boards and, yes, YouTube videos. I contend that the view counts should be no less than 1/3 of the airdrop recipients given that 1/3 have already exited and the other third is well-versed.
Just an observation I'm sharing, accepting any proof of the contrary.
February 20, 2016, 02:31:44 PM
Ok thx I'll have to keep them on the pool then.
If you are an "advanced" user, you can use the desktop client without gui.
For mac, linux, windows and raspberry pi https://github.com/decred/dcrd/releases
February 20, 2016, 02:18:01 PM
Ok thx I'll have to keep them on the pool then.
If you are an "advanced" user, you can use the desktop client without gui.
For mac, linux, windows and raspberry pi https://github.com/decred/dcrd/releases
Once you get the hang of it, it's not too "advanced." It's a lot easier than running some programs on a Commodore 64, or even an Apple II.
February 20, 2016, 02:14:34 PM
We've added Stratum for use at http://pool.mn/dcr with ccminer too:
stratum+tcp://dcr.pool.mn:4800
Thanks oc for the help !
stratum+tcp://dcr.pool.mn:4800
Thanks oc for the help !
February 20, 2016, 02:09:25 PM
Ok thx I'll have to keep them on the pool then.
If you are an "advanced" user, you can use the desktop client without gui.
For mac, linux, windows and raspberry pi https://github.com/decred/dcrd/releases
February 20, 2016, 11:16:40 AM
As of 2016/2/12 there are left 2163 airdrop addresses unspent. ~27% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/13 there are left 2143 airdrop addresses unspent. ~28% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/14 there are left 2118 airdrop addresses unspent. ~29% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/15 there are left 2093 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/16 there are left 2069 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/17 there are left 2051 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/18 there are left 2036 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of today 2016/2/19 there are left 2034 airdrop addresses unspent. ~32% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
Yes i checked it twice that's a 2
As of 2016/2/13 there are left 2143 airdrop addresses unspent. ~28% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/14 there are left 2118 airdrop addresses unspent. ~29% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/15 there are left 2093 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/16 there are left 2069 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/17 there are left 2051 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/18 there are left 2036 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of today 2016/2/19 there are left 2034 airdrop addresses unspent. ~32% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
Yes i checked it twice that's a 2
Looking good, only two nonbelievers for today.
Well for now, all the crash and burn nay sayers should read and weep the above stats which are unequivocal
all these guys are holding for reasons only known to them, a continued slow release is healthy for the future
It seems the airdrop has gone quite the opposite that i was expecting it to. I really was thinking that the sales will be a lot higher and the claim rate would be over 80+ at least for now but seems i was very wrong. As for why they haven't claimed yet, maybe they are really interested in the long run. Pretty sure many are also just waiting for a proper GUI wallet so that they could start staking as the other options really just suck.
Maybe these numbers are faked. Sure, "airdrop addresses" exist. But do "airdrop receivers" exist? Who knows?
Checkout the view count: First Decred Block # 1 created Decred is better than Bitcoin
No chance to prove doubters wrong. There will always be doubters.
Sorry if my numbers confirm as to why your numbers.
Sorry, I'm lost. What's your point?
February 20, 2016, 10:12:29 AM
You are missing that the webwallet for decred is a hybrid and more likely a web client than a web wallet. With the seed you can restore anytime your wallet because it is not stored online. @decred I am proposing to rename webwallet to DCR WebClient as the actual name is leading to a lot of misunderstandings
This has been raised elsewhere as well and should receive attention. The web wallet is a client that runs in your browser. The name can indeed cause confusion thinking the wallet is somehow stored server-side (which is incorrect), so this is a good point to address.
Mate this was said gazillion times already. The coins will be stored in a wallet that is located in your browsers cookies. You can restore that wallet anytime using the seed to a future gui wallet or current cli wallet or another web wallet
February 20, 2016, 09:43:07 AM
Hi decred dev...yes....and I have my coins on the pool....but if I were to use a web client where do the coins go..they wouldn't be on the pool..and some say their not on the web client.. so a GUI wallet is needed badly.
If you use the web wallet, the DCR goes to your wallet on your computer. The web wallet is just an interface - the wallet sits on your own computer. It is a true wallet, not an account service. But yes, a GUI is crucial - it is the reason RFP0001 is about bringing that forward.
February 20, 2016, 09:42:39 AM
You are missing that the webwallet for decred is a hybrid and more likely a web client than a web wallet. With the seed you can restore anytime your wallet because it is not stored online. @decred I am proposing to rename webwallet to DCR WebClient as the actual name is leading to a lot of misunderstandings
This has been raised elsewhere as well and should receive attention. The web wallet is a client that runs in your browser. The name can indeed cause confusion thinking the wallet is somehow stored server-side (which is incorrect), so this is a good point to address.
Mate this was said gazillion times already. The coins will be stored in a wallet that is located in your browsers cookies. You can restore that wallet anytime using the seed to a future gui wallet or current cli wallet or another web wallet
and again: the coins always reside on the blockchain, so indeed, they're on everybody's computer, and only you can access them with your keys. =s keep your seed safe
February 20, 2016, 09:40:38 AM
As of 2016/2/12 there are left 2163 airdrop addresses unspent. ~27% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/13 there are left 2143 airdrop addresses unspent. ~28% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/14 there are left 2118 airdrop addresses unspent. ~29% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/15 there are left 2093 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/16 there are left 2069 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/17 there are left 2051 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/18 there are left 2036 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of today 2016/2/19 there are left 2034 airdrop addresses unspent. ~32% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
Yes i checked it twice that's a 2
As of 2016/2/13 there are left 2143 airdrop addresses unspent. ~28% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/14 there are left 2118 airdrop addresses unspent. ~29% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/15 there are left 2093 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/16 there are left 2069 airdrop addresses unspent. ~30% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/17 there are left 2051 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of 2016/2/18 there are left 2036 airdrop addresses unspent. ~31% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
As of today 2016/2/19 there are left 2034 airdrop addresses unspent. ~32% of Airdrop receivers moved their coins
Yes i checked it twice that's a 2
Looking good, only two nonbelievers for today.
Well for now, all the crash and burn nay sayers should read and weep the above stats which are unequivocal
all these guys are holding for reasons only known to them, a continued slow release is healthy for the future
It seems the airdrop has gone quite the opposite that i was expecting it to. I really was thinking that the sales will be a lot higher and the claim rate would be over 80+ at least for now but seems i was very wrong. As for why they haven't claimed yet, maybe they are really interested in the long run. Pretty sure many are also just waiting for a proper GUI wallet so that they could start staking as the other options really just suck.
Maybe these numbers are faked. Sure, "airdrop addresses" exist. But do "airdrop receivers" exist? Who knows?
Checkout the view count: First Decred Block # 1 created Decred is better than Bitcoin
lol nice find^ ~ poloniex looks spooked by the epic premine! no wallet still? bwaahahaha :-)
February 20, 2016, 09:39:05 AM
You are missing that the webwallet for decred is a hybrid and more likely a web client than a web wallet. With the seed you can restore anytime your wallet because it is not stored online. @decred I am proposing to rename webwallet to DCR WebClient as the actual name is leading to a lot of misunderstandings
This has been raised elsewhere as well and should receive attention. The web wallet is a client that runs in your browser. The name can indeed cause confusion thinking the wallet is somehow stored server-side (which is incorrect), so this is a good point to address.
Mate this was said gazillion times already. The coins will be stored in a wallet that is located in your browsers cookies. You can restore that wallet anytime using the seed to a future gui wallet or current cli wallet or another web wallet
February 20, 2016, 09:36:03 AM
You are missing that the webwallet for decred is a hybrid and more likely a web client than a web wallet. With the seed you can restore anytime your wallet because it is not stored online. @decred I am proposing to rename webwallet to DCR WebClient as the actual name is leading to a lot of misunderstandings
This has been raised elsewhere as well and should receive attention. The web wallet is a client that runs in your browser. The name can indeed cause confusion thinking the wallet is somehow stored server-side (which is incorrect), so this is a good point to address.
February 20, 2016, 09:30:37 AM
You are missing that the webwallet for decred is a hybrid and more likely a web client than a web wallet. With the seed you can restore anytime your wallet because it is not stored online. @decred I am proposing to rename webwallet to DCR WebClient as the actual name is leading to a lot of misunderstandings
This has been raised elsewhere as well and should receive attention. The web wallet is a client that runs in your browser. The name can indeed cause confusion thinking the wallet is somehow stored server-side (which is incorrect), so this is a good point to address.
February 20, 2016, 08:05:29 AM
I have added a port at suprnova for the stratum style connection that tpruvots ccminer uses. Stales/rejects should be a bit better especially with ccminer.
Check http://dcr.suprnova.cc main page for the port and a link to the miner
OC SUPRNOVA no it is worst on the stratum protocol.Check http://dcr.suprnova.cc main page for the port and a link to the miner
Works fine here, if you're having trouble with the stratum port just use the normal one.
There is no "real" stratum for DCR now, it's basically just a getwork-over-stratum (over tcp) connection, so you're mining absolutely same on both ports, one connection is persistent while the other is http based.
February 20, 2016, 08:04:06 AM
I have added a port at suprnova for the stratum style connection that tpruvots ccminer uses. Stales/rejects should be a bit better especially with ccminer.
Check http://dcr.suprnova.cc main page for the port and a link to the miner
OC SUPRNOVA no it is worst on the stratum protocol.Check http://dcr.suprnova.cc main page for the port and a link to the miner
Works fine here, if you're having trouble with the stratum port just use the normal one.
There is no "real" stratum for DCR now, it's basically just a getwork-over-stratum (over tcp) connection, so you're mining absolutely same on both ports, one connection is persistent while the other is http based.
February 20, 2016, 07:06:13 AM
I have added a port at suprnova for the stratum style connection that tpruvots ccminer uses. Stales/rejects should be a bit better especially with ccminer.
Check http://dcr.suprnova.cc main page for the port and a link to the miner
OC SUPRNOVA no it is worst on the stratum protocol.Check http://dcr.suprnova.cc main page for the port and a link to the miner
1.7.3 ccminer with the getwork protocol works good
February 20, 2016, 07:02:02 AM
I'm supporting decred, but this wallet story stuck.
I mean,
How is possible that after 3 years of development and with a expert team working on it in cryptoscene, they didn't have thinked about to release a gui wallet at launch? How is this possible in 2016?
Don't understand if the entire decred team is unable to compile a wallet since they are asking help. how is this posible? Sir,you waited 3 years, why not waited 3 years and 2 months more to get a easy simple wallet release at launch?
A gui wallet in 2106 couldn't be considered an update. It should be availabe from beginning.
What's next? every new altcoin now will release only a cli wallet? It's the new way of this year?
anders lokka I agree with you 100%. There should be a GUI wallet right now...or at launch. I mean,
How is possible that after 3 years of development and with a expert team working on it in cryptoscene, they didn't have thinked about to release a gui wallet at launch? How is this possible in 2016?
Don't understand if the entire decred team is unable to compile a wallet since they are asking help. how is this posible? Sir,you waited 3 years, why not waited 3 years and 2 months more to get a easy simple wallet release at launch?
A gui wallet in 2106 couldn't be considered an update. It should be availabe from beginning.
What's next? every new altcoin now will release only a cli wallet? It's the new way of this year?
Jump to: