Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN]🔴Deviant Coin🔴[DEV] DEVX Airdrop soon! [🔥DEX + H/W wallet coming up🔥] - page 46. (Read 58937 times)

newbie
Activity: 266
Merit: 0
From this project I expect very high speed, as this would play a competitive role for the entire crypto-currency community.
At the moment, the transmission speed is not so important as the security of the channel, I'm sure of it. There is no point in increasing the speed, creating a vulnerability for transactions
Channel security is a relative concept. The fact is that not so long ago each project spoke about the degree of its protection, which is confirmed by the use of appropriate algorithms
member
Activity: 266
Merit: 10
From this project I expect very high speed, as this would play a competitive role for the entire crypto-currency community.
At the moment, the transmission speed is not so important as the security of the channel, I'm sure of it. There is no point in increasing the speed, creating a vulnerability for transactions
newbie
Activity: 266
Merit: 0
From this project I expect very high speed, as this would play a competitive role for the entire crypto-currency community.
full member
Activity: 630
Merit: 111
Dev! Take off the order for spam! do not turn people away from the coin! All this is visible and disgusting to look at how the idiots make them!
newbie
Activity: 126
Merit: 0
An excellent and very interesting project! Tell me, please, what standard will be for your token?
member
Activity: 420
Merit: 10
It seems that you completely forgot that this is one of the most protected projects of the whole community, there is no reason to believe that the user's wallet is unprotected!
He's right! This factor is for many a key when choosing a project for investment! In this way, you can share with your colleagues a project for which there will be no doubt about security
You can continue to believe in these statements, or try chatting with qualified experts in the field of cryptography, and all of you will be told that even the system with Masternodes at this stage of technology development is weak
Give an example of the recall of such a specialist, in which he will say about the weak protection of this project. I can not believe your words, since they are quite empty
newbie
Activity: 238
Merit: 0
It seems that you completely forgot that this is one of the most protected projects of the whole community, there is no reason to believe that the user's wallet is unprotected!
He's right! This factor is for many a key when choosing a project for investment! In this way, you can share with your colleagues a project for which there will be no doubt about security
You can continue to believe in these statements, or try chatting with qualified experts in the field of cryptography, and all of you will be told that even the system with Masternodes at this stage of technology development is weak
newbie
Activity: 266
Merit: 0
It seems that you completely forgot that this is one of the most protected projects of the whole community, there is no reason to believe that the user's wallet is unprotected!
He's right! This factor is for many a key when choosing a project for investment! In this way, you can share with your colleagues a project for which there will be no doubt about security
member
Activity: 420
Merit: 10
It seems that you completely forgot that this is one of the most protected projects of the whole community, there is no reason to believe that the user's wallet is unprotected!
newbie
Activity: 266
Merit: 0

Correctly, I will not trust the project until the end, until the developers provide a working version of their application and wallets, which in turn may be vulnerable
This is absurd! How are you going to prove the vulnerability of wallets? Only if you try to crack one of the user's wallets, and then point out the vulnerability of the development team
Why should I do this? The team has their own testers who receive money for their work. Why should I help the development team, if in the end I do not even get a bonus?
It's your safety! If you think that it is not enough, then you can try to improve it with the help of the development team, if you are capable of it!
newbie
Activity: 238
Merit: 0

Correctly, I will not trust the project until the end, until the developers provide a working version of their application and wallets, which in turn may be vulnerable
This is absurd! How are you going to prove the vulnerability of wallets? Only if you try to crack one of the user's wallets, and then point out the vulnerability of the development team
Why should I do this? The team has their own testers who receive money for their work. Why should I help the development team, if in the end I do not even get a bonus?
newbie
Activity: 266
Merit: 0
Simplified systems to enter the service is always bad! This step threatens the security of our accounts, but in no way makes life easier for employees!
Do not complicate! How so, do you think that the whole system is simplified? But I think the change will only affect the interface and methods of systems
I'm not trying to complicate anything, I'm experienced in these matters, so I'm sure that simplifying the interface always leads to simplified access to the open source code
Access to open source code in fact is a security threat, I agree with you. But at the same time, think about how the developers benefit from having their project poorly protected
That's it, the project team places emphasis on security and on high autonomy at stunning speed, so intermediaries are excluded
in fact, this is possible even today, if the project team would allow data leakage and the information would fall into the wrong hands.
Correctly, I will not trust the project until the end, until the developers provide a working version of their application and wallets, which in turn may be vulnerable
This is absurd! How are you going to prove the vulnerability of wallets? Only if you try to crack one of the user's wallets, and then point out the vulnerability of the development team
newbie
Activity: 238
Merit: 0
Simplified systems to enter the service is always bad! This step threatens the security of our accounts, but in no way makes life easier for employees!
Do not complicate! How so, do you think that the whole system is simplified? But I think the change will only affect the interface and methods of systems
I'm not trying to complicate anything, I'm experienced in these matters, so I'm sure that simplifying the interface always leads to simplified access to the open source code
Access to open source code in fact is a security threat, I agree with you. But at the same time, think about how the developers benefit from having their project poorly protected
That's it, the project team places emphasis on security and on high autonomy at stunning speed, so intermediaries are excluded
in fact, this is possible even today, if the project team would allow data leakage and the information would fall into the wrong hands.
Correctly, I will not trust the project until the end, until the developers provide a working version of their application and wallets, which in turn may be vulnerable
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
friends, I probably have the last question and after that I will assume that I am satisfied with everything in this project. What is the total volume of coins produced and what is the amount of investment that should be required to ensure that the support node functions effectively?
on this occasion I will tell you the following: the total proposal is 88 million coins, and the security node should be in the amount of 5000 DEV coins. I'm with you in the case for participation, so we are waiting for the launch of all the points on the road map! Smiley
newbie
Activity: 266
Merit: 0
Simplified systems to enter the service is always bad! This step threatens the security of our accounts, but in no way makes life easier for employees!
Do not complicate! How so, do you think that the whole system is simplified? But I think the change will only affect the interface and methods of systems
I'm not trying to complicate anything, I'm experienced in these matters, so I'm sure that simplifying the interface always leads to simplified access to the open source code
Access to open source code in fact is a security threat, I agree with you. But at the same time, think about how the developers benefit from having their project poorly protected
That's it, the project team places emphasis on security and on high autonomy at stunning speed, so intermediaries are excluded
in fact, this is possible even today, if the project team would allow data leakage and the information would fall into the wrong hands.
But this is just an assumption, in fact the developers of the project are the most qualified programmers and administrators who will not allow leaks from their servers
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 10
friends, I probably have the last question and after that I will assume that I am satisfied with everything in this project. What is the total volume of coins produced and what is the amount of investment that should be required to ensure that the support node functions effectively?
member
Activity: 266
Merit: 10
about the properties, I assume that these are fast, inexpensive and secure transactions that have similar advantages due to the networked master wizards and their specific tasks.
also note that the limited emission of these coins will allow them to increase their value more quickly, but they will have the same advantages described above. Moreover, these are low commissions, complete anonymity and encrypted messages.
everything is just like in the movie for spies Smiley but in general, it's the other way around, since transactions can be made at fantastic amounts and, probably, no user would like to advertise their data and their presence on the platform.
member
Activity: 420
Merit: 10
Simplified systems to enter the service is always bad! This step threatens the security of our accounts, but in no way makes life easier for employees!
Do not complicate! How so, do you think that the whole system is simplified? But I think the change will only affect the interface and methods of systems
I'm not trying to complicate anything, I'm experienced in these matters, so I'm sure that simplifying the interface always leads to simplified access to the open source code
Access to open source code in fact is a security threat, I agree with you. But at the same time, think about how the developers benefit from having their project poorly protected
That's it, the project team places emphasis on security and on high autonomy at stunning speed, so intermediaries are excluded
in fact, this is possible even today, if the project team would allow data leakage and the information would fall into the wrong hands.
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 10
about the properties, I assume that these are fast, inexpensive and secure transactions that have similar advantages due to the networked master wizards and their specific tasks.
also note that the limited emission of these coins will allow them to increase their value more quickly, but they will have the same advantages described above. Moreover, these are low commissions, complete anonymity and encrypted messages.
member
Activity: 266
Merit: 10
about the properties, I assume that these are fast, inexpensive and secure transactions that have similar advantages due to the networked master wizards and their specific tasks.
Pages:
Jump to: