Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][DIGI] 2015 - 2017 (and currently) laboratory phase - page 10. (Read 16952 times)

full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
Taking part into a monetary revolution - Priceless
LOL -- deposit in - cash out.


Have you any concrete fact or are you writing what you imagine yourself?
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 504
LOL -- deposit in - cash out.

full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
Taking part into a monetary revolution - Priceless
We have been faced little issues by trading execution for last 4 hours and engineers from draglet have been working on this. Currently it seems that the issue is resolved.
full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
Taking part into a monetary revolution - Priceless
Your located in the UK, but the message on your website states Polish:

''Ten serwis wykorzystuje pliki cookies. Korzystanie z witryny oznacza zgodę na ich zapis lub odczyt wg ustawień przeglądarki.''

Who are behind this coin? Names? It's all legal right?

Registered in Cyprus?
http://www.cyprus-data.com/product/368036/kvadratco-services-limited.html

Yes, we are registered in Cyprus as stated in our Terms&Conditions, on 23th January we have started a branch office in London, UK, so we are in the registration process for Companies House there. http://www.cyprus-data.com/product/368036/kvadratco-services-limited.html provides the actual information about us. You can find there anything about the company.
For all DIGI platform (capitalDIGI.com + coinDIGI.org + crowdonDIGI.com) have worked designers and programmers from Germany, Poland, India, Czech, USA and Moldavia, so there is possibility that you find sometimes messages in domestic languages. Thank you for the information about that this information about cookie is published in Polish, we will check it and correct it.

I don't understand your question about is this all legal right?
Are you a newbie in cryptocurrencies? 
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
Your located in the UK, but the message on your website states Polish:

''Ten serwis wykorzystuje pliki cookies. Korzystanie z witryny oznacza zgodę na ich zapis lub odczyt wg ustawień przeglądarki.''

Who are behind this coin? Names? It's all legal right?

Registered in Cyprus?
http://www.cyprus-data.com/product/368036/kvadratco-services-limited.html
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
The data does indeed speak for itself
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 504

Ok - good luck with your coin.  The data speaks for itself - miners will figure it out.

full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
Taking part into a monetary revolution - Priceless
Perhaps hdmediaservices is just fudding to try and stop others mining the coin

I think everyone is capable of doing the math themselves.  

Basically, this coin will produce what is claimed -- ONLY -- when:

1.  The difficulty is under 10 all the time

2.  If you sell your coins very very slowly, so that you can take advantage of the very few buys in the 1600's (that seem to mysteriously appear just at the right time on their own exchange).

Hey - if anything, mine this coin - put all of your hash towards it.  This way it takes your hash away from other more profitable coins that have a much larger trade volume on several exchanges.


hdmediaservices, please less slogans, more details of math calculation.
For example for last 4 hours the network power of DIGI is under 700 Mhs, so there is clear that less than 700Mhs for last 4 hours made around 1/6 of daily 15 x 1440 DIGI x 0.000016 BTC =  0.0576 BTC.
What are concretely the production by 700Mhs for last 4 hours in the mysterious "other more profitable coins" you mentioned? I think about script PoW similar of DIGI.
If you don't want to mine DIGI then don't do it. But don't use slogans by "educating" other miners of DIGI. I think your only one interest is to make they will not mine DIGI instead to have a good efforts by DIGI.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 504
Perhaps hdmediaservices is just fudding to try and stop others mining the coin

I think everyone is capable of doing the math themselves. 

Basically, this coin will produce what is claimed -- ONLY -- when:

1.  The difficulty is under 10 all the time

2.  If you sell your coins very very slowly, so that you can take advantage of the very few buys in the 1600's (that seem to mysteriously appear just at the right time on their own exchange).

Hey - if anything, mine this coin - put all of your hash towards it.  This way it takes your hash away from other more profitable coins that have a much larger trade volume on several exchanges.


sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Perhaps hdmediaservices is just fudding to try and stop others mining the coin
full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
Taking part into a monetary revolution - Priceless
My hashrate varies hdmediaservices but in general I get around the % blocks that corresponds to my hashrate. I generally sell at the best price that will fill my order completely. Regardless of how it works out though it is definitely more profitable to mine this than LTC.

Well most alt coins are more profitable than LTC - we all know that.  Plus if you mine LTC for just 24 hours, then you will make very little - due to variance. 

But this guy - is serving up a bunch of bull.  It is silly.  And then to say we will recheck the #'s over the weekend.  What is to recheck?  They are inflating their mining #'s big time.

Whatever - such a scam coin.


Hi hdmediaservices,

You will see till Sunday what we are rechecking and recalculating, after that we will publish the info, so please wait for it with patience.
Your rights to write anything on the forum, but we are going ahead as we have it clearly described. Obviously please go with DIGI if you wish, or please go your another way if DIGI disappointed you, no issues.

hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 504
My hashrate varies hdmediaservices but in general I get around the % blocks that corresponds to my hashrate. I generally sell at the best price that will fill my order completely. Regardless of how it works out though it is definitely more profitable to mine this than LTC.

Well most alt coins are more profitable than LTC - we all know that.  Plus if you mine LTC for just 24 hours, then you will make very little - due to variance. 

But this guy - is serving up a bunch of bull.  It is silly.  And then to say we will recheck the #'s over the weekend.  What is to recheck?  They are inflating their mining #'s big time.

Whatever - such a scam coin.

 
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
My hashrate varies hdmediaservices but in general I get around the % blocks that corresponds to my hashrate. I generally sell at the best price that will fill my order completely. Regardless of how it works out though it is definitely more profitable to mine this than LTC.
full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
Taking part into a monetary revolution - Priceless

I'm not sure what hash James put behind it and how he sold the coins, but he certainly didn't make this amount over the last 24 hours at 100Mh/s.  Perhaps he was hashing at 20Mh/s and the few coins he made were enough to sell at the highest price.  But even that still doesn't make sense.

This is so bogus and you know it. 

You should use an average median price of the 24 hour period, not the last price, as one could easily put in a buy order for 10 DIGI at 1602 sats.  Total manipulation.

My miners are configured just fine.  I mine all types of Scrypt coins - solo and pooled.

If the difficulty stayed at 10 to 15 through out the day - then sure maybe your estimate is close, but the difficulty was all over the place - going as high as 60.

I can understand having your estimate off by say 10% to 15% -- but not more than 50%.



Thank you for the interest and for the information. So we have to investigate the overall network efficiency and to make a comparison to parameters of PoW for DIGI. As I mentioned in last post we are going to make it at weekend to check the estimation is to be modified. I will inform about results of this not later than on Sunday.

The thing has interested us so very that we are discussing it as a hot topic in our team.
There isn't a final decision, but a first impression is that maybe an official price of DIGI should not be linked only to the array of parameters {BTC/GBP; power of network; crowdtrading capitalization} but adjusted by difficulty shift ratio into {BTC/GBP; power of network; crowdtrading capitalization; minimum maximum difficulty} what will drive to solve dilemma mentioned by hdmediaservices (thank you once again for the input). As I wrote it several minutes ago - we will investigate it later during weekend to find the optimal calculation.

This my message is only typed for an information that there is a fresh impression that investigation will lead to the once much appreciation DIGI to BTC after final calculations. This message is for these guys who want to sell DIGI today or tomorrow to BTC - maybe there is a sense to wait for final calculations and this probable DIGI appreciation.     
full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
Taking part into a monetary revolution - Priceless

I'm not sure what hash James put behind it and how he sold the coins, but he certainly didn't make this amount over the last 24 hours at 100Mh/s.  Perhaps he was hashing at 20Mh/s and the few coins he made were enough to sell at the highest price.  But even that still doesn't make sense.

This is so bogus and you know it. 

You should use an average median price of the 24 hour period, not the last price, as one could easily put in a buy order for 10 DIGI at 1602 sats.  Total manipulation.

My miners are configured just fine.  I mine all types of Scrypt coins - solo and pooled.

If the difficulty stayed at 10 to 15 through out the day - then sure maybe your estimate is close, but the difficulty was all over the place - going as high as 60.

I can understand having your estimate off by say 10% to 15% -- but not more than 50%.



Thank you for the interest and for the information. So we have to investigate the overall network efficiency and to make a comparison to parameters of PoW for DIGI. As I mentioned in last post we are going to make it at weekend to check the estimation is to be modified. I will inform about results of this not later than on Sunday.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 504

I'm not sure what hash James put behind it and how he sold the coins, but he certainly didn't make this amount over the last 24 hours at 100Mh/s.  Perhaps he was hashing at 20Mh/s and the few coins he made were enough to sell at the highest price.  But even that still doesn't make sense.

This is so bogus and you know it. 

You should use an average median price of the 24 hour period, not the last price, as one could easily put in a buy order for 10 DIGI at 1602 sats.  Total manipulation.

My miners are configured just fine.  I mine all types of Scrypt coins - solo and pooled.

If the difficulty stayed at 10 to 15 through out the day - then sure maybe your estimate is close, but the difficulty was all over the place - going as high as 60.

I can understand having your estimate off by say 10% to 15% -- but not more than 50%.

full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
Taking part into a monetary revolution - Priceless
Does it really matter? The difficulty adjusts pretty well to keep the blocks on target

Well his quote for DIGI mining with 100Mh/s @ .02722 BTC / day is very unrealistic.

1.  Most DIGIs are selling in the 1500's -- definitely not 1602 (except for a random 15 or 50 here and there)

2.  The difficulty corrects itself after every 4 to 8 blocks -- perhaps it is KGW.  So the difficulty went from 10 to 41 (and everything in between) just in the last 30 minutes.

I ran a solid 24 hour test with an average of 400Mh/s -- everything confirmed and I made a total of .0444 BTC selling every coin automatically at the highest price available.

According to his figures -- it should have been .10888.  I did not make 1/2 that - so the figures he quotes are nonsense.




Hi hdmediaservices again ,

This is difficult for me to say why your figures don't match estimation when James' figures match them. Maybe configuration of miners? I propose you can send a PM to James to discuss about any technical aspects of miners configuration?
By publishing the daily efficiency we use to calculate the last official price, because we don't have possibility to estimate +/- 20% ASK/BID differencies.
You can try set several ASK offers to wait for their executions instead of selling everything as a market taker - the efficiency as a market maker should be several %points higher what I suppose.

What I think more - we can investigate the overall network efficiency as a comparison to parameters of the PoW algorithm for DIGI. Having such data we can check once again this estimation (it will be done at weekend).       
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 504
Does it really matter? The difficulty adjusts pretty well to keep the blocks on target. My figures match yours Mario

How much hash do you have James?

full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
Taking part into a monetary revolution - Priceless
Does it really matter? The difficulty adjusts pretty well to keep the blocks on target

Well his quote for DIGI mining with 100Mh/s @ .02722 BTC / day is very unrealistic.

1.  Most DIGIs are selling in the 1500's -- definitely not 1602 (except for a random 15 or 50 here and there)

2.  The difficulty corrects itself after every 4 to 8 blocks -- perhaps it is KGW.  So the difficulty went from 10 to 41 (and everything in between) just in the last 30 minutes.

I ran a solid 24 hour test with an average of 400Mh/s -- everything confirmed and I made a total of .0444 BTC selling every coin automatically at the highest price available.

According to his figures -- it should have been .10888.  I did not make 1/2 that - so the figures he quotes are nonsense.




Hi hdmediaservices again ,

This is difficult for me to say why your figures don't match estimation when James' figures match them. Maybe configuration of miners? I propose you can send a PM to James to discuss about any technical aspects of miners configuration?
By publishing the daily efficiency we use to calculate the last official price, because we don't have possibility to estimate +/- 20% ASK/BID differencies.
You can try set several ASK offers to wait for their executions instead of selling everything as a market taker - the efficiency as a market maker should be several %points higher what I suppose.
full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
Taking part into a monetary revolution - Priceless
Does it really matter? The difficulty adjusts pretty well to keep the blocks on target. My figures match yours Mario

Yes, at this moment for:
- young maturity of DIGI
- short time of the DIGI difficulty re-targeting (look for example difficulty for blocks between 24250 and 24257)
the power parameter of network is a crucial point to calculate the efficiency. Currently discussion about difficulty is more important for a single block than for the production in a day.
Good that our estimations match James' observation of the production.
    
Pages:
Jump to: