Topic: [ANN][EMC2] Einsteinium | FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY - page 113. (Read 1076396 times)

freaking mintpal ran away with my EMC2...

In the original formula it's E=mc^2, not c2. These are mathematically two different things and it hurts my brain to use "EMC2". Just make sure you at least say "squared" instead of "two".. 

Yes but this is what every coin says.
I used to invest in coins that were simply ideas, not complete products, and it was a bad decision. These days I don't put my money in dreams any more. But many people do, and it's because of Bitcoin. We all want to be that guy who bought Bitcoin 5 years ago, and we're now trying to do it with altcoins.

Yes, I can confirm someone made that in Photoshop to keep the price up. I couldn't find that pic anywhere else on the internet.

This is not a religion, it's an investment. Investments should be questioned at all times, it's for your own good. Damn, people are so gullible I'm almost tempted to make my own coin and just say it's a great new invention but it's still in development.. 

Bittrex & Poloniex are secure options as well. 

That's a pitty, but I do support the believe there is plenty of potential for growth.

On short notice the top 25 seems within reach, that could be +80%.

On a longer term the top 15 is possible, although I also expect the current cryptocurrencies within that positions will rise in value.

Within 2 months the top 20 will have a market cap of over 1.5 billion minimum each.

If we can be keep on growing considering the current volume, 300%+ seems plausible.

I have question guys, Do you transfer your emc2 funds to einsteinium wallet? hard fork is coming. I  read positive news from here. Thanks

Google trends

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=einsteinium
Sweden #1 in interest.

Swedish Research Council Website
https://www.vr.se/inenglish/researchfunding/applyforgrants/theswedishsystemofresearchfunding.4.aad30e310abcb9735780007228.html

"Sweden is among the nations worldwide that devote the most money to research relative to its population. Sweden's expenditures for R&D is total 3.42% of GDP."

"Private funding sources
In addition to public sources of funding, Sweden has private funding sources, foundations, and fundraising organisations. Several are major stakeholders in the research sphere and provide substantial grants for research in their respective fields. Collectively, private non profit organisations contribute SEK 3.3 billion to Swedish research."

Just contributing what I thought was some interesting info...

I should have kept my Einsteinium when I bought some a few months back ... too bad I didn't follow the project back then

Can anybody confirm this?

I am really excited for December 19th! 

https://twitter.com/einsteiniumcoin/status/936182110515326981

Have yo took your time to search for roadmap, at least?
Afaik, current team's working on coin development for last year or so. Not sure how many (if any) of them are from original crew.

It's trollhour here  

Goldsheik, Lessartist...

I gave up with the syncing , because was not syncing at all. and i used coinomi wallet. I know that is better to hold the coins in the official core but was not syncing at all. Coinomi for me worked perfectly.

Again, don't look for super deep meaning. It could've been Einstein coin, but there's ton of xyz COIN's. I find it refreshing it's not "coin", "bit" or something similar. It is a marketing move and I like it.

In order to include scientists, in a way it was intended, you must have (almost) fully operational platform. That's the best part with dev team. They never did rush movements. If something wasn't ready, they were never ashamed to admit it. Instead, they stepped on it, and came out with news, when job was done in a proper way.

First of all, true scientist wouldn't go around pointing out own "scientific status" and just because of that, making own point of view as only correct one, by default. That's not science. That's arrogance and egocentrism.

"Beauty" of the name is in the eye of the beholder. Personally, I find it excellent. Especially with EMC2 ticker. Simply brilliant. Name/ticker/symbol should be catchy and easy to remember, but still distinctive in ALT sea.

If you had done some real research (appropriate to real scientist), you'd find out that coin is still in development stage. Full potential would be seen, idk, in a year(?). No one ever said that dev team member are ones who would decide how to distribute funds. In fact, it is stated diametrical opposite of what you said. What you said is either lack of (scientific  ) research or a blatant lie. I assume "science people" would make some kind of shortlist of good sci projects, needed to be funded. Maybe community would pick one of those.
But I do understand your way of thinking. You are the kind of man who would object, no matter which project's would get funds. You'd be always ranting "why this and not that", although both projects would be good enough to be funded. Just like you're asking why Einstein and not Newton. Guess what, you have to start somewhere. If you lived 3.500 B.C. you would probably root for square instead wheels...

Either DYO PROPER! R, or spare us of your "objectivity".

Just answer these questions:

1. The devs. Are they scientists and what is their status in the science community? If they plan to give out money to prospective scientists, they need to know what's going on in the science world, or else they'll end up donating money to the wrong people.

2. The partners. Why are there no real scientific communities behind this project? Only "BlueLab" and "Chainwork Industries" which have no effect in the scientific research field. How about having something like the Planetary Society behind the coin?

3. Who have the devs donated money to, and how much? What was the criteria for giving money to these people?

4. What is the main purpose of this coin? If the main point is to give money to promising science projects, why not collect money directly to science instead of making people buy a coin? Unless certain people wanted to make billions in the process, of course..


Just type "Einsteinium" into Google and you'll find that you get results for two things with the same name. How hard was it to come up with a unique name like Bitcoin or Litecoin? Even Sciencecoin would've been better.

Two notable points here: the voting does not take place yet and we're living on the promise that one day it will, and just think about this for a while: how much does your typical EMC2 holder know about the science community? Most investors are 15-year-olds from developed countries that are trying to get rich.

I'm sorry if I sound like a douche, but please keep in mind that since you guys have invested in this, you're the ones with an emotional, thus irrational, attachment to this coin. I look at it from an objective standpoint.

That would be because ETH is not a currency - it's a crypto fuel for smart contracts. It serves a real purpose as a token. BTC gives value to all the other cryptos.

You sort of made my next point yourself without even realizing it amidst your emotional rant: why is your coin named after Einstein instead of Newton, for example? I think Newton is the greatest scientist our world has seen, and many would agree. He's definitely my favorite and his impact on science was the greatest so far. Get my point? It's stupid to name the coin after a scientist because people don't agree on who it should be. I think it should be named after me or Newton, as I will surely derive the theory of everything.

You make some valid points but also come across as an arrogant dumbass.  Please consider these counterpoints:

0. You can make your points without any arrogance or condescension; try it some time, it really is possible.  (Can't promise I'll set an example today, but I've done it before I swear!)

1. The name: Just exactly who is going to be confused?  PhD's in chemistry?  Anyone learned enough to even know the element exists is going to have enough brain cells to distinguish based on context.  It's not exactly an everyday part of our lives ("honey, we have guests, let's put out the einsteiniumware").  It would be different if it was a universally known element, like Carbon... oh wait, Apple already used that to name an API of theirs.  Can you imagine all the programmers who were wandering around confused for years, trying to keep the Apple API and the chemical element separated in their minds!  Oh yeah, now I remember -- that didn't happen at all, everything was fine.

2. First, it isn't an idea that fails if the absolute best possible choice for the grants aren't made -- otherwise the entire scientific establishment's grant process could be judged a failure.  There are many different grant programs in the world, none perfect, so why try to nitpick a potential new source of grants?  The more grant money the better.  Secondly, it is my understanding that holders of EMC2 tokens will get to vote on the spending, not the devs.  Guess you'd know that if you'd done a little research before shooting your mouth off.  What field did you say you were in again?  Does it require knowing how to do research?  Did they teach you how to do that yet?  Maybe next semester they'll walk you through it.

3. I don't plan on buying groceries with Ethereum, or even Bitcoin for that matter (until / unless they fix their scaling problems), but it doesn't mean those coins don't have value, or use cases.

But I think the absolute dumbest thing you said had nothing to do with the coin.  You don't hold Einstein in particularly high regard?  And you claim to be studying to be a scientist?  How much science have you actually learned yet?  A century after one of if not the greatest intellectual insight in human history, no-one has been able to better his theory.  Not for lack of trying either.  Utter failure by all the scientists in the world working on fundamental physics to either unify the other physical theories with relativity, or replace it.  500 years from now, people will remember Einstein's name, as they do Newton today.  No-one will remember you.  If Einstein was alive today, he would not even know you exist.  But thanks for registering your thoughts with the general public.  Now we know some random guy doesn't care for Einstein.  There's no love lost the other way, believe me.

So far you have provided zero real arguments for this coin. Just smileys, lolling and bad grammar. Wow what a bunch of investors and scientists..



..aaaand the eventual ad hominem appears. Even Einstein would be ashamed of this project. And yes, Dubaicoin is the same level of coin as this Einsteincoin whatever, both unusable and pointless.
Bitcoin is the only coin that matters, everything else is just an attempt to make free money.


You do realize this is a coin that revolves around science? It matters a lot how the science community sees this coin.

The same problem

Has anyone downloaded the official wallet? who can help me? Thank you

Good to see EMC2 still trading nicely above $2, I guess we are getting ready for another increase! Very excited what will happen after the announcement!

Nice south park meme, thats what I always try to tell people when they hear something on the mainstream media about crypto or bitcoin and want to tell me that what they learned there is the truth. Im always like: dude, thats mainstream media, just do the opposit of what they say and you will do alright!