I'll keep the coins i've managed to retain with the hope that the development team looks to appeal to a more causal user base with the aim of minimal profit for the vast majority of users vs the current model of a ton of profit for a few individuals at the expense of attracting newcomers and building the brand.
I'm 100% with you about this, since day0 the game started to go from a "give all a chance to gain a penny" to "give few the most"
I'm not saying this was 100% wanted, but mostly because of
- raising a lot the player cost creation (from 1 HUC for 3 hunter to 205 HUC for a hunter)
- having very expensive fees (20 huc for destruct)
- giving always less importance to the "coin collector" task (even with the risk of a rumored idea even to raise simple moves tx fee)
- causing the disaster to wipe out the hunter cost completely (luckily this has been removed in the last fork)
the result is what you are saying: few winner, many losers
i said i don't think it was 100% wanted because some decision were taken to limit hunter creations or limit transactions and blockchain bloating, but i think that a technical problem shouldn't impact on the gameplay level (and more game difficulty on pvp and pruning will be the probable solutions to those 2 problems) but at some extent snailbrain idea is about having big rewards and this lead for sure to "few winners" and his way to limit transactions is always thoward "let's increase player cost, fees, etc.."
this post shows his thougths, dated March 19 (MM of course is me)
I originally wanted to increase cost to 50-100 HUCs + Disaster when it was first implimented (we would have been in the situation we are in now a year ago - maybe that's not good or bad)..
MM wanted low cost 1-2 HUCs and to work from that direction - making it very cheap to play for all players
There were several reasons i wanted to increase costs and not just involving bots -- and probably several reasons MM didn't want to.
I've to say I respect a lot the huntercoin daemon developer, @domob, for his work on this project and his attitude, unlucky he's not a huntercoin player so he can't have a focused view on the problems, I would have liked to know his thoughts about these problems, I've a feels that he would have been more thoward the "more fair distribution"
I've always been a sponsor of the "give all a chance to win even 0.0001$" but snailbrain actually is at the right opposite side, and forum posts we exchanged over the last year on huntercoin forum are there to be read (e.g. i wrote that a player would be happy to have a chance to win very few and will play the game, rather than risk losing a lot in few minutes.
Player investment need to be protected, and newcomers even more. BGB times ago wrote on huntercoin forum about having 3 different region on the map for different kind of players (in one region you can compete for harvest coins and can't be killed, in the inner one you compete in a kind of pvp arena and the middle zone is a mix
Unlucky it seems i was almost the one that wrote constantly on the forum, trying to set snailbrain on another route, so i think that if players don't agree about the current implementation and the direction the game is taking, then it should be a community that should say its thoughts about that
Unlucky I don't see a responsive community atm and so the decision is taken straight from snailbrain ideas.
Discussions on huntercoin forums end always in the same way, with snailbrain saying "please agree trying my proposal", and since no one object that except me, and even I giveup after spending 1 month talking on the same things with me saying A and snailbrain B, i always said "ok" to at least move something, without agreeing at all
Even if snailbrain says i'm mad for whatever reason (maybe just because my ideas are different from his ones and i talk about that writing long detailed posts) i'm not against him personally at all, I'm actually pretty calm and just objective and i'd love to see huntercoin successfull, otherwise why would i have invested so much time on that?
And when i said few days ago that my suggestion wasn't listened to, i waas refering to the simple snailbrain behaviour explained above, just take a read at the Development forum ( http://forum.huntercoin.org/index.php/board,5.0.html ) on old posts and you'll read that i always said "please don't do this change, that would be worse than now" and never been listened to, i proposed alternatives but never implemented if not on the next fork, to repair the damage.
I ensure to you that speaking to the void even giving good advices and arguments is something very depressing and i ended up not replying to the forum for a while because of this, it was really a waste of time and energies, and seeing changes being eventually added on the next fork to repair damage is the killing blow (e.g. disaster "coin steal" removed, 1x attack range are example of "too late implemented" changes)
So again, if you don't like current implementation and game direction, please talk about that and don't let me be the only voice against this, even because i'm really close to giving up again.
Let your voice be heard, and please say if you are actually a player (or have recently played) or not, because advices about people that just have bought HUCS as investment can't have a good point of view of the game itself (and i think they would be more than happy to have more player playing the game)
It would sound funny to me to know that most people would think current direction is the right one, because history and current playerbase (null) are pointing to another direction (and this should be already a significant bell that should sounds saying "hey, wrong direction, please turn back on trail")
@ snailbrain: you can think whatever you want about me but i'm 100% genuine and i've nothing vs your personally, i'm just against your ideas and some of your behaviours vs the community (e.g. don't listen who is saying something different).
I just want the best for huntercoin game, the concept is nice, the game actually isn't (and negating this wouldn't be objective) and the players decreased at every fork (and this is statistically assured.
I hope that a public post like this could change things, because every time i tried to speak with you in skype or whatever, it didn't changed anything
And don't forget all the players that said the same thing in the past and now don't follow the coin anymore because of your toxic replies to them (e.g. redbean, that was a positive player but you tagged him as a troll, or BGB that gave up playing the game, or people that sometime, like entropycoin here, say something important but isn't considered at the end, etc...)