If it is a really good project I think you shouldn't have too many problems to convince a large exchange to list you as they can also see the potential. At least that is how it should be. And bad projects shouldn't be able to afford the fee or get listed anyway.
I know some good project for which the listing for Binance is not available. At the same time, let me recall the BitConnect.
How is this explained?
The assumption "I think you shouldn't have too many problems to convince a large exchange to list you as they can also see the potential. At least that is how it should be. And bad projects shouldn't be able to afford the fee or get listed anyway." is incorrect. I gave an example of possible situations that show the opposite of this assumption.
There are always exceptions to the rule, but in general that is how it is supposed to work. There are a few other factors that play a role though, too.
Of course, but the rules in crypto quickly change. Since the beginning of the year, the market has been falling two months. Many good projects did not raise enough funds for their development. ICOs was postponed, stretched, but this did not help much. Thus, in order to survive, they are compelled to save money. Listing on big exchanges 5-20 BTC.
I hope this situation is already changing.
Maybe the market is more careful. Saying that good projects did not raise enough funds would mean that the market is doing a bad job. I don't believe that. I believe that many projects are overvalued and the market now comes to the same conclusion.
Last year really confirmed a large reassessment of many digital projects. Therefore, this year the teams are preparing more carefully.
Right but I don't think that the process of reassessing projects is over yet. There will be some huge disappointments when the market comes to the conclusion that some projects are really worthless.
