Topic: [ANN][ICO] MARK.SPACE - 3D/VR ecosystem on blockchain - page 128. (Read 162087 times)
I think it’s not a bad choice to fix the price in usd. People have still time to invest in the ico, and the project is very intéressant I think so more money can be raised like. I’m impatient to see the ecosystem working.
So, now price $0,0833 and fixed in usd? This is a good decision to fix price in usd. Less risk for investors and devs as well.
I do not know if this is good .. And if later ETH grows in price? Fixing the price in dollars is good for developers, but for those who buy tokens - this is a dubious solution.
So, now price $0,0833 and fixed in usd? This is a good decision to fix price in usd. Less risk for investors and devs as well.
so it will be cheaper in the near future - because courses will rise soon
What do you mean it will be cheaper in the future? What exactly are you comparing?
I think he means the investments are going to be more profitable
So, now price $0,0833 and fixed in usd? This is a good decision to fix price in usd. Less risk for investors and devs as well.
ya better than fix follow eth or bitcoin price. see many project last year fix price follow eth. and they say they get x2 x3 and forget eth x5 alreadyWhen the price fixed to btc or eth and the fluctuation is in the good trend, then it will be good for the project. But what if the fluctuation is on the down trend like today? This for sure will give a headache for the team. USD is much more stable and I think to fix the price in USD is better.
So, now price $0,0833 and fixed in usd? This is a good decision to fix price in usd. Less risk for investors and devs as well.
so it will be cheaper in the near future - because courses will rise soon
What do you mean it will be cheaper in the future? What exactly are you comparing?
they must reach a compromise maybe a lower resolution of the objects in 3D but with a greater interactivity, put the price of tokens in usd is the best thing considering the current fluctuations of the crypto market...
Hi team, with the slow adoption rate of vr, when do you guys see this actually kicking off? Have any big companies showed interest in buying space on your platform yet? I've seen Nike and Sony store in the demo, are they just for demo purposes? Thanks
actually better time to buy more when ETH price are low. Mark.Space is good platform in VR space and worth looking into
That's exactly what I did.
actually better time to buy more when ETH price are low. Mark.Space is good platform in VR space and worth looking into
Is it? does the token price decrease accordingly? Or you just mean it's cheaper in terms of fixed fiat currency equivalent?
actually better time to buy more when ETH price are low. Mark.Space is good platform in VR space and worth looking into
There are 4 days, give or take, left for token sale's second round, do you actually know how many rounds there are and when will finish?
So, now price $0,0833 and fixed in usd? This is a good decision to fix price in usd. Less risk for investors and devs as well.
ya better than fix follow eth or bitcoin price. see many project last year fix price follow eth. and they say they get x2 x3 and forget eth x5 alreadySo, now price $0,0833 and fixed in usd? This is a good decision to fix price in usd. Less risk for investors and devs as well.
so it will be cheaper in the near future - because courses will rise soon
The defining feature of MarkSpace I think is the high res rendered VR using 3D scanned objects that runs on everything better than a potato, but it also has some drawbacks as far as I know. If it's prerendered you can't have a lot of interactivity. For that you'd have to move to real time VR, which has many drawbacks like having to use powerful computers and high development costs for modeling and animating. It's a trade off but there's room for both.
It's still a relatively new technology and there's plenty room for development. It's still a lot of stuff that needs to be done in order to make VR accessible for end consumers and MarkSpace is doing a great job.
I think Mark.Space will be a leader in this technology, that started early so they are/will be ahead of their competitors in the market and with their vision more and more people can use VR technology.
Correct me if im wrong, but i think there are no competitors in the same segement as Mark.Space currently?!
You could consider Decentraland a competitor maybe.
it does vibe made it too but mark is so different they won't get in each others way
The defining feature of MarkSpace I think is the high res rendered VR using 3D scanned objects that runs on everything better than a potato, but it also has some drawbacks as far as I know. If it's prerendered you can't have a lot of interactivity. For that you'd have to move to real time VR, which has many drawbacks like having to use powerful computers and high development costs for modeling and animating. It's a trade off but there's room for both.
It's still a relatively new technology and there's plenty room for development. It's still a lot of stuff that needs to be done in order to make VR accessible for end consumers and MarkSpace is doing a great job.
I think Mark.Space will be a leader in this technology, that started early so they are/will be ahead of their competitors in the market and with their vision more and more people can use VR technology.
Correct me if im wrong, but i think there are no competitors in the same segement as Mark.Space currently?!
You could consider Decentraland a competitor maybe.
The defining feature of MarkSpace I think is the high res rendered VR using 3D scanned objects that runs on everything better than a potato, but it also has some drawbacks as far as I know. If it's prerendered you can't have a lot of interactivity. For that you'd have to move to real time VR, which has many drawbacks like having to use powerful computers and high development costs for modeling and animating. It's a trade off but there's room for both.
It's still a relatively new technology and there's plenty room for development. It's still a lot of stuff that needs to be done in order to make VR accessible for end consumers and MarkSpace is doing a great job.
I think Mark.Space will be a leader in this technology, that started early so they are/will be ahead of their competitors in the market and with their vision more and more people can use VR technology.
Correct me if im wrong, but i think there are no competitors in the same segement as Mark.Space currently?!
You could consider Decentraland a competitor maybe.
The defining feature of MarkSpace I think is the high res rendered VR using 3D scanned objects that runs on everything better than a potato, but it also has some drawbacks as far as I know. If it's prerendered you can't have a lot of interactivity. For that you'd have to move to real time VR, which has many drawbacks like having to use powerful computers and high development costs for modeling and animating. It's a trade off but there's room for both.
It's still a relatively new technology and there's plenty room for development. It's still a lot of stuff that needs to be done in order to make VR accessible for end consumers and MarkSpace is doing a great job.
I think Mark.Space will be a leader in this technology, that started early so they are/will be ahead of their competitors in the market and with their vision more and more people can use VR technology.
Correct me if im wrong, but i think there are no competitors in the same segement as Mark.Space currently?!
I don't know one off the top of my head but I remember there was a post about competitors weeks ago so I assume they exist. It is good that they are not well known though.
The defining feature of MarkSpace I think is the high res rendered VR using 3D scanned objects that runs on everything better than a potato, but it also has some drawbacks as far as I know. If it's prerendered you can't have a lot of interactivity. For that you'd have to move to real time VR, which has many drawbacks like having to use powerful computers and high development costs for modeling and animating. It's a trade off but there's room for both.
It's still a relatively new technology and there's plenty room for development. It's still a lot of stuff that needs to be done in order to make VR accessible for end consumers and MarkSpace is doing a great job.
I think Mark.Space will be a leader in this technology, that started early so they are/will be ahead of their competitors in the market and with their vision more and more people can use VR technology.
Correct me if im wrong, but i think there are no competitors in the same segement as Mark.Space currently?!
The defining feature of MarkSpace I think is the high res rendered VR using 3D scanned objects that runs on everything better than a potato, but it also has some drawbacks as far as I know. If it's prerendered you can't have a lot of interactivity. For that you'd have to move to real time VR, which has many drawbacks like having to use powerful computers and high development costs for modeling and animating. It's a trade off but there's room for both.
It's still a relatively new technology and there's plenty room for development. It's still a lot of stuff that needs to be done in order to make VR accessible for end consumers and MarkSpace is doing a great job.
I think Mark.Space will be a leader in this technology, that started early so they are/will be ahead of their competitors in the market and with their vision more and more people can use VR technology.
So, now price $0,0833 and fixed in usd? This is a good decision to fix price in usd. Less risk for investors and devs as well.
ya better than fix follow eth or bitcoin price. see many project last year fix price follow eth. and they say they get x2 x3 and forget eth x5 already Jump to: