I admire the project, I think this is the best project at the moment
Actually, therefore, here such activity manifests itself
Topic: [ANN][ICO] MARK.SPACE - 3D/VR ecosystem on blockchain - page 79. (Read 162087 times)
I admire the project, I think this is the best project at the moment
Actually, therefore, here such activity manifests itselfI admire the project, I think this is the best project at the moment
Actually, therefore, here such activity manifests itselfI admire the project, I think this is the best project at the moment
Actually, therefore, here such activity manifests itself
I admire the project, I think this is the best project at the moment
Guys, i think this is far from second life. In fact there should be more projects trying to recreate second life in a virtual space. I do see how this platform could end up having a second life feel to it though. That all depends on the community and how we choose to use it.
On certain aspects what is already in the market that goes already close to this projext is seconth life.
But Second Life isnt designed as trade/commercial platform. Its an MMO with aspects of that and its more game then platform.
Second Life is more than trade / commercial people earns more than real life jobs. They buy virtual items and clothings you can wear. I don't see markspace more than point and click advanrture game with shop system
the point of having 3D residence and converse with people there if I can use skype sounds really cool, i am curious. 
The points before wasn't that you should be able to use both at the same time but a question why Mark.Space is needed with residences if you could instead use Skype to talk with other people.
There are already some games that let you chat online with tons of people in a 3d environment, but those are mostly for fun, mark.space goes beyond to the point of a literal space for you and/or your shop market, so using chat with skype or other method is a necessity here.
plus you can recreate and sell you residence in mark.space. people can see it without leaving their home
thats great idea, its double profit i think
On certain aspects what is already in the market that goes already close to this projext is seconth life.
But Second Life isnt designed as trade/commercial platform. Its an MMO with aspects of that and its more game then platform.
On certain aspects what is already in the market that goes already close to this projext is seconth life.
the point of having 3D residence and converse with people there if I can use skype sounds really cool, i am curious.
The points before wasn't that you should be able to use both at the same time but a question why Mark.Space is needed with residences if you could instead use Skype to talk with other people.
There are already some games that let you chat online with tons of people in a 3d environment, but those are mostly for fun, mark.space goes beyond to the point of a literal space for you and/or your shop market, so using chat with skype or other method is a necessity here.
plus you can recreate and sell you residence in mark.space. people can see it without leaving their home
the point of having 3D residence and converse with people there if I can use skype sounds really cool, i am curious.
The points before wasn't that you should be able to use both at the same time but a question why Mark.Space is needed with residences if you could instead use Skype to talk with other people.
There are already some games that let you chat online with tons of people in a 3d environment, but those are mostly for fun, mark.space goes beyond to the point of a literal space for you and/or your shop market, so using chat with skype or other method is a necessity here.
the point of having 3D residence and converse with people there if I can use skype sounds really cool, i am curious.
The points before wasn't that you should be able to use both at the same time but a question why Mark.Space is needed with residences if you could instead use Skype to talk with other people.
If you haven't tried it yet:
Go to demo (https://demo.mark.space/#_ga=2.264927439.1197085472.1515568213-1823790485.1512661034)
Go near the Rover showroom
Click on the orange rover parked outside (dont forget to keep speaker on)
Go to demo (https://demo.mark.space/#_ga=2.264927439.1197085472.1515568213-1823790485.1512661034)
Go near the Rover showroom
Click on the orange rover parked outside (dont forget to keep speaker on)
Your link was not working for me. There was a request for a login.
Thisone worked: https://demo.mark.space/
Than use map to jump to the car.
Cool feature with the motor sound and awesome Jaguar next to the rover.
But still to move with the mouse is not good.
Looking forward to jump into Mar.Space word with VR glases.
It certainly looks promising
the point of having 3D residence and converse with people there if I can use skype sounds really cool, i am curious.
- I don't who know did the analysis here but it differs slightly with ICO bench a week ago. One of the experts listed these points:
- Does not clearly define the problem they're solving. Is it that people don't have time? Is it online 3D retail made available? What's the point of having 3D residence and converse with people there if I can use SKYPE?
- Explanatory video hardly explains anything.
- 3D retail not gonna work for all industries. Especially upper class clothing and luxury brands: people have an experience shopping, try things out before buying, sometimes it is a status thing. 3VR at current stage of development and accesibility is not going to change that yet.
- Team has no advisors.
- Team member links to FB pages and/or wikipedia for the ICE hockey guy. Should it be an inspiration of confidence? How does ICE hockey skills relate to VR and this project?
My question is, has any of this changed for MarkSpace to score a 4.1 now? I am not trying to be the bogeyman but since we are all invested in this exciting project, we ought to know.
And i dont really get it, but if youre looking for the composition, you can check it here : https://icobench.com/ico/mark-space/ratings#ratings
He was among the only few experts who took care to list down his points for the rating. And therefore, that rating will have more weightage in people's mind. I would appreciate if the devs clarify or come up with some rebuttals.
Just to look at ICOs' name and that's it, it's so dumb to invest in a ICO by looking at those ratings where usually one person and a bot vote lol
I think so. But the ratings on these top sites greatly affect the fees for the ICO. Many projects get 4-5 points. Although most number of that projects do not deserve 3 points.Very nice rate for mark.space on icomarks, it come to the end of the ico but it’s still nice and the informations is still good to have. Im impatient to see the future of the project.
Since often to the end of an ICO a big amount of money is collected yet, it is great to see such a rating, especialy in the end.And it comes together with a phase, where the market seems to recover.
I would always advise not to trust blindly in rating sites. just do your own research.
Sure, no one should blindly trust these websites, but they are still a nice source to learn about new upcoming ICOs.
You've scored very well, Most rating sites have a profit from the projects. Research must always be done. maybe a project has a high rating at the beginning and after it may not work, or if it does not get its money for promotion it can give it a rather small rating only to cause problems.
It is best to invest in what you think is working or might work; in what you like or are interested in. Indeed, you can have the good fortune money just by investing blindly in a project without knowing it, based only on ratings. but not always ratings are real.
Especially since today the projects on blockchain or multiplied and the competition is very high.
MARK.SPACE is a future project from my point of view.
VR is becoming more and more popular and I think it will have a great success
I think that site for ico rating is not that bad, that give some advices and some key features about the ico, and you can compare rates. It’s something that investors have the habits to look. That give visibility to projects, and its a pretty good thing for the sucess of a project like MARK.SPACE.
This is not quite true. There are certainly sites that give true estimates, but mostly these sites are paid and free of charge no one is ready to give good ratings Just to look at ICOs' name and that's it, it's so dumb to invest in a ICO by looking at those ratings where usually one person and a bot vote lol
I think so. But the ratings on these top sites greatly affect the fees for the ICO. Many projects get 4-5 points. Although most number of that projects do not deserve 3 points.Jump to: