[ANN][ICO]⚡ Metahash - cryptocurrency for decentralized apps⚡ - page 66.

uberua

member

Activity: 179

Merit: 10

Quote from: MetaHash on June 25, 2018, 03:12:54 AM

Quote from: uberua on June 25, 2018, 01:49:16 AM

Curious how many nodes in total can there be is there a cap on let's say the core nodes?

Cap on cores is 256. But this pool is always reselected
Cap on total ammount of nodes is somewhere in thousends
Cap's and stakes are there to limit hardware costs to reasonable ammounts, but keeping a high decentrilization grade.

i see, and each node 1 node can handle more than 100,000 transactions per second is that torrent and slave nodes at 100,000

MetaHash

member

Activity: 1159

Merit: 19

Join the ride!

Quote from: uberua on June 25, 2018, 01:49:16 AM

Curious how many nodes in total can there be is there a cap on let's say the core nodes?

Cap on cores is 256. But this pool is always reselected
Cap on total ammount of nodes is somewhere in thousends
Cap's and stakes are there to limit hardware costs to reasonable ammounts, but keeping a high decentrilization grade.

MetaHash

member

Activity: 1159

Merit: 19

Join the ride!

Quote from: ?? on ??

You must to add token details to let participants to join the business!
Good luck!

sure, no problem. would you mind telling us what details we've missed?

uberua

member

Activity: 179

Merit: 10

Curious how many nodes in total can there be is there a cap on let's say the core nodes?

Limotine

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

Looking for something above amusing here! Pretty good website, thoughtful results! Good luck guys!

MetaHash

member

Activity: 1159

Merit: 19

Join the ride!

Quote from: DJCanh on June 25, 2018, 12:54:31 AM

any minimum amount of MHC to delegate?

No minimum.
The idea is you set up a node and ask people to trust you and delegate to you. Once you gain votes you take good care to protect your node.
If you re-delegate your coins from one fair node to another - you don ‘t loose trust
The system is meant that you never risk your coins but risk several month of rewards so you pick delegates carefully

DJCanh

member

Activity: 278

Merit: 10

any minimum amount of MHC to delegate?

MetaHash

member

Activity: 1159

Merit: 19

Join the ride!

Quote from: CryptoCause on June 25, 2018, 12:32:01 AM

Just read the white paper, how do we actually vote? Do we put our MHC at the certain node for certain period of time? We get additional MHC if our node gets rewards and lost our MHC if otherwise?

There will be an interface to delegate coins to a certain address of the node. Just like sending a tx, but without sending coins
If a node loses trust, delegation is canceled and you have to delegate again
So you don’t lose coins, but you do lose some rewards until your coins gain trust on another node
To gain 100% trust takes 6 months. So after 6 months, you start getting maximum possible rewards.

CryptoCause

newbie

Activity: 68

Merit: 0

Just read the white paper, how do we actually vote? Do we put our MHC at the certain node for certain period of time? We get additional MHC if our node gets rewards and lost our MHC if otherwise?

MetaHash

member

Activity: 1159

Merit: 19

Join the ride!

Quote from: ShiftyTripster on June 24, 2018, 10:41:17 PM

Quote from: MetaHash on June 24, 2018, 10:11:04 AM

Quote from: ShiftyTripster on June 24, 2018, 05:34:16 AM

Quote from: ShiftyTripster on June 24, 2018, 12:50:10 AM

Quote from: 247mining on June 23, 2018, 11:39:56 PM

We have an idea we want to discuss with you.

But the concept of two signatures has some disadvantages... For the fact that I can cancel a transaction looks good, but on the other side it looks risky too, especially for buying and selling purpose

Of course it will go a long way to prevent theft, but it has its own down side which may discourage others who may love your technology

So, practically you just lock some of your coins and you'll need some time to unlock them
The idea is to be able to lock some of the coins you own in a separate wallet so you can sleep well knowing that the second password can lock them back if somebody gets the 1st one.

OK.. Got it... Not locking the entire funds right?

You create Wallet A and B on your device.
And you create Wallet C that can only transfer to Wallet A or B and needs 24h to make the transaction.
Wallet C has 2 passwords.
You store B and 1 C password offline.
And A and 1 C password online
If you send some coins to Wallet C - they get locked and can only be sent to A and B. So if you lose passwords of A and 1 password to C to hacker you can still move your funds to B
A lot of problems appear with Exchange wallets getting hacked etc
So we think of an Idea of a safe storage for some of the coins

ShiftyTripster

newbie

Activity: 93

Merit: 0

Quote from: MetaHash on June 24, 2018, 10:11:04 AM

Quote from: ShiftyTripster on June 24, 2018, 05:34:16 AM

Quote from: ShiftyTripster on June 24, 2018, 12:50:10 AM

Quote from: 247mining on June 23, 2018, 11:39:56 PM

We have an idea we want to discuss with you.

But the concept of two signatures has some disadvantages... For the fact that I can cancel a transaction looks good, but on the other side it looks risky too, especially for buying and selling purpose

Of course it will go a long way to prevent theft, but it has its own down side which may discourage others who may love your technology

So, practically you just lock some of your coins and you'll need some time to unlock them
The idea is to be able to lock some of the coins you own in a separate wallet so you can sleep well knowing that the second password can lock them back if somebody gets the 1st one.

OK.. Got it... Not locking the entire funds right?

researcher194

jr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 1

The list of MetaHash´s consultants and advisors is overwhelming - but, sorry, I find it rather "overstretched". It´s one of the most extensive I´ve ever seen in an ICO:

AdSniper, AdNow and Agranowsky IT are doubtlessly renowned marketing consulting companies, and the other advisors and consultants are also first class. I think there is needed much money for paying them. But in view of the massive oncoming marketing campaign I´ve no doubt in a successful ICO.

MetaHash

member

Activity: 1159

Merit: 19

Join the ride!

Quote from: researcher194 on June 24, 2018, 04:13:34 AM

TAKE CARE WITH THIS ICO!

VERY DUBIOUS!

As per Swiss Law the director of of a local company must be local resident. Founders listed on MetaHash website are also the founders of MetaHash AG and they used to work with Mr. Ganin on various projects in the swiss banking industry. Mr. Ganin has a long experience in banking and truly believes that crypto industry will be powerfully supported by private and institutional investments. Thus he accepted an offer to lead Metahash project in Switzerland and became the local director for Metahash AG, Zug. In the coming weeks the company will start to grow in staff and representation in Switzerland and will include several reputed local professionals from the crypto industry. Meanwhile Clos Belmont Finance is a 14 year old multi family office directed by the same person since 2009. Its main area of activity is external asset management and in this regard crypto industry is becoming one of investment focuses for a vast number of clients wishing to diversify their portfolios from pure vanilla banking products or private equity. There is no connection between ICO of bank4u and mr Kirill Ganin apart from the fact that he knows the UBO of the bank. He was no way connected to this ICO.

ShiftyTripster

newbie

Activity: 93

Merit: 0

Quote from: ShiftyTripster on June 24, 2018, 12:50:10 AM

Quote from: 247mining on June 23, 2018, 11:39:56 PM

We have an idea we want to discuss with you.

Please tell what you think.

Idea against theft of crypto assets.

Idea abstract example:
Smart contract or special wallet with a second signature that can cancel a transaction within a certain period specified by a data-transaction in the network.

Simple example.
An exchange creates a wallet where it keeps its assets.
It sets 24 hours to cancel any outgoing transaction by an additional password.
The second password is stored securely and is not needed until a successful hacker attack happens.

Negative:
- you have to wait for 24 hours (or whatever time is specified)
- if you lose the second password your assets could be blocked by an attacker, but you keep the password securely stored for emergency and don't have to use it online until it happens

Positive:
even if you lose both passwords hacker can't use the funds, it will be a cat and mouse game that will discourage stealing

There can be multiple variations.
The same password can make transactions and cancel.
MultiPasswords for cancelation are needed.
And other. It's cool.

The main disadvantage is that no TX is really committed until X hours passed. For daily traders, this might not be something positive.
This mitigates the impact of the hacked exchange risk.
The hacking best strategy, in this case, would be to retire small amounts trying to minimize the chance that the exchange realizes it.
Other systems use some kind of blacklist to make the hacked assets unusable, but that requires some degree of centralization.

But the concept of two signatures has some disadvantages... For the fact that I can cancel a transaction looks good, but on the other side it looks risky too, especially for buying and selling purpose

Of course it will go a long way to prevent theft, but it has its own down side which may discourage others who may love your technology

MetaHash

member

Activity: 1159

Merit: 19

Join the ride!

Quote from: uberua on June 23, 2018, 01:51:20 AM

How does a node become a #MetaApp node? It's assigned by #TraceAI ?
By the WP looks like it's a different role

Node migration is determined by TraceChain AI, and it is based on voting system
all nodes run the same software and vote which node gets which role based on its place in the map built automatically based on performance results

MetaHash

member

Activity: 1159

Merit: 19

Join the ride!

Quote from: JavierGr on June 24, 2018, 12:03:21 AM

I have tested all the points of your project and all is really very useful.

thanks for your support, I hope you've already tested our wallet too
we'd appreciate any question or feedback of yours

researcher194

jr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 1

TAKE CARE WITH THIS ICO!

It´s launched by MetaHash AG (= Corp.) in Zug/Switzerland founded on April 17,2018 by the Russian national Kirill Ganin. There is no management staff.
Ganin is the only business executive and solely authorized to sign. He is also the only business executive at Close Belmont Finance SA, Geneva/Switzerland, which - inter alia - launches and promotes ICOs, recently Bank4YOU ICO (with BFY ("BEEFY") token). This ICO has already finished at the end of March, but till now buyers didn´t receive their token, and there is no trade.

Here the promotion action on bitcointalk:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/clos-belmont-ico-1353906

Here the posts of this user: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/clos-belmont-ico-1353906;sa=showPosts

VERY DUBIOUS!

MetaHash

member

Activity: 1159

Merit: 19

Join the ride!

Quote from: ShiftyTripster on June 24, 2018, 12:50:10 AM

Quote from: 247mining on June 23, 2018, 11:39:56 PM

But the concept of two signatures has some disadvantages... For the fact that I can cancel a transaction looks good, but on the other side it looks risky too, especially for buying and selling purpose

Yes, so we thought to limit the possible receiving address to own wallet only.

ShiftyTripster

newbie

Activity: 93

Merit: 0

Quote from: 247mining on June 23, 2018, 11:39:56 PM

We have an idea we want to discuss with you.

Please tell what you think.

Idea against theft of crypto assets.

Idea abstract example:
Smart contract or special wallet with a second signature that can cancel a transaction within a certain period specified by a data-transaction in the network.

Simple example.
An exchange creates a wallet where it keeps its assets.
It sets 24 hours to cancel any outgoing transaction by an additional password.
The second password is stored securely and is not needed until a successful hacker attack happens.

Negative:
- you have to wait for 24 hours (or whatever time is specified)
- if you lose the second password your assets could be blocked by an attacker, but you keep the password securely stored for emergency and don't have to use it online until it happens

Positive:
even if you lose both passwords hacker can't use the funds, it will be a cat and mouse game that will discourage stealing

There can be multiple variations.
The same password can make transactions and cancel.
MultiPasswords for cancelation are needed.
And other. It's cool.

The main disadvantage is that no TX is really committed until X hours passed. For daily traders, this might not be something positive.
This mitigates the impact of the hacked exchange risk.
The hacking best strategy, in this case, would be to retire small amounts trying to minimize the chance that the exchange realizes it.
Other systems use some kind of blacklist to make the hacked assets unusable, but that requires some degree of centralization.

But the concept of two signatures has some disadvantages... For the fact that I can cancel a transaction looks good, but on the other side it looks risky too, especially for buying and selling purpose

JavierGr

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

I have tested all the points of your project and all is really very useful.

Topic: [ANN][ICO]⚡ Metahash - cryptocurrency for decentralized apps⚡ - page 66. (Read 63668 times)