I wonder if you can verify the users identity in the network?
We are planning to implement already existing scientific identity provider like orcID
Great, so it's compatible with the existing systems and repositories?
Topic: [ANN][ITO] Scienceroot - The first Blockchain-based Scientific Ecosystem - page 11. (Read 6747 times)
July 28, 2018, 02:35:15 PM
We are planning to implement already existing scientific identity provider like orcID
Great, so it's compatible with the existing systems and repositories?
July 28, 2018, 01:59:22 PM
The universities and the labs will love to join!
July 28, 2018, 01:12:13 PM
We might have had hydrogen fuel by now if the researhers had an opportunity to use crowdfunding for that!
July 28, 2018, 01:03:01 PM
I wonder if you can verify the users identity in the network?
We are planning to implement already existing scientific identity provider like orcID
Great, so it's compatible with the existing systems and repositories?
July 28, 2018, 12:32:35 PM
Since 2014 there is already Einsteinium (EMC2) which is a coin designed to reward science and education. EMC2 is a PoW coin without any premine and already totally decentralized, with a good capitalization, good volumes and an excellent team with an exciting roadmap. So which is the need to create now something similar, and to sell it in an ICO? Just explain it to me 
The ideas are totally different, Einsteinium is trying to help scientific funding with PoW. How many scientific projects have been funded since 2014 with the help of Einsteinium?
Scienceroot aims to revolutionize knowledge creation and the overall scientific community with the help of blockchain, the areas tackled are collaboration, funding and publishing.
So this is more than just the use of blockchain as a currency, but storing scientific content on blockchain to solve problems like intellectual property theft.
If you still have doubts please check out our Website: https://scienceroot.com or Telegram: https://t.me/scienceroot
These ideas where the network's coin should only serve as a currency to fund certain things don't work. You have to tie the currency into an ecosystem that represents a compelling use case. That way the coin has a tangible reason to exist.
Correct! That's actually the main difference between emc2 and scienceroot
Yes but he is not the only one trying this. There are many coins that have no use case except for the dev claiming there is a use case... They make a coin and say please use this for buying nutrition...
July 28, 2018, 12:16:26 PM
Really amazing, I know that many promising developments aren't funded only because it's unprofitable for the current billioneers. Like, garbage isn't used as an energy resourse while oil is available.
July 28, 2018, 11:37:49 AM
Can they use the system for patents as well?
Yes. They can create the proof of Existence for anything related. It still has to be acknowledged in the end by the legal authority in charge with recognising patents 
July 28, 2018, 11:28:45 AM
Can they use the system for patents as well?
July 28, 2018, 11:26:49 AM
Do you plan any other apps soon? And how about the mobile versions?
In the future we plan to release it also as a mobile version, currently we are focusing only on the Web Version
Will be looking for this!
July 28, 2018, 11:22:30 AM
I wonder if you can verify the users identity in the network?
Can you use KYC for that?
July 28, 2018, 11:21:15 AM
how you will make the unique identities in the system?
It's easy when you link a certain ID to a wallet for example July 28, 2018, 11:11:29 AM
I wonder if you can verify the users identity in the network?
Can you use KYC for that?
July 28, 2018, 11:03:16 AM
how you will make the unique identities in the system?
We plan to partner with already existing identity providers and store the information on the blockchain
July 28, 2018, 10:28:49 AM
how you will make the unique identities in the system?
July 28, 2018, 10:18:57 AM
Your publishing platform is very unique, especially when it comes to failed hypothesis
Yes, nobody does it and that's one of the major drawbacks in science and academia. So many people/research groups pursue the same approach and fail at it, yet nobody makes this information public. It would be to the benefit of those who support science and scientists to have negative results/failed hypotheses publishedHow will you make a decision on whether to publish the results at all?
Before publishing the paper will go through a peer review which checks if the hypotheses are valid or not.
And it the end the Editor of the journal will have the last word if an article is published or not.
July 28, 2018, 10:17:40 AM
What's the most important feature that you'll focus on?
We are currently focusing on the Collaboration Platform next we will move into Funding and afterwards Publishing
July 28, 2018, 10:16:39 AM
How will you attract investors and funds to the platform?
Funding agencies are always looking for ways to market their grants.
July 28, 2018, 09:47:42 AM
You have several token generation event in the roadmap, it's the ICO stages?
The TGE event is split in four rounds over two years in order to create trust in the community, and develop a high quality platform. After the last round of funding, this will be a total boomer! July 28, 2018, 09:45:57 AM
How will you attract investors and funds to the platform?
By offering unprecedented services to the scientific community, from which they will all benefit, investors and users. July 28, 2018, 09:44:56 AM
You have several token generation event in the roadmap, it's the ICO stages?
Jump to: