Topic: [ANN][LXC][LIBREXCOIN]STAKING MOBILE WALLETS|MULTIPOOL|100% POS|BLOCKNET| - page 158. (Read 413974 times)
August 27, 2014, 05:00:55 PM
Mintpal, Bter, and BTC39 would add a huge amount of buyers to Librex. We need to try to get listed on these exchanges.
August 27, 2014, 04:57:43 PM
11 000
far from over... not even on mintpal yet.
A mintpal add would make this skyrocket.
August 27, 2014, 04:51:20 PM
11 000
far from over... not even on mintpal yet.
August 27, 2014, 04:47:42 PM
11 000
August 27, 2014, 04:41:29 PM
The side chain they are proposing will take care of the anon transactions AS WELL AS provide fault tolearnace and performance support for the main chain. It is like the white paper says - RAID 5 for Block Chain. !!!! INNOVATION!
RAID 5
RAID 5 comprises block-level striping with distributed parity. It requires that all drives but one be present to operate. Upon failure of a single drive, subsequent reads can be calculated from the distributed parity such that no data is lost.
RAID 5
RAID 5 comprises block-level striping with distributed parity. It requires that all drives but one be present to operate. Upon failure of a single drive, subsequent reads can be calculated from the distributed parity such that no data is lost.
Our Dev working on this will write up some information on side chains called "Advanced Side Chain, and how it will facilitate the performance and stability / reliability of the LibrexCoin chain" so that people may understand it better and how it applies to LibrexSend and LibrexCoin in general. This will be posted some time tomorrow. It will be a good read for those that are interested in that aspect of this development.
That should be very interesting. I have been reading up on sidechains...good stuff.
August 27, 2014, 04:20:16 PM
The side chain they are proposing will take care of the anon transactions AS WELL AS provide fault tolearnace and performance support for the main chain. It is like the white paper says - RAID 5 for Block Chain. !!!! INNOVATION!
RAID 5
RAID 5 comprises block-level striping with distributed parity. It requires that all drives but one be present to operate. Upon failure of a single drive, subsequent reads can be calculated from the distributed parity such that no data is lost.
RAID 5
RAID 5 comprises block-level striping with distributed parity. It requires that all drives but one be present to operate. Upon failure of a single drive, subsequent reads can be calculated from the distributed parity such that no data is lost.
Our Dev working on this will write up some information on side chains called "Advanced Side Chain, and how it will facilitate the performance and stability / reliability of the LibrexCoin chain" so that people may understand it better and how it applies to LibrexSend and LibrexCoin in general. This will be posted some time tomorrow. It will be a good read for those that are interested in that aspect of this development.
August 27, 2014, 04:12:27 PM
The side chain they are proposing will take care of the anon transactions AS WELL AS provide fault tolearnace and performance support for the main chain. It is like the white paper says - RAID 5 for Block Chain. !!!! INNOVATION!
RAID 5
RAID 5 comprises block-level striping with distributed parity. It requires that all drives but one be present to operate. Upon failure of a single drive, subsequent reads can be calculated from the distributed parity such that no data is lost.
RAID 5
RAID 5 comprises block-level striping with distributed parity. It requires that all drives but one be present to operate. Upon failure of a single drive, subsequent reads can be calculated from the distributed parity such that no data is lost.
August 27, 2014, 04:01:30 PM
+100000 For sidechains
August 27, 2014, 03:59:03 PM
Is Zerocoin implement it or not yet?
Not yet. But TBH, I;m more focused on the off chain transactions. That is truly amazing.
+1
This could be even better than Zerocoin.
+1000
I also consider Librexsend (SIDE CHAINS) 100 times better technology anonymous transactions than Zerocoin .
The anonymity of other coins is very archaic and ugly compared to this new technology that will be implemented here, LibrexSend will revolutionize the systems for anonymous transactions.
Yes it totally eliminates blockchain bloat on the main chain. this is the future.
August 27, 2014, 03:57:04 PM
I believe Bittrex had something to do with it.
I was never asked to authorize the withdraws or nothing! Even tho I was still logged in and everything!! My email was never changed.. Only 2FA was enabled? I smell something fishy!!
I was never asked to authorize the withdraws or nothing! Even tho I was still logged in and everything!! My email was never changed.. Only 2FA was enabled? I smell something fishy!!
You didn`t need to authorize a withdrawal with FA2?
No, I told Bittrex that is the most retarded thing I have heard. In cases like these It should always be authorized.. That hacker is going on a rampage hacking away tho.. His blockchain is filling up with coins like no other!
I don`t understand it. You needed the FA2 to login, right?
And if you make a withdrawal... there is no "Authorizing-Step"?
By me:
Login with 2FA
Withdrawal with 2FA
The Question is: Did the Hacker need to hack your Phone/2FA or not?
It all happened while I was logged into Bittrex. Not sure how they managed to do that without kicking me out.. I mean if a hacker hacks anything a IP trail follows. If an IP doesn't match the IP I am on it should boot me or the other person off. Mintpal once sent me a email with a warning about someone with a different IP was trying to log into my account.. I handled the situation before it escalated. Bittrex on the other hand doesn't do that. Why? I don't know. Something smells fishy with Bittrex and I am going to find that loophole.
Okay.. you were in your Account. The Hacker was in it, too. And possibly he was not over his IP, but over yours. Maybe he had control about your PC. And all Bittrex could/would find than is your IP. Just speculation...
But, what I still don`t understand is: Why is there no need for 2FA? Maybe the Hacker disabled it for the Withdrawal, but to do that he would need it also - I think. That point, with the 2FA, is incomprehensible for me.
Do you have asked Bittrex? And if yes, any answer?
August 27, 2014, 03:53:27 PM
I believe Bittrex had something to do with it.
I was never asked to authorize the withdraws or nothing! Even tho I was still logged in and everything!! My email was never changed.. Only 2FA was enabled? I smell something fishy!!
I was never asked to authorize the withdraws or nothing! Even tho I was still logged in and everything!! My email was never changed.. Only 2FA was enabled? I smell something fishy!!
You didn`t need to authorize a withdrawal with FA2?
No, I told Bittrex that is the most retarded thing I have heard. In cases like these It should always be authorized.. That hacker is going on a rampage hacking away tho.. His blockchain is filling up with coins like no other!
I don`t understand it. You needed the FA2 to login, right?
And if you make a withdrawal... there is no "Authorizing-Step"?
By me:
Login with 2FA
Withdrawal with 2FA
The Question is: Did the Hacker need to hack your Phone/2FA or not?
It all happened while I was logged into Bittrex. Not sure how they managed to do that without kicking me out.. I mean if a hacker hacks anything a IP trail follows. If an IP doesn't match the IP I am on it should boot me or the other person off. Mintpal once sent me a email with a warning about someone with a different IP was trying to log into my account.. I handled the situation before it escalated. Bittrex on the other hand doesn't do that. Why? I don't know. Something smells fishy with Bittrex and I am going to find that loophole.
No offence man, but this has nothing to do with librex. Could you find a bittrex or 2fa thread and post that stuff in there? Its possible that you stored your 2fa seed somewhere and got a virus and they snatched it up. Either way you're kindof flooding the wrong thread with your situation. I feel bad for you, but its just not appropriate here.
August 27, 2014, 03:48:55 PM
I believe Bittrex had something to do with it.
I was never asked to authorize the withdraws or nothing! Even tho I was still logged in and everything!! My email was never changed.. Only 2FA was enabled? I smell something fishy!!
I was never asked to authorize the withdraws or nothing! Even tho I was still logged in and everything!! My email was never changed.. Only 2FA was enabled? I smell something fishy!!
You didn`t need to authorize a withdrawal with FA2?
No, I told Bittrex that is the most retarded thing I have heard. In cases like these It should always be authorized.. That hacker is going on a rampage hacking away tho.. His blockchain is filling up with coins like no other!
I don`t understand it. You needed the FA2 to login, right?
And if you make a withdrawal... there is no "Authorizing-Step"?
By me:
Login with 2FA
Withdrawal with 2FA
The Question is: Did the Hacker need to hack your Phone/2FA or not?
It all happened while I was logged into Bittrex. Not sure how they managed to do that without kicking me out.. I mean if a hacker hacks anything a IP trail follows. If an IP doesn't match the IP I am on it should boot me or the other person off. Mintpal once sent me a email with a warning about someone with a different IP was trying to log into my account.. I handled the situation before it escalated. Bittrex on the other hand doesn't do that. Why? I don't know. Something smells fishy with Bittrex and I am going to find that loophole.
August 27, 2014, 03:44:17 PM
Is Zerocoin implement it or not yet?
Not yet. But TBH, I;m more focused on the off chain transactions. That is truly amazing.
+1
This could be even better than Zerocoin.
+1000
I also consider Librexsend (SIDE CHAINS) 100 times better technology anonymous transactions than Zerocoin .
The anonymity of other coins is very archaic and ugly compared to this new technology that will be implemented here, LibrexSend will revolutionize the systems for anonymous transactions.
+1111. The Dev seems to be a real professional who always reaches stated objectives and when he reaches them all then LXC will surpass Darkcoin, Bitcoindark and many others.
P.S. Changed my mind to sell @20 000 sats. 75-100K seems more realistic
August 27, 2014, 03:42:12 PM
10K
Next stop 25
Next stop 25
August 27, 2014, 03:40:35 PM
I believe Bittrex had something to do with it.
I was never asked to authorize the withdraws or nothing! Even tho I was still logged in and everything!! My email was never changed.. Only 2FA was enabled? I smell something fishy!!
I was never asked to authorize the withdraws or nothing! Even tho I was still logged in and everything!! My email was never changed.. Only 2FA was enabled? I smell something fishy!!
You didn`t need to authorize a withdrawal with FA2?
No, I told Bittrex that is the most retarded thing I have heard. In cases like these It should always be authorized.. That hacker is going on a rampage hacking away tho.. His blockchain is filling up with coins like no other!
I don`t understand it. You needed the FA2 to login, right?
And if you make a withdrawal... there is no "Authorizing-Step"?
By me:
Login with 2FA
Withdrawal with 2FA
The Question is: Did the Hacker need to hack your Phone/2FA or not?
August 27, 2014, 03:39:31 PM
Is Zerocoin implement it or not yet?
Not yet. But TBH, I;m more focused on the off chain transactions. That is truly amazing.
When do you think it will done?
Soon.. Maybe a week or a few weeks or a month.. Cant take too long!
Hum ok
I hope you are not the same dev like Crypt and his promising anon who never comes since 2 months
Nope see my POD. Not from crypt.
August 27, 2014, 03:38:37 PM
I had to translate it into the language romania
check here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=759100.new#new
my address LXC : DCMkoSjXff8YH5vGB8kzh1WGU3UtWD3gHS
thanks before
check here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=759100.new#new
my address LXC : DCMkoSjXff8YH5vGB8kzh1WGU3UtWD3gHS
thanks before
August 27, 2014, 03:37:40 PM
Who is putting in those 10,20,30,40 LXC orders? Whats the point? What are you trying to do? Please, stop being a kid!
Its trader binary, also known as "whale whispering"
Whats the point of that, keep the price low? Hold for some reason?
Makes it harder to read the mrkt.
And pisses you off? lol
shouldnt piss you off, it happens for a reason. I heard translation was lost of these great whisperers many years ago.
Either way, some more people should jump in IRC
August 27, 2014, 03:37:04 PM
I believe Bittrex had something to do with it.
I was never asked to authorize the withdraws or nothing! Even tho I was still logged in and everything!! My email was never changed.. Only 2FA was enabled? I smell something fishy!!
I was never asked to authorize the withdraws or nothing! Even tho I was still logged in and everything!! My email was never changed.. Only 2FA was enabled? I smell something fishy!!
You didn`t need to authorize a withdrawal with FA2?
No, I told Bittrex that is the most retarded thing I have heard. In cases like these It should always be authorized.. That hacker is going on a rampage hacking away tho.. His blockchain is filling up with coins like no other!
August 27, 2014, 03:36:13 PM
Is Zerocoin implement it or not yet?
Not yet. But TBH, I;m more focused on the off chain transactions. That is truly amazing.
When do you think it will done?
Soon.. Maybe a week or a few weeks or a month.. Cant take too long!
Hum ok
I hope you are not the same dev like Crypt and his promising anon who never comes since 2 months
dude dont ever compare them!!!!
Jump to: