I think that saying that it is dishonest behavior is a mistake and it shows how much people are here to make quick money and do not realize the technologies that are being made in these years... these will be the basis for the future and for what will come to our children.
As in all new challenges, even the one that the Nimiq team is trying to create, I imagine that presents new problems to be solved, they are not following a manual for the release of OASIS and the new algorithm but they are writing it... if you believe in the project take advantage of these prices to rack up more coins, grab a beer and enjoy the moment.
[/quote]
You are contradicting yourself. First you say that this is good technology, then you say that I have to believe in the project. If it’s good technology, it’s not a matter of faith;
it’s a matter of good technology as a fact, not just faith. The fact that the team is messing around is a fact. If the coin was needed by people, it would not be sold at a cheap price,
but accumulated and waited for the price to rise. There is no reason for a coin to fall in price by more than 3 times in less than 50 days. This only means that robots are trading
on the exchange or that the coin is of no value if someone drains it in such an amount that the price drops so much and quickly. Serious projects do not have such strong drawdowns.
The project team can easily keep the price of the coin at a stable growth level, but they don't care. It is possible that they are interested in this process. They do not have a director
who can fire someone for absenteeism or for violating the deadlines for the execution of some block of work. They feel like in paradise and enjoy the sweet life there.
If programmers fail and miss deadlines or mess around, then they should be fired and others should be hired. Now the situation is such that they simply steal time from those
who bought their coins or from those who expect from them some results of the mass introduction of their product. Also note that the coin has not been listed on any major exchange
since 2017. Yes, I know that the project is planning to switch to PoS, but this is not the reason that the coin is not traded on different exchanges. ETHEREUM (ETH) has also been
wanting to switch to PoS for a very long time, so what? Should they also refuse to list on other exchanges for the same reason? This is absurd, especially considering the fact that
the Nimiq team is very wealthy and has enough money to pay to list the coin on major exchanges. Read their financial report:
https://nimiq.com/blog/transparency-report-2020/In 2021, their assets have risen significantly, and to this day there are no new listings or project development. They have been drinking the blood of investors and coin buyers
since 2017 and continue to drink it to this day. They remind me of the GRAFT.NETWORK project team who also worked for a very long time on a complex and important project
and as a result left the project and ran away. Read it and you will understand that they did the same job, but did not cope with the task and fled in different directions.
They also fooled people's heads for many years and even reported every week about plans and pass work process. After every week team makes a new plans and this history repeats.
Read their website and whitepaper and you will find many of the same principles and ideas. I think that Nimiq is the same project as GRAFT.NETWORK and that
the Nimiq team members will soon scatter in different directions too. Therefore, one must look at history and facts. Therefore, until the situation changes, this opinion will hang here.