Me and my rig are feeling very small right now. I'm going to bed.
Topic: [ANN][NYAN] NyanCoin - ★★★V1.2 Released! Now Listed on Cryptsy! ★★★ - page 46. (Read 80984 times)
February 26, 2014, 03:51:57 AM
If I'm right, and those four blocks in a row were missed by the one guy just because of a glitch, then he must have 20 times the combined hash rate of everyone else!
Me and my rig are feeling very small right now. I'm going to bed.
Me and my rig are feeling very small right now. I'm going to bed.
February 26, 2014, 03:32:36 AM
But at this rate, he / they / it is going to kick us back up into the high diff, won't it / he / they?
He didn't get 66677 -66680. That's half of the ones he missed right there.
@atheistftwins: Your pool got those. Grats! He didn't get 66677 -66680. That's half of the ones he missed right there.
February 26, 2014, 03:32:12 AM
hope the hash sticks around for a bit, its going to power us through these blocks but then once diff skyrockets again, if it bails then we are back to square one again lol
I can't imagine anyone doing this then leaving...NYAN is currently far from the most profitable to mine at diff 9 right now, the only motivation that anyone would realistically have for doing this is to get us to 67000. Otherwise, they're just blowing money for no reason.
February 26, 2014, 03:29:31 AM
hope the hash sticks around for a bit, its going to power us through these blocks but then once diff skyrockets again, if it bails then we are back to square one again lol
February 26, 2014, 03:28:40 AM
But at this rate, he / they / it is going to kick us back up into the high diff, won't it / he / they?
BTW, of those eight blocks he missed, several of them were in a row, like he glitched out for a bit. He didn't get 66677 -66680. That's half of the ones he missed right there.
BTW, of those eight blocks he missed, several of them were in a row, like he glitched out for a bit. He didn't get 66677 -66680. That's half of the ones he missed right there.
February 26, 2014, 03:23:14 AM
February 26, 2014, 03:17:28 AM
But man, this guy would have to have like at least 500mh/s under his control to be able to do what he's doing, pretty crazy.
Wouldn't he need even more than that?From 66603 to 66690, these are his blocks:
66603 66604 66605 66606 66607 66608 66609 66610 66611 66612 66613 66614 66615 66616 66617 66618 66619 66620 66621 66622 66623 66624 66625 66626 66627 66628 66629 66630 66631 66632 66633 66634 66635 66636 66638 66639 66640 66641 66642 66643 66645 66646 66647 66648 66649 66650 66651 66652 66653 66654 66655 66656 66657 66658 66659 66660 66661 66662 66663 66664 66665 66666 66667 66669 66670 66671 66672 66673 66674 66675 66676 66681 66682 66683 66685 66686 66687 66688 66689 66690
In that entire run, he only missed eight blocks. He's getting 90% of all blocks. So his hashrate must be 10 times the combined hash rate of everyone else.
February 26, 2014, 03:10:52 AM
http://nyan.steadymining.com lets get Nyancoin to block 67000!
Stratum
Proportional Payouts
2%Fee
24/7 Uptime
Actively Monitored Server
Feel free to join us at:
http://nyan.steadymining.com
Stratum
Proportional Payouts
2%Fee
24/7 Uptime
Actively Monitored Server
Feel free to join us at:
http://nyan.steadymining.com
February 26, 2014, 03:10:19 AM
I just checked the blockchain.
Essentially all the new blocks are almost entirely going to this guy:
KRNboASVYKYMuH1ivzq5aqLWFfTebLwF3K
Is he a huge solo megahasher and the pools are misreporting the actual network hash? I hope so...
That would make sense.Essentially all the new blocks are almost entirely going to this guy:
KRNboASVYKYMuH1ivzq5aqLWFfTebLwF3K
Is he a huge solo megahasher and the pools are misreporting the actual network hash? I hope so...
BTW, I saw how your pool was practically taking every other block just before 66600, from looking on its website. That was a big difference.
It's also worth noting though that all of this guy's coins were moved to this account:
KDJ9B3MedQwdkbKUGnhTbBvq27duXBCv9i
Where it has been untouched. I don't think this is behavior multipools would have. But man, this guy would have to have like at least 500mh/s under his control to be able to do what he's doing, pretty crazy.
February 26, 2014, 03:00:49 AM
I just checked the blockchain.
Essentially all the new blocks are almost entirely going to this guy:
KRNboASVYKYMuH1ivzq5aqLWFfTebLwF3K
Is he a huge solo megahasher and the pools are misreporting the actual network hash? I hope so...
That would make sense.Essentially all the new blocks are almost entirely going to this guy:
KRNboASVYKYMuH1ivzq5aqLWFfTebLwF3K
Is he a huge solo megahasher and the pools are misreporting the actual network hash? I hope so...
BTW, I saw how your pool was practically taking every other block just before 66600, from looking on its website. That was a big difference.
February 26, 2014, 02:57:25 AM
I just checked the blockchain.
Essentially all the new blocks are almost entirely going to this guy:
KRNboASVYKYMuH1ivzq5aqLWFfTebLwF3K
Is he a huge solo megahasher and the pools are misreporting the actual network hash? I hope so...
Edit: Apparently this has also happened before around block 61000 where he just came in and blew through 800 blocks. Makes me think this might be some sort of multipool or a gigahasher
Essentially all the new blocks are almost entirely going to this guy:
KRNboASVYKYMuH1ivzq5aqLWFfTebLwF3K
Is he a huge solo megahasher and the pools are misreporting the actual network hash? I hope so...
Edit: Apparently this has also happened before around block 61000 where he just came in and blew through 800 blocks. Makes me think this might be some sort of multipool or a gigahasher
February 26, 2014, 02:56:55 AM
Now I'm seeing the net hashrate increase. The two pools I'm in haven't found anything since 66600, but they are so tiny that doesn't mean anything.
I'm on nyanmine, which supposedly has half the network hash, but only solved like 3 blocks since 66600...this is definitely incorrect. I just really want to know where the blocks are going...
I count 6 blocks...
February 26, 2014, 02:51:29 AM
Now I'm seeing the net hashrate increase. The two pools I'm in haven't found anything since 66600, but they are so tiny that doesn't mean anything.
I'm on nyanmine, which supposedly has half the network hash, but only solved like 3 blocks since 66600...this is definitely incorrect. I just really want to know where the blocks are going...
February 26, 2014, 02:47:20 AM
Do you believe in luck?
Do you believe in block 666 * 100?
Do you believe in block 666 * 100?
I believe we have a problem, either in the reporting of the difficulty or the reporting of the hash rate.
Worst case scenario is that the code completely got screwed up, which would be terrible.
I said that yesterday and blamed it (mistakenly) on KGW. Apparently its something else.
Best case would be that even if this is glitching out right now, it will only glitch out for 400 blocks, and KGW will kick in and save the day. Hopefully all is well.
*fingers crossed*
February 26, 2014, 02:47:05 AM
Now I'm seeing the net hashrate increase. The two pools I'm in haven't found anything since 66600, but they are so tiny that doesn't mean anything.
February 26, 2014, 02:45:56 AM
Do you believe in luck?
Do you believe in block 666 * 100?
Do you believe in block 666 * 100?
I believe we have a problem, either in the reporting of the difficulty or the reporting of the hash rate.
Worst case scenario is that the code completely got screwed up, which would be terrible.
I said that yesterday and blamed it (mistakenly) on KGW. Apparently its something else.
February 26, 2014, 02:44:23 AM
You're right. Sell so I can buy low in the morning 
Trust me you don't want me to sell, I am well past being a NYAN millionaire.
February 26, 2014, 02:43:56 AM
Well looks like we will be at 6700 in no time with these block times! lol
February 26, 2014, 02:42:45 AM
You're right. Sell so I can buy low in the morning
February 26, 2014, 02:39:20 AM
Do you believe in luck?
Do you believe in block 666 * 100?
Do you believe in block 666 * 100?
I believe we have a problem, either in the reporting of the difficulty or the reporting of the hash rate.
Worst case scenario is that the code completely got screwed up, which would be terrible.
Jump to: