Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][NYC] NEW YORK COIN at 2017 MACY'S THANKSGIVING DAY PARADE IN NYC! - page 68. (Read 141357 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 253
Simply do a Google search for ANY keywords NewYorkCoin related. "Community" has a nice website, but needs to improve their SEO skills. CK keeps NYC decentralized. And will never allow some johnny-come-lately's to control NYC's message. The "Community" pretends to support decentralization (just ask the owner of nycoinstores.com) but they wanted to control ALL info/marketing. Kind of like the American media-cabal. But that will NEVER EVER happen. "Community" controls development (at this particular moment in time) and CK controls the message/marketing. Just do a Google search and you will see this fact  Cool

Game-changer's for NYC:
1. Keeping a new network alive and healthy with much needed hashrate during it's infancy
2. Creating website/social with accurate, up-to-date info, coin stats and resources
3. Organizing IT pro's here to create mining pools and block explorer's before newbies could even grasp Bitcoin's future potential
4. Getting NYC listed on CoinMarketCap - making NYC real crypto FOREVER & EVER!  Grin
5. Getting NYC listed on Yobit, Exrates and BiteBTC (while "Community" focused on Frei, TradeSatoshi, Graviex and the rest of the $10/day volume exchanges)
6. Getting NYC integrated on COINOMI
7. Paying mooching free-loader's to bring on merchant acceptance in New York City and beyond
8. Opening THE NEW YORK COIN CENTER for further exposure in NYC's hometown
9. Remaining a permanent check to "Community" Centralization and ensuring the false prophets will NEVER be able to effectively skew the message of NYC (remember all the "Community" clown's insisting NYC was not really a free coin?)

What have YOU contributed to NYC? Other than amateur disinformation posts on a rarely read message board about it's pioneer and earliest miner/supporter. Answer: Nothing at all.
newbie
Activity: 641
Merit: 0
According to a new study, 25 million Americans are thinking about buying cryptocurrency in the next 12 month
The report reveals a raft of ownership insights and trends, as well as the future investment habits of cryptocurrency from the top four states: New York, California, Texas, and Florida, which make up 40% of all cryptocurrency holdings in the country.

https://dailyhodl.com/2019/08/17/25-million-americans-are-considering-investing-in-crypto-study/


in 12 months  more than 2 milion peaple from New York state
if 1 milion peaple invest $1000 in NYC = 1B

market cap became about  50 Bilions and one 1 NYC about $0.35
newbie
Activity: 641
Merit: 0
i dont undestand why all NYC team is heavy against CK

is like a war

newbie
Activity: 417
Merit: 0
CK make a lot for NYC


We Don't Need Leaders or Managers!


NYC team should not dictate to other members of the community

I think I saw you in telegram the other day, lol ck May have done some good for nyc in the past but that time is long gone and for all the foolishness he’s been carrying on with after the bull fun of 2017/2018 he only wants nyc to be a pump  and dump , so plz tell me what has ck done for nyc lately other then waste 5k for yobit to screw him yet again? I’ll await your response and please make it a good one!!!!
jr. member
Activity: 91
Merit: 8
CK make a lot for NYC


We Don't Need Leaders or Managers!


NYC team should not dictate to other members of the community

Nice job of contradicting yourself  Wink

Team CK is filled with Mensa candidates.
newbie
Activity: 641
Merit: 0
CK make a lot for NYC


We Don't Need Leaders or Managers!


NYC team should not dictate to other members of the community
jr. member
Activity: 91
Merit: 8

Or they understand this very well. And pretend to be trying to help NYC. While under my leadership, NYC price hit $0.0012 on MILLIONS of dollars of daily trading volume. Let's see what happens under "Community" leadership (other than a successful 51% attack).

You are holding this coin back, Charlie.  No developers want to invest their valuable time while you continue to perpetuate your con.  Your history is an unending stream of broken promises about merchant adoption and ATMs, your contributions have all been cynical shortcuts to garner you the quickest profits possible or self-aggrandizing efforts like your "Coin Center".  If you had poured those resources into building a team to provide the much needed advancement to the code and infrastructure instead of squandering the opportunities the last bull-run provided you with, that would have demonstrated leadership.  As it is, every developer that met you quickly recognized you for what you are - a con man.  Most simply walked away, a few joined the NYCoin Community and donated what time they could, but not nearly enough.

You are no leader.
newbie
Activity: 417
Merit: 0
Maybe SouthXchange can add another $14 to daily volume... Huh

graviex have more users than SouthXchange


SouthXchange  cost 0.5 btc to list


nyc team dont undestand withnot one exchanger like yobit we cant reach again last bull run prices



Or they understand this very well. And pretend to be trying to help NYC. While under my leadership, NYC price hit $0.0012 on MILLIONS of dollars of daily trading volume. Let's see what happens under "Community" leadership (other than a successful 51% attack).


Lmfaoooo stfu!!!! this guy ck is funnyyyyyy 😂😩 under your leadership? I guess you were the cause for the ending of 2017-2018 btc and alts bull runs huh? Lmao under your leadership gtfoh with this dumb ass post , under your leadership nyc was on a chain that was wide open to attack and it was , under your leadership yobit scam you and nyc over and over , under your leadership bitebtc scamed users out of the funds and locked them out of their accounts , under your leadership nyc was and would have only been nothing more than a pump and dump for YOU to make money you care nothing about making Nyc a true RETAIL coin ,lmao “under your leadership “ 😂🤣 you made my stomach hurt with that 1 it’s too early to be laughing this loud
newbie
Activity: 417
Merit: 0
Maybe SouthXchange can add another $14 to daily volume... Huh


Lmao and maybe yobit will give you back some of  your .5 btc for only opening the wallets for such a short time, yobit got u bro and ur still to stupid to see it 😩😅 , to those that got a teaser of gains by “someone” wash trading don’t worry bigger exchanges will come but security comes 1st!!! Those recent gains were to sucker in cattle’s for the slaughter 💭....
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 253
Maybe SouthXchange can add another $14 to daily volume... Huh

graviex have more users than SouthXchange


SouthXchange  cost 0.5 btc to list


nyc team dont undestand withnot one exchanger like yobit we cant reach again last bull run prices



Or they understand this very well. And pretend to be trying to help NYC. While under my leadership, NYC price hit $0.0012 on MILLIONS of dollars of daily trading volume. Let's see what happens under "Community" leadership (other than a successful 51% attack).
jr. member
Activity: 91
Merit: 8
Maybe SouthXchange can add another $14 to daily volume... Huh

graviex have more users than SouthXchange


SouthXchange  cost 0.5 btc to list


nyc team dont undestand withnot one exchanger like yobit we cant reach again last bull run prices


As the NYC community team clearly articulated, SouthXchange is necessary to act as a backup when Graviex goes into maintenance.  SouthXchange is supported by several of the larger multi-pools that provide hashrate necessary to secure the integrity of the blockchain and protect against 51% attacks in an era where anyone with a few hundred dollars can rent enough hashrate to wreak havoc with small hashrate coins.  It was hoped that bringing Yobit back online would also serve that purpose but the large pools don't like working with Yobit.  Yobit is unreliable and unresponsive and have screwed over too many coin dev teams with their shenanigans.

Additionally, and while I hate to be the bearer of bad news, research in this very thread has shown that 70% percent of the NYC on Yobit was recently controlled by a single person. During the run up, this number was likely 90% or more since that person was also the person responsible for bringing NYC to Yobit and has, over the years, been the greatest supporter of Yobit, despite all the drama Yobit has created for NYC.  When you control that much of the float on a single exchange, it is very easy to washtrade the price in any direction you want at very little cost.

So yes @Bigger By the Day, I think the NYC team does understand that NYC might not reach the highs of the last bull run without an exchange like Yobit supporting fake volume and wash trading that profits a very small number of people at the expense of the many.  The strongly held belief by many I've communicated with is that by working together as a community to support each other and the NYC blockchain through incremental improvements, the goal of a trustless, decentralized means of exchange and store of value will be achieved.
newbie
Activity: 641
Merit: 0
Maybe SouthXchange can add another $14 to daily volume... Huh

graviex have more users than SouthXchange


SouthXchange  cost 0.5 btc to list


nyc team dont undestand withnot one exchanger like yobit we cant reach again last bull run prices

sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 253
BAKKT HAS BEEN CLEARED FOR LAUNCH!

If you have NYC at Yobit - you'll be smiling from ear-to-ear when the impending BTC bull stampede hits!

Don't sell yourself short. A little more patience will be handsomely rewarded!!!
Shocked
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 253
Maybe SouthXchange can add another $14 to daily volume... Huh
newbie
Activity: 641
Merit: 0
we need yobit back . graviex is to small exchange at this moment
newbie
Activity: 641
Merit: 0
 any news about yobit ?

-  we need a big exchanger like yobit
i use yobit on my own risk - 


* use at own risk this shoud be NYC team  position on yobit
did you see NYC volume today ? again very low

newbie
Activity: 641
Merit: 0
hope yobit open again nyc wallets
newbie
Activity: 417
Merit: 0


☑ Vote For NYC! ☑

The time has come, and voting to win integration with CryptocurrencyCheckout.com is now live!!

To create an account and vote ⤵


And there’s also an active bounty in their discord for this so join nyc discord and claim your bounty
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 508
Bisq Market Day - March 20th 2023

Why you say can't and shouldn't be disputed. Still the question remains why a lot of coins claim to have low fees when there is literally no trading volume (no liquidity) at all. Transaction fees might be low, but you just can't use the coin to transfer funds as you can't get out of it anymore. That's why I think that there won't be tens of thousands of functional currencies in the future. It makes more sense for all of us to converge to a couple of them and thereby reduce all kinds of premiums, like the liquidity premium.

Consolidation down to a few coins is certainly a possibility. However, I think there is also the case to be made for a larger number of coins that, by supporting atomic swaps, be it through second-layer solutions like LN or via DEXs, provide increased resiliency against attack and centralization efforts by supporting multiple simultaneous network paths.  For POS coins, the energy requirements can be mitigated by having the majority of coins use AuxPOW.

The other interesting benefit to having multiple tokens/coins is that they can provide unique utility, DGB's password manager feature being an example.  Many purpose built chains that do one or two things well would be better than having a kitchen sink/jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none approach.  I do agree that tokens/coins that merely tweak rewards, block-timings, etc. will cease to have value.

Everything you said is right, promising or interesting. There's nothing to argue about at this point in time as we need to see what time brings about. My theory is just this: the amount of utility or different utilities/functions provided by different tokens is essentially unlimited while liquidity is pretty much limited. I think I do see what you mean by atomic swaps and maybe thereby shifting liquidity from one network to another based on supply and demand. Otherwise I would see a couple of tokens or coins rather absorb the functionalities of other networks, thereby preventing liquidity from having to spread out through an unlimited number networks. I guess that is what you suggest will be achievable by atomic swaps. But do you think it will play out like that? This seemingly frictionless hyper network consisting of all these smaller, specific functionality networks that are connected through atomic swap technology? It is an interesting thought, but it seems so far away.
newbie
Activity: 417
Merit: 0
I love how "Community" leadership warns everyone not to use Yobit - but obviously uses it themselves. Classic!


I love how you try to be the king of ny but fall so miserably every time , maybe this is a wake up call for some people to see following you is a waste of time and effort and also a very bad way to spend 5k reopening yobit for nyc when that money could have gone elsewhere, hmmmm!!! If only you could’ve played well with others 🤔 and stop trying to be “right” which you are never and I have a yobit account and got my nyc off of it and I still log in from time to time to check the status of nyc wallets even though I don’t use it so your statement is pointless
Pages:
Jump to: