http://k-dev.net/cgminer/I have absolutely no affiliation to this person, so if something happens as a result of using this, you're on your own
haha. But I found it on the middlecoin thread and have been using it the last week and it's basically eliminated any coin-switch disconnects for me and averages around 870Khs on my 290x and 310Khs on my 6870. Rejects are usually under 5% as well
I do hope this doesn't nuke my PC. It looks cleaner, seem to average about the same kh/s with my 290x (922) as regular cgminer, and the update timer rocks. 5 mins on middlecoin is too long.
Thanks!
BTW, site is showing 0 blocks for the last 7 rounds. I hope it jests.
what settings are you using to get 900+? And what brand?
Best I've gotten is 875Khs with a Sapphire 290x
Buddy, you are in luck. That's my brand.
Should I say though? lol.
Yes.
Make a cgminer.cfg file like this, with your pool info.
Set MSI Afterburner to +9 on power limit, your Core to 960, your memory to 1440. Set fan to 90 or 100, depending on your temperature limit and dust content.
{
"pools" : [
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum01.hashco.ws:8888",
"user" : "ThatOneGuy.1",
"pass" : "x"
},
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://middlecoin.com:3333",
"user" : "175juTRPfiAMxjLfGMtA7QDJPn3YLqPkt1",
"pass" : "x"
}
]
,
"intensity" : "20",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "512",
"kernel" : "scrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "32765",
"shaders" : "0",
"gpu-engine" : "0-0",
"gpu-fan" : "0-100",
"gpu-memclock" : "0",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "30",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000",
"temp-cutoff" : "90",
"temp-overheat" : "86",
"temp-target" : "83",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "120",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log" : "3",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"protocol-dump" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "30",
"scrypt" : true,
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}
You may get better results with a worksize of 256, lookup gap of 0, and/or a powertune of 0, I'm actively testing this right now over two to four days.
Also, too many people fail to see this, but one of the most ideal ratios for clock to memory is 1:1.5. I have found none better.