Topic: [ANN][SEED] SeedCoin | New Road Map - page 54. (Read 184134 times)

That wasn't an insult in any way. If you re-read your statement you will, I'm sure, find it pathetic. It is a statement of fact. I don't know if you are pathetic or not; your statement, definitely is.

As for seed being awesome, I do get the joke. I do.

+1

I think it's time to unignore barabbas. LOL

There is no need for that, I may have questioned your logic but I have never insulted you. Can we just keep on the topic of seed and how awesome it is.

So incredibly pathetic

Every time someone dumps seed coin a tree dies in the amazon.

so sad

Excuse me? Funny, funny indeed.

As for the price in Bittrex, I though everyone agreed already that is absolutely meaningless at this stage...

Of course, it is meaningless when it tilts like it does every minute, downside.... wow...

Once again, everyone in this POS deserves, fully deserves, what's coming to them.

As for me reading the ANN, you are a joker. And a joke. Exactly which part of copy/paste/hackjob don't you understand? Because this is not up for debate since the perpetrator was forced to admit the obvious -only after caught, mind you-.

Total waste.

Of course it is, that previous FUD just propels smart buyers to by moar!

Price is rising on bittrex

Have you actually read the ANN?? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annseed-seedcoin-new-road-map-795954   

Thanks for the info.  Missed the network tab on the blockchain website.

If he is indeed a strong pool operator than when me and another person asked about the block number we were on he would have just replied with our pool is on block # and that was a typo and we would have been done with it.  But instead he took it as a personal attack.  Which is ridiculous because we were just trying to confirm that there was not a fork.  Which does happens when coins get launched because everyone piles to the pool with the biggest hashrate.

With all due respect, you are 100% wrong, sorry.

The 99% of liars, con artists, fraudsters and scammers that are in crypto, as well as the batallion of greedy blind mofos, are the cancer of crypto and the reason no progress, or very minimal, is achieve, not those who point out the flaws of projects.

Case in point, this coin. Scam? Maybe not, not in the traditional way of take the money and run (mind you, there was no money to take so we can only speculate what would have happened where had been some...). I don't believe you will argue that there is no innovation here whatsoever, since it is a hack job copy/paste of Shadowcoin, will you? There was the absurd gimmick of the 269% growth period, a gimmick. No benefit for any one. Vapor sold to greedy mofos. What "good" does SEED bring to crypto, even if it would have been successful because instead of 7 greedy bastards there would have been 70. Or 700?

Crypto needs to eliminate the bad players. And this one is the perfect example. Projects like this have to be DOA, so other inept individuals are prevented for bringing the copy/paste BS to the market or be eradicated by the market. Instantly.

There are quite a few projects already -and more coming- well deserving of praise and investment in crypto. They also require scrutiny and debate for NOTHING is without any possibility of betterment. Those projects deserve the attention, the investment, the support ... and the debate, not idiotic propositions such as this.

Once again: Crypto needs to eliminate the bad players in order to accelerate its progress and reach some level of stability AND credibility. The restriction of freedom of speech that you propose, in any way, shape or form, is precisely the opposite of what crypto needs.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/seed/#!network

copy/paste the whole, including !network

Not taking a query seriously, and blowing off a query meant to misdirect the conversation from the point that you are trying to make, are 2 completely different things. 

I did not see his point addressed, merely a comment focused on a typo.

Hey, jack ass, not only there wasn't a single word or NUMBER not correct there, but STILL the proper number (if it is true that there are 5 more days of growth) is 2.28 million.

Never, ever, ever, a lie. EVER.

Fucking idiot.

This is the very same pool operator that did not take a query seriously early on in the mining phase trying to confirm that the coin had not forked.  Because we know that never happens.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9091144

If you're responding to my comments then you are still missing the point. My comments were not accusatory, I was merely doing what you are so vehemently advocating and that is pointing out a flaw. There is a flaw in the way some people are reporting problems and handling their concerns. If two people are at the counter at the airport both with a problem with their ticket, one is being courteous and composed while the other is cursing and throwing things like an infant, who do you think will be helped first?

Accusing a pool operator of spreading FUD about a coin he invested into and mined is his pool, is asinine.

Lifeforce is a very strong pool, and the pool op is very focused on making himself and the pool users profit from mining.  And he has been helpful with users that had wallet issues with seed, etc. (he's helpful to all pool users that have issues)

The point is, that seed has been a total mess since the staking began.  Some have exceptional responses, others have very poor, doing the exact same thing.  

Someone complaining about doing something properly and getting poor results, when someone else does the exact same thing and gets better results, isn't FUD, it's a legitimate gripe about flaws in the code that shouldn't exist.

 “Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.”

― Robert A. Heinlein