Good job
Topic: [ANN]Spectrecoin[XSPEC] TOR+OBFS4, Ring Sig, Stealth! - page 52. (Read 94882 times)
Wallet V1.3.5 on Win64 works fine for me.
Good job
Good job
Is there signature bounty campaign for Spectrecoin?
Where is the bounty thread?
Where is the bounty thread?
No bounty. Just volunteers at present
so...how's the roadmap doing? and the new site?
Is there signature bounty campaign for Spectrecoin?
Where is the bounty thread?
Where is the bounty thread?
Waiting for my Jr. membership to arrive so I can add the signature to my profile. 2018 Will be the year for spectrecoin. Stealth staking is just around the corner, no other coin can do this for the moment.
speaking of this, I asked but haven't received an answer. Why are signatures segregated on ranks? What's stopping me from picking the signature that I like?
speaking of this, I asked but haven't received an answer. Why are signatures segregated on ranks? What's stopping me from picking the signature that I like?
There's a bitcointalk limit to the number of characters that you can carry based on your rank. Higher tiers have more available characters for their signature.
That make sense!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27838802
sry, I guess I missed it. Probably scrolled too fast
Can anyboday share the Link to 1.3.4 for Max osx? I cannot find it on github
Binaries are not released yet; you can either compile it yourself, or wait for 1.3.5. The reason for the lack of an official binary release is a Qt4 issue on Windoze systems.
Can I say Holy Shit?
I wait for 4 months for v1.3.4. And now there is no binaries. Kidding me? I am a noob and compilation is hard to me.
v1.3.5? Another several months? OMG!
Waiting for my Jr. membership to arrive so I can add the signature to my profile. 2018 Will be the year for spectrecoin. Stealth staking is just around the corner, no other coin can do this for the moment.
speaking of this, I asked but haven't received an answer. Why are signatures segregated on ranks? What's stopping me from picking the signature that I like?
speaking of this, I asked but haven't received an answer. Why are signatures segregated on ranks? What's stopping me from picking the signature that I like?
There's a bitcointalk limit to the number of characters that you can carry based on your rank. Higher tiers have more available characters for their signature.
That make sense!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27838802
One of my favorite coins. Can't wait for the things to come! Good luck to the development and cheers to all who are contributing 
Can't wait for version 1.3.5. of the wallet users will be able to donate staking, that will provide resources to give Xspecs the boost they need. Then the bigger exchanges all want to trade Xspecs
You are absolutely right
Waiting for my Jr. membership to arrive so I can add the signature to my profile. 2018 Will be the year for spectrecoin. Stealth staking is just around the corner, no other coin can do this for the moment.
speaking of this, I asked but haven't received an answer. Why are signatures segregated on ranks? What's stopping me from picking the signature that I like?
speaking of this, I asked but haven't received an answer. Why are signatures segregated on ranks? What's stopping me from picking the signature that I like?
There's a bitcointalk limit to the number of characters that you can carry based on your rank. Higher tiers have more available characters for their signature.
That make sense!
Waiting for my Jr. membership to arrive so I can add the signature to my profile. 2018 Will be the year for spectrecoin. Stealth staking is just around the corner, no other coin can do this for the moment.
speaking of this, I asked but haven't received an answer. Why are signatures segregated on ranks? What's stopping me from picking the signature that I like?
speaking of this, I asked but haven't received an answer. Why are signatures segregated on ranks? What's stopping me from picking the signature that I like?
There's a bitcointalk limit to the number of characters that you can carry based on your rank. Higher tiers have more available characters for their signature.
xspec needs to go on a bigger exchange so ppl start tor ecognize it 
the devs don't want that. They want to keep it on small anonymous exchanges
I don't think it's the size that matters (at least in this case). It's the requirements around the exchanges listings. If Bittrex or any of the big exchanges would approach XSPEC to be listed because they are interested in listing a coin with immense potential, then this would certainly not be declined.
That said, I suppose that with with staking donations in place, and once the devs have received their fair share to continue their work, the decision of how to put any left-over money to use should be decided by the community. And if the community feels that it's more worthwhile to spend the money on getting listed on an exchange than, for instance, hiring more devs, or spending on marketing, then I'm sure the project would not resist.
But again, for that we need to have the money in the coffers, and the devs need to get reimbursed properly.
the world doesn't work like that. Exchanges don't approach you. You approach them and also pay them to list your coin. Cheapest exchange is Cryptopia where you need to pay around 100k dollars. The bigger ones are about twice as expensive. On top of that you need to guarantee some volume
As far the money goes, i don't know the current financial situation of the team and their budget.. Regarding to the volume (guarantee) no one can look into the future and "guarantee" something in the field op cryptocurrency. I'd go for the positive and see where it goes...
I think the bigger exchanges should allow (and possible they do) a reasonable timeframe to meet he minimm trading volume..
they look at the volume on your existing exchanges and if it doesn't meet their minimum, the discussion ends there
xspec needs to go on a bigger exchange so ppl start tor ecognize it
the devs don't want that. They want to keep it on small anonymous exchanges
I don't think it's the size that matters (at least in this case). It's the requirements around the exchanges listings. If Bittrex or any of the big exchanges would approach XSPEC to be listed because they are interested in listing a coin with immense potential, then this would certainly not be declined.
That said, I suppose that with with staking donations in place, and once the devs have received their fair share to continue their work, the decision of how to put any left-over money to use should be decided by the community. And if the community feels that it's more worthwhile to spend the money on getting listed on an exchange than, for instance, hiring more devs, or spending on marketing, then I'm sure the project would not resist.
But again, for that we need to have the money in the coffers, and the devs need to get reimbursed properly.
the world doesn't work like that. Exchanges don't approach you. You approach them and also pay them to list your coin. Cheapest exchange is Cryptopia where you need to pay around 100k dollars. The bigger ones are about twice as expensive. On top of that you need to guarantee some volume
As far the money goes, i don't know the current financial situation of the team and their budget.. Regarding to the volume (guarantee) no one can look into the future and "guarantee" something in the field op cryptocurrency. I'd go for the positive and see where it goes...
I think the bigger exchanges should allow (and possible they do) a reasonable timeframe to meet he minimm trading volume..
xspec needs to go on a bigger exchange so ppl start tor ecognize it
the devs don't want that. They want to keep it on small anonymous exchanges
I don't think it's the size that matters (at least in this case). It's the requirements around the exchanges listings. If Bittrex or any of the big exchanges would approach XSPEC to be listed because they are interested in listing a coin with immense potential, then this would certainly not be declined.
That said, I suppose that with with staking donations in place, and once the devs have received their fair share to continue their work, the decision of how to put any left-over money to use should be decided by the community. And if the community feels that it's more worthwhile to spend the money on getting listed on an exchange than, for instance, hiring more devs, or spending on marketing, then I'm sure the project would not resist.
But again, for that we need to have the money in the coffers, and the devs need to get reimbursed properly.
the world doesn't work like that. Exchanges don't approach you. You approach them and also pay them to list your coin. Cheapest exchange is Cryptopia where you need to pay around 100k dollars. The bigger ones are about twice as expensive. On top of that you need to guarantee some volume
Hey man.. you are the one linked a debunked "XSPEC = scam" topic that, if you read it, showed it being debunked, but you still asked "is it a scam".
That's pretty clear that you're trying to spread FUD.
Then you come up with some virus, and imply it could be open-source XSPEC... why not the probably HUNDREDS of other softwares you could have downloaded?
Did you go post virus alerts in all the other software/coin wallet forums that you used? Why XSPEC?
Spreading reasonable questions are OK, but it's pretty obvious you were just trying to FUD XSPEC while seeming innocent.
If you had $25000 of XSPEC instead of $25, you would be talking differently, I'm sure.
That's pretty clear that you're trying to spread FUD.
Then you come up with some virus, and imply it could be open-source XSPEC... why not the probably HUNDREDS of other softwares you could have downloaded?
Did you go post virus alerts in all the other software/coin wallet forums that you used? Why XSPEC?
Spreading reasonable questions are OK, but it's pretty obvious you were just trying to FUD XSPEC while seeming innocent.
If you had $25000 of XSPEC instead of $25, you would be talking differently, I'm sure.
That's the exact the point:
"If you had $25000 of XSPEC instead of $25, you would be talking differently, I'm sure."
He missed the train and hated himself and hated XSPEC.
Hey man.. you are the one linked a debunked "XSPEC = scam" topic that, if you read it, showed it being debunked, but you still asked "is it a scam".
That's pretty clear that you're trying to spread FUD.
Then you come up with some virus, and imply it could be open-source XSPEC... why not the probably HUNDREDS of other softwares you could have downloaded?
Did you go post virus alerts in all the other software/coin wallet forums that you used? Why XSPEC?
Spreading reasonable questions are OK, but it's pretty obvious you were just trying to FUD XSPEC while seeming innocent.
If you had $25000 of XSPEC instead of $25, you would be talking differently, I'm sure.
That's pretty clear that you're trying to spread FUD.
Then you come up with some virus, and imply it could be open-source XSPEC... why not the probably HUNDREDS of other softwares you could have downloaded?
Did you go post virus alerts in all the other software/coin wallet forums that you used? Why XSPEC?
Spreading reasonable questions are OK, but it's pretty obvious you were just trying to FUD XSPEC while seeming innocent.
If you had $25000 of XSPEC instead of $25, you would be talking differently, I'm sure.
lol are you trolling? The wallets are open-source. Why don't you go look on Github and check it for yourself?
You are (1) indirectly stating that XSPEC is a scam. Let's get that out of the way - a scam ICO does not go as well as XSPEC has, and for as long. A scam ICO is something like Fujinto or Confido.
It's difficult to FUD something that is legit like XSPEC.
You are (1) indirectly stating that XSPEC is a scam. Let's get that out of the way - a scam ICO does not go as well as XSPEC has, and for as long. A scam ICO is something like Fujinto or Confido.
It's difficult to FUD something that is legit like XSPEC.
Sorry, but I am not trolling. I am trying to get help. I'll go to Github, but I'm pretty sure I won't understand a thing there as usual (I'm somewhat clueless when it comes to programming and developing)
Any helpful comments please?
I'm not on Mac, so I can't help there. But rest assured, XSPEC is no scam. As it's PoS you definitely also don't get any overheating from running the wallet, like you would get from wallets that also have PoW mining. The problems you mention have nothing to do with SpectreCoin. Something else seems to be the trouble.
Thanks your reply! I'm glad to hear that and really hope it's good. XSPEC seems to have really great potential. Maybe it's just a coincidence that I ended up with this strange "moszcpu quit unexpectedly" and was never able to open the Spectre.app (Spectre quit unexpectedly error).
I have no reason to FUD, since I myself am a humble XSPEC holder, although I am still unable to start staking because of these errors I'm getting. It's the only wallet I have that won't open for me, so I figured I should do more research about the coin and maybe I can get some support on this thread.
Although I have already sent the error log to Apple a few times, I am thinking of sending it to the Spectre team. Would that be safe? Should I remove some info, like the Anonymous UUID or anything else?
Thanks
You can try the XSPEC support channel on Slack. But frankly, i don't think you will get anywhere with that, since the problem is not XSPEC itself. There are a number of user on Mac which run the wallet, and have not experienced your problems. If you have access to another Mac or a virtual machine, you can convince yourself that it's not an XSPEC issue.
UPDATE: I was able to get into the Slack channel. and direct messaged jbg who invited me into the support chat. It seems that the "Spectre quit unexpectedly" error is for Mac versions (pre-MacOS Sierra systems). Something about a bug in Apples compiler that emits a code that works only in the latest version and not in oler versions. They are working on workaround that it will work on older macOS in the next Spectre Wallet release
I haven't received any feedback about moszcpu, so it's probably malware not related to Spectre on Mac, so it's still in the wild I guess...
EDIT: UPDATE: It turns it's adware and not malware and it's not related to XSPEC Wallet. It can be fixed by downloading etreCheck from https://www.etrecheck.com and then scanning and let it delete the file associated with moszcpu. Don't delete anything elses unless you know what you are doing or you may cause other things to stop working
Ref: https://discussions.apple.com/message/32870346?ac_cid=op123456#32870346
You Apple users are literally computer illiterate.
Perhaps you should do something technically easier like trading stocks which don't require you to download wallets.
What baffles me is that you're a full member yet ask such basic questions about system protection.
Perhaps you should do something technically easier like trading stocks which don't require you to download wallets.
What baffles me is that you're a full member yet ask such basic questions about system protection.
I'm confused are you saying that Bitcoin and crypto in general, are meant to be used only by professional programmers and developers and that all the billions of market cap is by them only, or that it's meant for non-Apple users? Or are you referring to XSPEC coin only? Or are you a Nazi?
If any of the above, I'll take your word for it, sell all my crypto and go cry in a corner... Not
Yeah I'm a nazi.
The guy is a troll. I know subtle trolling when I see it.
*He claims that XSPEC is a virus (it had to be open-source XSPEC wallet, not the hundreds of other software programs he could have downloaded, no!) when he can easily confirm it is not.
*He claims to not be a FUDDER because he has $25 (LOL!) of XSPEC in his wallet. He is even staking it (even more hilarious). What is that, like 10 cents per month?
*The guy is a full member, so he probably has a lot of money in coins too, and quite some experience with all of this.
Then he comes up with a debunked XSPEC = scam theory.
Oh well...
Pffffffffff The superficial brains on some people
Why do people jump to assume that I am troll or I have a lot of coins because I am a full member?
Again, to those Software Engineering, IT Doctorates and Nazis: The internet does not belong to you and crypto doesn't either! I could be an arts teacher or a philosopher, an anarchist, or an anti-NWO. Or even an actual retard with very low IQ and slow learning curve. Whatever I am does it matter? I presented a legit issue and I am legitly trying to solve my "illiterate" Mac problem.
Also, I havent been able to mine my "$25 worth of XSPEC" yet because I am still unable to open the wallet on Mac and I wasn't planning to buy more than that amount until I make sure the wallet works and is supported.
Big Thank you to the good and patient people that provided useful info!
I found their slack on the project page. I will submit my email and try to get some support in their slack
Why the fuck do you insist on calling people nazis?
The overuse of that word is what makes the world forget what nazis really stand for.
Seriously, you seem to be ignorant as fuck and equally as clueless.
Nazis... Fascists... same garbage. I don't insist on calling people Nazis. Only the ones that lightly admit being that, and people exerting such behavior . In this case you and ur buddy that u quoted. But that's off-topic. I'm not trying to teach anyone how to be a decent human being and not a jump-into-conclusions know-it-all.
This is not a social behavior thread. It's an XSPEC thread for people that are invested in it or want to learn about it. Making ridiculous assumptions and jumping into conclusions instead of trying to answer questions or help doesnt help anyone.
Jump to: