Hello,
I would like to know how confident are you of making it completely anonymous ?
Stealth adress are not default yet, and that is an a real issue for the sucess of the coin.
The tech is no yet better than the competitor that is why the price isn't skyrocking yet.
Any clue ?
Thank you
I don't see how stealth transactions not being the default would be an issue, could you explain it? The current setup shares many characteristics with the Zerocoin protocol, it cannot be deanonymized by looking at the public transactions alone. Well, unless the user makes an obvious mistake, for example creating a certain amount of tokens, sending the exact amount to someone else, and then this person transfers the entire balance to public balance again. Of course then these can be correlated, but that's not how you are supposed to use it. To make these things less dependent on the user's knowledge, it will become the default in the future, so that no public balances are being used to begin with.
The tech doesn't have to be "better" than any competitors, the interesting question is which consequences choosing a certain solution comes with. The tech itself just has to do the job.
As for stealth
addresses (which you were asking about), each newly created wallet has a default stealth address.
I hate DeepOnion but is there a reason why it's excluded in that list?
Which is the better privacy coin? I'm honestly asking because I have no clue.
Take a look here:
https://altcoinwiki.org/en/SpectreCoin#DeepOnion
There was a problem with leveldb compatibility (that's the reason for the delay) but it has been fixed. Binaries should come out today I would guess.
