Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN]Spectrecoin[XSPEC] TOR+OBFS4, Ring Sig, Stealth! - page 9. (Read 94892 times)

newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
I have respect in both, but it was not the case when I was parting honestly.
Market evaluation is tough.
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 104
I dumped my Nexus at $9 and bought xpec at $4.4.
Not that Nexus is a great coin but I shouldn't have done that.
Still no word on stealth staking and it's May. SpectreCoin is shit. I'm gonna do some market research and dump my coins and invest in something with a better future and that doesn't look as amateurish as this.
But gonna wait until Wisp fork and dump both.
What a fucking joke. At least I can say that this was the stupidest thing I've done in the crypto world. Bought in to shillers, lol.
hero member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 568
bought @ 2,5 $ still hoping for good news... hodl Wink

Keep your faith on XSPEC..... and you have no other choice.  Grin Grin
Actually, it is not so bad. You still have 0.45$ per XSPEC and you can expect for the pump of XSPEC.
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
Hope the price will go up quickly
legendary
Activity: 1019
Merit: 1001
Spectreproject Community Manager
Please understand, staking is actually a form of mining......and dependent on several things. Your balance, connection and the amount held by other wallets. Just as in in mining......rewards are not guaranteed. But you can't get anything unless you participate.
This is true of every POS coin out there.
Good luck everyone.
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 104
Staking broken again.
Last received reward 18th April, that was 16 days ago while staking reward is between 9-12 days.
full member
Activity: 150
Merit: 100
update : namewastaken

So now 6 weeks after the WISP vapor-fork announcement...
And spikes as high as 8500 sat, XSPEC is back to the pre-fork range of 5000 sat.

Another example of active trading dramatically outperforming hodling in crypto. 

that's a way to see it, i know i'm now switching my strategy to active trading due to that happening many times over the past year
legendary
Activity: 1588
Merit: 1000

So now 6 weeks after the WISP vapor-fork announcement...
And spikes as high as 8500 sat, XSPEC is back to the pre-fork range of 5000 sat.

Another example of active trading dramatically outperforming hodling in crypto. 
legendary
Activity: 1019
Merit: 1001
Spectreproject Community Manager
I've been away on vacation and dependable, usuable net connections have been scarce.
I hope people begin to realize that Spectrecoin is progressing smoothly with the guidance of the original Project Manager Mandica.
Our bi-weekly newsletters give insight to what has been done this past month.
https://news.spectreproject.io/

We appreciate the continuing support of people for xspec through these confusing times but, everyone will see things for what they are as time goes by.... Wink


newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
bought @ 2,5 $ still hoping for good news... hodl Wink
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
Will Spectrecoin be listed on bittrex one day when mandica releases her personal identity which seems to be required for that?

Once it would be done there could flow so much money in this fantastic coin that 50$ or even more could be possible. Cool
member
Activity: 128
Merit: 10
I see many talks about Spectrecoin (XSPEC) now.   Think this coin will be $0.90 in next few days.   And heading to $3, then $5.  Coming fast.  Gotta move fast in crypto.
 
hero member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 515
Coin Mage

The time of the fork is not fixed yet, first it has to be implemented. Then we will be testing it. Then a date will be set.

For questions regarding Wisp, please use the Wisp thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pre-ann-wisp-project-wisp-alternative-spectrecoin-wallet-community-driven-3371587
newbie
Activity: 420
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 515
Coin Mage
No worries cheers for explaining, when there's a wisp github I'll contribute to it too. You mind me asking what Linux system you're running it on without this issue? My guess is something OpenSSL related, even though I built 1.1 from source (as detailed in the build instructions I updated). It's probably missing some paths as 1.0 is my default. Knowing if you're on stretch/bionic or would be useful to look into it further to resolve.

I'm using Fedora. Uhm you should certainly not try to compile OpenSSL from scratch, unless you are tracking security issues daily and know which compiler flags to use. You should downgrade to an earlier version of the wallet that still uses OpenSSL 1.0 (which is Spectrecoin 1.3.5), and use the OpenSSL package provided by your package manager.

I wrote a guide for this earlier: https://github.com/bitcoinx2/spectre/wiki/Installation-Guides

If you want to use the staking donation feature you should additionally adjust the donation address manually to the one owned by Mandica.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 2213
How can it be dependent on my laptop speed? I just said that I can run the wallet fine in a Windows environment (using WINE in Linux), but not built from source in Linux. The timeout is within seconds when in a Linux environment, but much longer from the Windows executable. As I referenced in the bug report on Github, I am able to run the wallet in Linux environment when I've extracted peers from the wineprefix. Care to elaborate?

Summary: There is nothing wrong with my laptop. I'm able to run the wallet in Linux without problems after bypassing the timeout issue.

Sorry, not sure. This isn't exactly great code: https://github.com/XSPECOfficial/spectre/blob/f20b8aeea822661a5ced22504bed41a8729afe0c/src/init.cpp#L777 It's probably a result of how Tor is interfaced. I have no idea how the hostname file gets updated, your best bet to get a detailed explanation for this would be JBG in the Wisp Discord.

As I said I'm also running the Linux wallet and never had this issue.

No worries cheers for explaining, when there's a wisp github I'll contribute to it too. You mind me asking what Linux system you're running it on without this issue? My guess is something OpenSSL related, even though I built 1.1 from source (as detailed in the build instructions I updated). It's probably missing some paths as 1.0 is my default. Knowing if you're on stretch/bionic or would be useful to look into it further to resolve.
legendary
Activity: 1588
Merit: 1000
Hello guys, how do you think. What is coin more private and stealth: Deeponion, XSPEC or ZCASH. What is technology between these coins more modern?
DeepOnion is like the little brother of Verge.  Cheesy

With small caps it's not about tech... it's all about telling a Good Story Smiley
full member
Activity: 121
Merit: 100
Hey guys, i have downloaded the newest wallet 1.3.8 and it crashes on my mac while starting. I have osx el capitan. Any updates?
member
Activity: 128
Merit: 10
Think is the best privacy coin.  imo, it will 10x at least.

Long term, i think XSPEC can go to $40 - $50 from current levels.

hero member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 515
Coin Mage
How can it be dependent on my laptop speed? I just said that I can run the wallet fine in a Windows environment (using WINE in Linux), but not built from source in Linux. The timeout is within seconds when in a Linux environment, but much longer from the Windows executable. As I referenced in the bug report on Github, I am able to run the wallet in Linux environment when I've extracted peers from the wineprefix. Care to elaborate?

Summary: There is nothing wrong with my laptop. I'm able to run the wallet in Linux without problems after bypassing the timeout issue.

Sorry, not sure. This isn't exactly great code: https://github.com/XSPECOfficial/spectre/blob/f20b8aeea822661a5ced22504bed41a8729afe0c/src/init.cpp#L777 It's probably a result of how Tor is interfaced. I have no idea how the hostname file gets updated, your best bet to get a detailed explanation for this would be JBG in the Wisp Discord.

As I said I'm also running the Linux wallet and never had this issue.
Pages:
Jump to: