Topic: [ANN][SRC] Securecoin | A Fast and Secure Version of Bitcoin | 2013 - page 25. (Read 195277 times)

around 25 a day but thats irrelevant

I agree, I did find some blocks, but not as many as Veget and my local hashrate stats were pretty much matching his pool reported stats most of the time, although the pool would report me as being 2-5x as much as him. I'm not a coder either(or haven't done any in 20 years), so I don't have an answer as to why that is either. Seems to be an issue on all qrk/src pools though, none are reporting hashrate proper, and even the smallest guy on the pools will find several blocks in a row sometimes. Doesn't make much sense to me either really =) I just have the hardware to help test.

When Veget was mining with swiftshoot and one or two other miners Veget was getting 3.5 SRC/block found (with 2.5 Mh/s). When 2many280s and Spoetnik came in Veget was earning 0.6 SRC/block found. Meanwhile the total number of block found by the pool (mostly by Veget) was not increased like it should have. The difference (2.9 SRC per block) was like absorbed by users 2many280s and Spoetnik because of the distribution of the SRC pool stock to the different miners proportionally to their purported hashrate. As their hashrate are much higher than anybody else they effectively take most of the profits of the blocks founds by the other miners for themselves. If they would have found the correct number of block they should have with their hashrate it would have increased total pool supply of SRC and I would not be complaining needless to say.

2many280s: I acknowledge you found blocks at the crypto-expert pool for this I have no explanation... But on coinex you did not found the huge amount of blocks that you should have for your hashrate that is for sure.

I am no coder nor cryptanalyst I cannot help more.

Depends on the difficulty and pool luck, since coinmine.pl gets all the blocks anyway, But that is about what I report locally on the machines I had on coinex or what I ran on crypto-expert full time. The bigger xeon rigs I only run full power for 8 hours a night since they are power hungry and my electricity is free from 10pm to 6am.

That seems broadly in line with about 1Mh/s-1.25Mh/s, or a little bit more?
I've been getting a bit less than 5 SRC a day with about 240kh/s [on coinmine]

Found a block on crypto-expert now, so whatever the time was from my last post with the valid/invalid share percentage to now to find a block.

[/quote]

That is possible, no one is on the crypto-expert pool right now it looks like, so I moved some cpus over there to see what happens now that diff has come down some. The pool dashboard shows me to have 7 invalids out of 3,752 valids so far which is .08% and within the normal threshold. If you have an account there, you can see we were finding all the blocks there for quite a while until the pool went down a few times and we moved to coinex. There was one user there throwing tons of invalids, but it wasn't anyone using the miner compiled by Spoetnik. The three that were, were the ones finding all the blocks.

EDIT: Just thought I would add, that on coinex I was withdrawing around 20-21 src per day, and before Crytpo-Expert went down, my auto withdraws were 20-21 per day also.

SecureCoin gets a small mention in the upcoming CryptoNerd article

Ah, someone coherent to talk to
At least on CoinEx, the shares don't seem to be leading to blocks, otherwise you would surely have expected one of you to have found one of the last 15 blocks, as you had [a very large percentage] of the pool hashrate?
I suspect that the shares generated are invalid in a way that passes the pool's checks, but fail to generate blocks.

But faster there means generating more hashes per second.
That is what the incrementally better releases in the QRK thread were doing.
What you have posted is something generating more shares with exactly the same hashrate, that is very different.


Perhaps that is because you are generating invalid shares, which cannot solve a block?

Still you both are not finding blocks nor increasing the number of block founds by the pool altough meanwhile you are getting your part of SRC proportional to that inflated hashrate hence it is not fair for other miners who are actually trying to do fruitful work and be paid for it correctly...

I hope the pools will find a way to invalidate those illegitimate shares and reward miners only for shares which are actually useful to find a block...

Why do not you both try to solomine with your high hashrate meanwhile?


Baritus : OK thank you, then it is the duty of the pools to find a way about this issue then IMHO. BTW your coin run very smooth, Baritus... good work

This has nothing to do with the coin's security.

well said and i have also said what i am running and whee i go from a MILLION times
and i don't see the usual jerks that troll on me constantly posting those quotes.
ill give you a hint i mentioned it already 3 comments up..

and to that other guy YES i was the only guy on Ahmeds pool by myself and i found the last block and i can prove it too !

Don;t you god damn dare accuse me of cheating ..i have been 100% open and honest about every micro aspect of it all
and you guys bitching here know that because i remeber telling you all this far too many times
yet Eliot for example keeps thinking no matter what i tell him i created some magical cheating client .....and he wants it and keeps asking for it
while attacking me at the same time and now coming here and pulling this carp while still begging.

Spots a troll so no need to explain that.. master of childish insults lol

But i expect better from you Eliot.. your just trolling on me here and trying to make me look bad based on nothing
and i have offered you the source code so screw you ..don't accuse me of anything

oh and also gave it to 2many28s and the pool operator Ahmed so if there was anything dishonest they would know.

the key issue is there are different versions pre-built some with source code and so with none and some of them are WAY faster than others
and i have said this sooooo many times i'm getting tired off it.. you wanna accuse anyone of anything you picked the wrong guy..
you should be picking on Neisklar and UncleBob (Github names)
all their own comments and files etc are available freely over at the QRK ANN topic so don't crucify me because people are too lazy to go read it..

edit:
Eliot didn't you tell me you were making like 60 coins a day or something ?
i make maybe 10 if i'm lucky.. real lucky
and i have made all time maybe 350 coins
so please go ahead and tell everyone how many you made lol

That's both of the things we have been trying to find out, although the shares are leading to found blocks also, there seems to be a massive discrepancy in hash rate reported between local and coinex and number of valid shares submitted vs the regular minerd64_sse4. On the Crypto-expert pool, which has round stats, the invalid % is in the 0.1 range for thousands of shares, so it's not submitting worthless invalid shares, but is submitting quite a few more valid ones between rounds than the sse4 version.

My equipment is 2 Supermicro 2u units, one with dual 6 core westmeres (24 cores) and another dual quad core HT xeon (16 cores) and an i5 (4 cores)
on Coinex pool, All of that will break 30mhs, isn't right when locally I'm reporting 100-115(sse4)-150+(spoetnik's sse4.1)khs per core. The amount of blocks found at current diff though, is in line with what I should be finding.

He's not actively trying to rip anyone off, just trying to increase the speed of the miner, and we have gone through several version tests already, and the one time the pool share discrepancy way over paid me on 2 blocks, I tracked down the finder (swiftshoot) and gave him the coins, and moved the largest part of my rig over to coinmine.pl where the other big guys are to keep from taking more. It's not an easy problem to track down, 3 pools, 3 different results, and no easy way to test other than on a pool.... Hopefully CaptainFuture can find out what is causing the massive share difference at coinex and resulting mega hash rate difference.

I'll just leave this here:

Spoetnik: and accusing me of cheating because i went to github and grabbed some guys code and compiled it (UncleBob's)

Spoetnik: @2many280s: people in thsi scene are ultra mega fucking stupid and paranoid and greedy and selfish and assholes..

Spoetnik: if i had a way to cheat i would join that pool and cheat..

Spoetnik: @jamestown2035823: i never cheated fuck all ever buddy


The guy is delusional. Best to let him do his own thing and just completely ignore him. Watch, he's about to go apeshit about me right now

Ok.
a) Why is one miner generating more than 10 times as many shares, at the same hashrate?
b) Why do these shares not seem to be leading to any found blocks?

your the one going around throwing insults, i dont have a compiling environment nor do i wish to set one up, im not a coder and you already have the binary

holier than thou attitude doesnt = jerk

where have i said i didnt want your miner?

feel free to ask me rather than speculate i coded the damn miner and made the screen shot guy