Topic: ★[ANN][SUB1X| 🚀The Lowest Supply Masternode Coin🚀 | 500%+ APR | Zerocoin ★ - page 20. (Read 14232 times)

in the meantime, the mn's just keep growing PAST the limit  

can we get a breakdown on the plan for the inflation?

The limit worked, but it was impractical. If a person lost their node for any particular reason (e.g. network going down) then it would result in them losing their place. Also, the issue of DDOS attacks.

We are currently working on solutions for these problems, if people vote to bring back the limit.

so why not just leave locked until node governance, why the temporary change, the point ?

The limit has not been permanently removed. It's temporary and will be determined by node governance.

I'm no masternode expert, but that looks like high inflation to me.

there is low inflation on the coin due to rewards of pos and mn's
which means the supply will grow above the 10k INITIAL supply, but very slowly and still be low supply
someone correct me if I am wrong please

When I invested in this I was under the impression that the masternode hardcap was 250 and the max supply is 10,000. Those were the two main reasons I invested.

It appears that the masternode cap was removed based on voting. I question the method in which the voting was done.

Also, based on the block explorer the current supply is 10611.27348952. This is above 10,000.

I can see how removing the masternode cap and putting these coins on mnrank.com masternodes.pro and masternodes.online would appreciate more in the short term, but i was not thinking short term. I was thinking i am buying something that only has 250 in the world and it would be a wonderful gift to give my children. By then maybe it would create enough so that they don't have to work. I bought this for this super long term gamble, hoping that the various other attractive features would draw investors to the coin on exchanges.

Also, in response to the ddos problem with masternodes, here is a possible solution: (i am a programmer but have not worked with programming crypto)

When coins are sent to an address on the blockchain and activated as a masternode, then that masternode reserves a provable spot based on the coins in that address. I was under the impression that this person is now permanently allowed to have a masternode and it would be reserved even if he was kicked offline because he has 20 coins in that address still. So there would basically be a queue of addresses that are allowed to be activated by the activate masternode command, and no new masternodes could be created unless one of these addresses no longer has 20 coins in it. Honestly it should be up to this person whether they want to set up a masternode for their coins or not. If they want to reserve a spot and not use it then its whatever, more coins for us.

I am still optimistic for the future but these are just my thoughts on recent changes.

I'm not fully understanding that
I keep saying
a rise in mn's = a change (lower) in mn owners rewards amount is what I said

I know dyal mentioned low supply would be effected, but I know it would not.

or am i misunderstanding something here

A change in the supply doesn't equate to a change in everybody's stake. Proportionally everyone would still hold the same amount of coins.

yes pos, another incentive as to why they would still buy!
to say "the incentive isn't there to buy" once mn's sold out is hog wash
my point exactly

and I love the queue idea

Initially, the idea of ​​the project was good! So I would not change anything. As for that phrase. that new investors will not buy as there will not be an opportunity to run the masternode - it is not entirely correct. First you can put the masternode in the queue. And as soon as for some reason, someone's masterpiece will stop working (zaglyuchit, hang or just be a permutation of the purse), then someone else will take his place. This is a distinctive feature of this coin.
Also, please do not forget that the coin has a POS staking algorithm. This, too, can attract new investors.

Try to reduce the number

maxconnections =

(in sub1x.conf, default 125)

Usually a heavy load happens at the time of data exchange.

i was answering dyal about low supply ... low supply doesnt have to do with the removal limit of masternodes amount (exactly, i agree)
but it does have to do with lowering mn owners rewards, since as mn's rise, rewards shrink
but hey, apparently "the majority" (in telegram) wanted that?

and I know big investors will still buy, but there will be less mn sales once its very expensive to obtain
I had said "once the mn's are so expensive, people won't buy mn's AS MUCH"

right now every tom, dick and harry are buying them up
which does ruin the " Subject THE LOWEST SUPPLY MASTERNODE COIN " USP as stated

"I think it is fair for big investor to have a masternode"
so you think its fair that I invested expecting limited mn's and now its no longer true?
sorry, I don't feel it is fair

my rewards will keep shrinking as more mn's are being bought, which the limit would have prevented.
so please forgive me for not being a fan or supporter of limit being removed.

but as I also stated, whatever is best for the coin

I don't think low supply have to do with the removal limit of masternodes amount. Low supply means the coins are in low volume as there will be no more creating of more coin and the supply of those coin will remain the same till the end. With the removal of masternodes limit and low supply, each masternode will become too expensive to obtain and I think it is fair for big investor to have a masternode.

You can check your SUB1X MasterNodes here:

  http://sub1x.mn.zone

Star yours and make sure they are running, up-to-date and giving you the expected ROI!

Cheers!

Is there another one that attracts high CPU loads with Windows wallet? Sad

"" Subject THE LOWEST SUPPLY MASTERNODE COIN ""

and you removed the mn limit 

this was your USP of this coin ?! Please think about this decision!

thanks for chipping in on thoughts ...
the low supply will not be removed
the set rewards will be split between more mn's making less rewards for mn' holders
which is what I didn't want to see happen which happens for all other mn's
now I have to wait until the mn's are so expensive, people won't buy as much to see what my rewards will actually be

To remove the node limit is soo stupid...
Most of the community just want a low supply coin, this is why i invested here.
Just a few spamer in the telegramm group dont want a node limit  
I totaly agree with mrsray, the low supply is one of the main feature, if you remove this you will lose many Investors.

It turns out that the restriction is lifted? How are you going to find out about the 250 limit in the poll, if the node is already on the network 251?