Well, "master nodes" the concern expressed on the advertising graphics is valid, but delivered wrongly.
The issue with "master nodes" is the fact that one has to buy into a priviledged position on a p2p network of equals. That is simply against the people's believes and wishes. Everybody participating in a network for exchanging a currency should have equal rights.
A comparison: If people are used to democracy, one cannot stage ballots with one candidate, and one winning candidate only. Even if that one should be a "benevolent dictator", still would be one. Not exactly the usual outcome of ballots inside democratic states. So any coin based on "master nodes" is a dead end, seemingly the free market allready voted like that.
There you got an edge above competitors!
But that's politics, some thing to clearly avoid in advertising, articles, or anything! Get Edward outa there, asap. That is no Meme to use at all.
The girls are sexy, but please stay covered there. This isn't hooker's coin.
You are on a valid path. Just deliver the technology and then start a bragging campaign that cryptocoiners hadn't recognized anything, are slow to percieve, like that. Then they will rush in. Investors are nervous after recent history. Keep that in mind.
Thanks, as you said we are democratic cryptocoin. You made me see a really good point. This (supercoin) may shown as a democratic gentlemen others may seem to have fascist dictators.