Hi to all users of a cool coin Tesla!
I want to ask - I received coins on August 10. Now I do not need to touch them for a month and they bring a profit to me on 10 September?
How much will I receive coins for 100 coins per month? 1%?
And is it necessary to keep the wallet online or does the maturing of coins not depend on it?
I apologize for many questions
Hi, it would be great to hold your coins for a while. Crypto surge is just starting so next 5 - 10 years will bring huge opportunities. I think current stake rate is 12% yearly. But if it's mined out soon there will be no to very minimal stake me thinks. Your wallet should be online and unlocked. You can't stake if it's locked.
Edit: Good news my wallet staking again.
Great to read your wallet is staking again
Hello, I would like to invest heavily in this project, but what's up with the wallet? I downloaded 32bit version (64 doesn't work) and used the last bootstrap, it synced correctly so I sent 40k TES as a test but they never arrive. My adress is 5pP1wnVpsukyWax68kbWJAhaszKxyzgcJL and the transaction number is 680fb05e3934cd4af6d8d21a4d1141938988cdd04fd43eb90dbf45a21b559707f45a21b559707 but in the block explorer nothing appears. Does that mean I lost them?
You're tx will be included. Don't worry.
I still haven't received any coins since the 4th of August, but it's fine I'll be patient.
well, your tx is the slowest tx I've ever seen in TES history. Where did you sent it from? Hope is not yobit...
There is auxPow option which uses the PoW that already exists. Problem there is that we need to have enought economical motivation for pool to include us and mining centralization.
My concern is that if we move back to regular PoW, will we still be the "energy efficient coin"? I'm concerned that returning to regular PoW would contradict that.
I see your point. From marketing perspective it won't help to Tesla's green name.
But the point is that it would be more energy efficient than even PoS. We would be using the energy it's already been used.
That's PoS about. The ones who have more stake are the most interested in keep the blockchain running.
Other option is the masternodes.
What I mean is that if the PoS work ends up being *only* done by those with the most coins, and they get so much priority others literally can't stake, then they become, by default, "masternodes". I'm not saying it shouldn't exist to some degree, just suggesting an equation that could ensure that it is not programmed into the system that "only" those individuals can stake but that is be programmed in to ensure others can still contribute (especially if the big dogs aren't available at a given moment).
The biggest concern is to keep blockchain running 24/7.
Not that important who provides nodes/staking, because from an economic perspective it won't be too profitable. (fees are not that high, and until we can achieve the critical mass adoption, there won't be too many tx).
Indeed the most probable situation will be the ones supporting the network loosing money (Having a 24/7 active raspberry is not expensive (1$/month), I'll have some of them).
So from an economic point of view, anyone who loves and supports this proyect, will be able to "stake". (we still have pending who takes the fees, but it wont be that important)
What happens when no one is staking at given time and people want to buy things with Teslacoin?
We expect that doesn't happen
It has been happening here and there the last couple of weeks, I was merely pointing out, in my prior post, ways to impede and or eliminate that regardless of the fluctuations in the network because, right now, its the algorithms that are allowing these dead times right now; and its not for lack of wallets open, its for lack of available staking coins to use to build blocks.
If you don't prioritize in some way then what decides who gets to win the "battle" of the hashes and gets the fee for the block over everyone else?
Shall it be the one who gets it done fastest? Oh wait, now we're back to PoW.
See the cycle?
I see. Yes, fee distribution it's a point we need to work on...
The first node to distribute the tx get the fee is an option.
What I mean is it goes back to the PoW (and therefor lack energy efficiency) if we just say whoever does it "first". Even if we just let the wallet program "handle" this PoW mining it'll still be whomever has the fastest processor the wallet is running on who will get the tx fee, therefor starting a race to have the fastest computer and spend the most electricity to complete the node first. That's why I was thinking something that pivots off of Proof of Stake, but that is programmed not to only allow those who have the most coins to be the only ones to perform proof of stake either. Any big dogs who suddenly send their coins to another wallet or sell them would cause a huge drop in the efficiency of the network if others couldn't pitch in at that time.
Now I see what you mean.
Having PoW ruins the "energy efficient" image of TES
Having PoS means you have to have a very high % of the total supply "staking" to have an stable network. (let's say 90%, so if any big dog sends his coins (10%), it's still 80% of the coins staking)
Did I get it right?