[ANN][The Original Multipool - Scrypt/SHA256/Scrypt-N/X11] multipool.us - page 173.

flound1129

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

www.multipool.us

Quote from: Bitmong on August 08, 2013, 02:43:07 PM

I found a bug in the Add worker feature on the site.

I was trying to add a worker with name 6870_777 (for my rig that has 6870 & 7770 cards in it). The Add worker button complained that I should try a different name.

I was able to add that worker when I removed the _ character from the name. However, after that I was able to rename the worker to use the name 6870_777 with the Update worker button.

So, either both of those features should allow underscores or neither one..

- Bitmong

Fixed, thank you.

Aurum

sr. member

Activity: 453

Merit: 250

dfgfdgfdg

Quote from: Bitmong on August 08, 2013, 02:59:16 PM

Well, actually one fan on the 7950 is broken, that is why I run it at lower clock than usually, so that it won't get too much heat.

My results with higher TC have been worse, 8192 gives the best results for me.. I don't know why that is so.

- Bitmong

I bought a new fan for $14 on ebay and fixed my 5970 with just a screwdriver.

Bitmong

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Well, actually one fan on the 7950 is broken, that is why I run it at lower clock than usually, so that it won't get too much heat.

My results with higher TC have been worse, 8192 gives the best results for me.. I don't know why that is so.

- Bitmong

kslavik

sr. member

Activity: 441

Merit: 250

GET IN - Smart Ticket Protocol - Live in market!

Quote from: Bitmong on August 08, 2013, 02:36:14 PM

Quote from: kslavik on August 08, 2013, 01:41:17 PM

Look at your hardware errors - compare # of submitted shares to the # of shares shown inside the pool stats - they will much, but you must fix your HW errors before you can expect your hash rate to match to your hashrate at the pool's stats.

Edit: what GPUs are you using, please consider increasing thread-concurrency to a higher #

I fixed the HW errors on GPU1 by decreasing intensity from 18 to 13.

GPU0 is a 7870xt with 15232 thread concurrency, GPU1 is a 7950 with 8192 thread concurrency. These are the optimum values that I have found by trying several different values.

- Bitmong

7950 (depending on the card) would need at least 14300 (from my experience), and 22400 for the best results with intensity of 18-20 (depending on the card). Anything lower then 14K would produce a lot of HW errors.

I have two 7950: and both of them are doing scrypt mining at 625-650Kh/s at 22400TC

You might run into errors if you you don't have enough system memory.

Edit: try fixing HW not with intensity decrease, but with some other setting (like TC), I have found that most cards for optimal speed would need at least 18 intensity

Bitmong

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

I found a bug in the Add worker feature on the site.

I was trying to add a worker with name 6870_777 (for my rig that has 6870 & 7770 cards in it). The Add worker button complained that I should try a different name.

I was able to add that worker when I removed the _ character from the name. However, after that I was able to rename the worker to use the name 6870_777 with the Update worker button.

So, either both of those features should allow underscores or neither one..

- Bitmong

Bitmong

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Quote from: kslavik on August 08, 2013, 01:41:17 PM

Look at your hardware errors - compare # of submitted shares to the # of shares shown inside the pool stats - they will much, but you must fix your HW errors before you can expect your hash rate to match to your hashrate at the pool's stats.

Edit: what GPUs are you using, please consider increasing thread-concurrency to a higher #

I fixed the HW errors on GPU1 by decreasing intensity from 18 to 13.

GPU0 is a 7870xt with 15232 thread concurrency, GPU1 is a 7950 with 8192 thread concurrency. These are the optimum values that I have found by trying several different values.

- Bitmong

flound1129

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

www.multipool.us

Quote from: Bitmong on August 08, 2013, 01:25:02 PM

PhenixCoin at that point, but I think it happened also with Feathercoin.

I'll keep monitoring for this issue and report on what coins it happens with.

- Bitmong

This was an issue on PXC and CAP, I have updated the pool config and this should not happen again.

flound1129

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

www.multipool.us

Quote from: kslavik on August 08, 2013, 01:41:17 PM

Quote from: Bitmong on August 08, 2013, 12:58:08 PM

I just started mining on the pool1.eu.multipool.us (I am in Finland), and my hashrate shown on the website is 50-70% of the hashrate CGMiner shows me.

I also get lots of rejects:

GPU 0: 81.0C 3383RPM | 386.7K/378.3Kh/s | A:114 R:89 HW: 6 U:2.55/m I:18
GPU 1: 73.0C 3624RPM | 319.6K/303.1Kh/s | A: 79 R:63 HW:32 U:1.77/m I:18

Rejects show this message:

[2013-08-08 20:57:43] Rejected a615ddd1 Diff 9.86K/64 GPU 0 pool 0 (DBInterface instance has no

Is that some error on the pool software? Unfortunately I cannot see the complete error message from my CGMiner output.

- Bitmong

Look at your hardware errors - compare # of submitted shares to the # of shares shown inside the pool stats - they will much, but you must fix your HW errors before you can expect your hash rate to match to your hashrate at the pool's stats.

Edit: what GPUs are you using, please consider increasing thread-concurrency to a higher #

At intensity 18 you are going to get hardware errors pretty much no matter what, I suggest max of 13 for scrypt mining.

kslavik

sr. member

Activity: 441

Merit: 250

GET IN - Smart Ticket Protocol - Live in market!

Quote from: Bitmong on August 08, 2013, 12:58:08 PM

I just started mining on the pool1.eu.multipool.us (I am in Finland), and my hashrate shown on the website is 50-70% of the hashrate CGMiner shows me.

I also get lots of rejects:

GPU 0: 81.0C 3383RPM | 386.7K/378.3Kh/s | A:114 R:89 HW: 6 U:2.55/m I:18
GPU 1: 73.0C 3624RPM | 319.6K/303.1Kh/s | A: 79 R:63 HW:32 U:1.77/m I:18

Rejects show this message:

[2013-08-08 20:57:43] Rejected a615ddd1 Diff 9.86K/64 GPU 0 pool 0 (DBInterface instance has no

Is that some error on the pool software? Unfortunately I cannot see the complete error message from my CGMiner output.

- Bitmong

Look at your hardware errors - compare # of the submitted shares to the # of shares shown inside the pool stats - they will match, but you must fix your HW errors before you can expect your hash rate to match to your hashrate at the pool's stats.

Edit: what GPUs are you using, please consider increasing thread-concurrency to a higher #

Bitmong

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

PhenixCoin at that point, but I think it happened also with Feathercoin.

I'll keep monitoring for this issue and report on what coins it happens with.

- Bitmong

flound1129

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

www.multipool.us

Quote from: Bitmong on August 08, 2013, 12:58:08 PM

I just started mining on the pool1.eu.multipool.us (I am in Finland), and my hashrate shown on the website is 50-70% of the hashrate CGMiner shows me.

I also get lots of rejects:

GPU 0: 81.0C 3383RPM | 386.7K/378.3Kh/s | A:114 R:89 HW: 6 U:2.55/m I:18
GPU 1: 73.0C 3624RPM | 319.6K/303.1Kh/s | A: 79 R:63 HW:32 U:1.77/m I:18

Rejects show this message:

[2013-08-08 20:57:43] Rejected a615ddd1 Diff 9.86K/64 GPU 0 pool 0 (DBInterface instance has no

Is that some error on the pool software? Unfortunately I cannot see the complete error message from my CGMiner output.

- Bitmong

Yes, that definitely looks like an issue with the pool software. Do you know what coin we were mining when you got this error?

Bitmong

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

I just started mining on the pool1.eu.multipool.us (I am in Finland), and my hashrate shown on the website is 50-70% of the hashrate CGMiner shows me.

I also get lots of rejects:

GPU 0: 81.0C 3383RPM | 386.7K/378.3Kh/s | A:114 R:89 HW: 6 U:2.55/m I:18
GPU 1: 73.0C 3624RPM | 319.6K/303.1Kh/s | A: 79 R:63 HW:32 U:1.77/m I:18

Rejects show this message:

[2013-08-08 20:57:43] Rejected a615ddd1 Diff 9.86K/64 GPU 0 pool 0 (DBInterface instance has no

Is that some error on the pool software? Unfortunately I cannot see the complete error message from my CGMiner output.

- Bitmong

Jazkal

sr. member

Activity: 319

Merit: 250

Quote from: flound1129 on August 08, 2013, 12:46:27 PM

It's due to those blocks getting pushed out of the last 2000 transactions before they could be fully confirmed.

Normally it shouldn't happen because I scan the past 2000 transactions on every chain, every 5 minutes, it's probably due to the outage this morning and it not being able to scan for a couple hours. I'll go in and fix those blocks manually.

Cool. FTC also has a bunch of blocks like that from the same time frame.

flound1129

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

www.multipool.us

Quote from: Jazkal on August 08, 2013, 12:04:25 PM

Doing great work!

A couple of questions (that can wait till you take a breather ;-)

What does it mean when you have blocks that have confirms, but they haven't matured yet, but all the blocks on both sides have? Example: CAP blocks 65193 and 65195

Are you going to adjust the Round Time for CGB to 15mins like the other lower diff coins? Or are you trying something new with a super low 1 min Round time?

It's due to those blocks getting pushed out of the last 2000 transactions before they could be fully confirmed.

Normally it shouldn't happen because I scan the past 2000 transactions on every chain, every 5 minutes, it's probably due to the outage this morning and it not being able to scan for a couple hours. I'll go in and fix those blocks manually.

guitarplinker

legendary

Activity: 1694

Merit: 1024

Quote from: flound1129 on August 08, 2013, 11:29:14 AM

Quote from: peonminer on August 08, 2013, 11:06:30 AM

When is auto-exchange to BTC support coming??

soon(tm)

I can't wait for that, then it'll make the multipool feature more useful IMO.

Jazkal

sr. member

Activity: 319

Merit: 250

Doing great work!

A couple of questions (that can wait till you take a breather ;-)

What does it mean when you have blocks that have confirms, but they haven't matured yet, but all the blocks on both sides have? Example: CAP blocks 65193 and 65195

Are you going to adjust the Round Time for CGB to 15mins like the other lower diff coins? Or are you trying something new with a super low 1 min Round time?

flound1129

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

www.multipool.us

Quote from: peonminer on August 08, 2013, 11:06:30 AM

When is auto-exchange to BTC support coming??

soon(tm)

peonminer

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 531

Crypto is King.

When is auto-exchange to BTC support coming??

flound1129

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

www.multipool.us

Site's up, one of the coin daemons crashed last night. I've been trying to catch those exceptions in the code but they are elusive.

peonminer

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 531

Crypto is King.

Topic: [ANN][The Original Multipool - Scrypt/SHA256/Scrypt-N/X11] multipool.us - page 173. (Read 424294 times)