Verium Vault Solo Mining Can Decrease Diff
[2017-11-16 18:28:11] scrypt² block 146869, diff 0.01
[2017-11-16 18:28:18] Total: 1029.75 H/m
if possible as I do!
thank you
Topic: [ANN][VRM] Verium PoWT | CPU mining | scrypt² | Scaling | New Roadmap Released - page 3. (Read 249932 times)
November 16, 2017, 09:12:32 AM
November 16, 2017, 09:09:07 AM
Which mine is best for work a few cpu units? I mining some solo time, but no block is visible from long time 
November 16, 2017, 06:42:17 AM
to the OP: veriumlottery.win in the opening post is offline, it shows a blank page on the browser.
Requested a remove while ago, maybbe he just forgot about it. Not much interest, and with servers to keep things up..well it wasn't worth
ok
--
progress on vrm2.poolinat0r looks really slow.
also seems my shares are accepted with a very low frequency. my H/s is about 2~4K H/s
do you think a smaller pool would be better? poolinat0r hash is very high.
November 15, 2017, 10:41:02 PM
vrm.mining-pool.ovh Is down?
seems to be, i'm getting stratum authentication failed messages
November 15, 2017, 07:01:38 PM
vrm.mining-pool.ovh Is down?
November 15, 2017, 06:44:01 PM
to the OP: veriumlottery.win in the opening post is offline, it shows a blank page on the browser.
Requested a remove while ago, maybbe he just forgot about it. Not much interest, and with servers to keep things up..well it wasn't worth
November 15, 2017, 04:42:18 PM
to the OP: veriumlottery.win in the opening post is offline, it shows a blank page on the browser.
November 14, 2017, 08:45:07 AM
Hello there.
I started solo mining Verium some days ago in an old six-core Xeon E5645.
I got arround 1700-1800 H/m with 11 threads.
However, I only mine from 10pm to 8am, when electricity is cheaper.
I still got 0,00000... and the days to find a block don't seem to get any lower.
I'm I doing something wrong? When mining solo I have to have it working 24/7, or not?
Thanks.
I started solo mining Verium some days ago in an old six-core Xeon E5645.
I got arround 1700-1800 H/m with 11 threads.
However, I only mine from 10pm to 8am, when electricity is cheaper.
I still got 0,00000... and the days to find a block don't seem to get any lower.
I'm I doing something wrong? When mining solo I have to have it working 24/7, or not?
Thanks.
November 13, 2017, 10:53:59 PM
So after 7 hours running on vrm1.poolinat0r:4443 At an average 17,000h/m For 2 workers I got 0.21 vrms??? Is something wrong?
how many coin you get normally?? i also seems get less coin recently around 30% less, but using pool bloxtor
Lol a friend of mine got 8 vrm by solo mining, with 15,000 h/m. You should consider it too
If I have a bunch of machines, is it better for each one to mine solo or to combine them for a total hash rate? What would give me the best outscome? I currently have 40,000h/m combined and mining at a pool but getting only around 3 vrm a day. Thank you
Combine, of course. November 13, 2017, 10:50:37 PM
If I have a bunch of machines, is it better for each one to mine solo or to combine them for a total hash rate? What would give me the best outscome? I currently have 40,000h/m combined and mining at a pool but getting only around 3 vrm a day. Thank you
November 13, 2017, 02:57:36 PM
normal
November 13, 2017, 08:05:36 AM
Sorri my eng translated by google
Can you help with verium.conf Verium vault Windows?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verium vault installed Windows 10 example ip 88.12.34.44 internal 192.168.1.100
1)Miner Linux XU4 Ubuntu ip 192.168.1.101
2)Miner Linux XU4 Ubuntu ip 192.168.1.102
3)Miner Linux XU4 Ubuntu ip 192.168.1.103
my verium.config and correct or mistake anything?
i'm afraid to talk but i do not visualize h / m in the vault and normal?
Can you help with verium.conf Verium vault Windows?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verium vault installed Windows 10 example ip 88.12.34.44 internal 192.168.1.100
1)Miner Linux XU4 Ubuntu ip 192.168.1.101
2)Miner Linux XU4 Ubuntu ip 192.168.1.102
3)Miner Linux XU4 Ubuntu ip 192.168.1.103
my verium.config and correct or mistake anything?
Code:
addnode=vrmsupernode.vericoin.info
addnode=vrmsupernode2.vericoin.info
server=1
listen=1
daemon=1
rpcuser=veriumuser
rpcpassword=secret
rpcallowip=192.168.1.*
rpcallowip=localhost
i'm afraid to talk but i do not visualize h / m in the vault and normal?
November 12, 2017, 03:16:08 PM
Ok thanks I read ~ 40 H/s and misinterpreted
November 12, 2017, 02:01:28 PM
Is it normal to get this low hashes with a Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz and 6 threads? They look ridicolous:
Currently mining on vrm2.poolinat0r.com
Quote
[2017-11-12 19:12:04] CPU #2: 576 H, 7.14 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:12:04] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 576 H, 7.14 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:12:26] CPU #4: 744 H, 7.21 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:12:27] Accepted 2/2 (100%), 1320 H, 14.35 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:13:05] CPU #2: 432 H, 7.09 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:28] CPU #4: 444 H, 7.19 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:58] scrypt block 145561, diff 0.013
[2017-11-12 19:13:58] CPU #2: 384 H, 7.12 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:59] CPU #5: 1404 H, 7.17 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:59] CPU #0: 1392 H, 7.08 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:59] CPU #4: 228 H, 7.20 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:00] CPU #1: 1404 H, 7.14 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:00] CPU #3: 1416 H, 7.19 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:20] CPU #5: 156 H, 7.15 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:22] Accepted 3/3 (100%), 4980 H, 42.89 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:14:59] CPU #2: 432 H, 7.15 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:00] CPU #3: 432 H, 7.18 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:00] CPU #0: 432 H, 7.12 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:00] CPU #1: 432 H, 7.13 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:01] CPU #4: 444 H, 7.20 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:07] CPU #4: 36 H, 6.39 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:08] Accepted 4/4 (100%), 1920 H, 42.11 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:15:20] CPU #0: 120 H, 5.95 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:21] Accepted 5/5 (100%), 1608 H, 40.95 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:15:22] CPU #5: 432 H, 7.06 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:01] CPU #4: 384 H, 7.11 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:02] CPU #3: 432 H, 6.95 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:03] CPU #1: 432 H, 6.86 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:03] CPU #2: 432 H, 6.72 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:11] CPU #0: 360 H, 7.09 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:22] CPU #5: 432 H, 7.17 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:12:04] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 576 H, 7.14 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:12:26] CPU #4: 744 H, 7.21 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:12:27] Accepted 2/2 (100%), 1320 H, 14.35 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:13:05] CPU #2: 432 H, 7.09 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:28] CPU #4: 444 H, 7.19 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:58] scrypt block 145561, diff 0.013
[2017-11-12 19:13:58] CPU #2: 384 H, 7.12 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:59] CPU #5: 1404 H, 7.17 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:59] CPU #0: 1392 H, 7.08 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:59] CPU #4: 228 H, 7.20 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:00] CPU #1: 1404 H, 7.14 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:00] CPU #3: 1416 H, 7.19 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:20] CPU #5: 156 H, 7.15 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:22] Accepted 3/3 (100%), 4980 H, 42.89 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:14:59] CPU #2: 432 H, 7.15 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:00] CPU #3: 432 H, 7.18 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:00] CPU #0: 432 H, 7.12 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:00] CPU #1: 432 H, 7.13 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:01] CPU #4: 444 H, 7.20 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:07] CPU #4: 36 H, 6.39 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:08] Accepted 4/4 (100%), 1920 H, 42.11 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:15:20] CPU #0: 120 H, 5.95 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:21] Accepted 5/5 (100%), 1608 H, 40.95 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:15:22] CPU #5: 432 H, 7.06 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:01] CPU #4: 384 H, 7.11 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:02] CPU #3: 432 H, 6.95 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:03] CPU #1: 432 H, 6.86 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:03] CPU #2: 432 H, 6.72 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:11] CPU #0: 360 H, 7.09 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:22] CPU #5: 432 H, 7.17 H/s
Currently mining on vrm2.poolinat0r.com
2520 h/m. correct.
November 12, 2017, 01:17:10 PM
Is it normal to get this low hashes with a Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz and 6 threads? They look ridicolous:
Currently mining on vrm2.poolinat0r.com
Quote
[2017-11-12 19:12:04] CPU #2: 576 H, 7.14 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:12:04] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 576 H, 7.14 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:12:26] CPU #4: 744 H, 7.21 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:12:27] Accepted 2/2 (100%), 1320 H, 14.35 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:13:05] CPU #2: 432 H, 7.09 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:28] CPU #4: 444 H, 7.19 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:58] scrypt block 145561, diff 0.013
[2017-11-12 19:13:58] CPU #2: 384 H, 7.12 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:59] CPU #5: 1404 H, 7.17 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:59] CPU #0: 1392 H, 7.08 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:59] CPU #4: 228 H, 7.20 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:00] CPU #1: 1404 H, 7.14 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:00] CPU #3: 1416 H, 7.19 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:20] CPU #5: 156 H, 7.15 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:22] Accepted 3/3 (100%), 4980 H, 42.89 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:14:59] CPU #2: 432 H, 7.15 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:00] CPU #3: 432 H, 7.18 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:00] CPU #0: 432 H, 7.12 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:00] CPU #1: 432 H, 7.13 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:01] CPU #4: 444 H, 7.20 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:07] CPU #4: 36 H, 6.39 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:08] Accepted 4/4 (100%), 1920 H, 42.11 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:15:20] CPU #0: 120 H, 5.95 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:21] Accepted 5/5 (100%), 1608 H, 40.95 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:15:22] CPU #5: 432 H, 7.06 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:01] CPU #4: 384 H, 7.11 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:02] CPU #3: 432 H, 6.95 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:03] CPU #1: 432 H, 6.86 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:03] CPU #2: 432 H, 6.72 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:11] CPU #0: 360 H, 7.09 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:22] CPU #5: 432 H, 7.17 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:12:04] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 576 H, 7.14 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:12:26] CPU #4: 744 H, 7.21 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:12:27] Accepted 2/2 (100%), 1320 H, 14.35 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:13:05] CPU #2: 432 H, 7.09 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:28] CPU #4: 444 H, 7.19 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:58] scrypt block 145561, diff 0.013
[2017-11-12 19:13:58] CPU #2: 384 H, 7.12 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:59] CPU #5: 1404 H, 7.17 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:59] CPU #0: 1392 H, 7.08 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:13:59] CPU #4: 228 H, 7.20 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:00] CPU #1: 1404 H, 7.14 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:00] CPU #3: 1416 H, 7.19 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:20] CPU #5: 156 H, 7.15 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:14:22] Accepted 3/3 (100%), 4980 H, 42.89 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:14:59] CPU #2: 432 H, 7.15 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:00] CPU #3: 432 H, 7.18 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:00] CPU #0: 432 H, 7.12 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:00] CPU #1: 432 H, 7.13 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:01] CPU #4: 444 H, 7.20 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:07] CPU #4: 36 H, 6.39 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:08] Accepted 4/4 (100%), 1920 H, 42.11 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:15:20] CPU #0: 120 H, 5.95 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:15:21] Accepted 5/5 (100%), 1608 H, 40.95 H/s, 0C
[2017-11-12 19:15:22] CPU #5: 432 H, 7.06 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:01] CPU #4: 384 H, 7.11 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:02] CPU #3: 432 H, 6.95 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:03] CPU #1: 432 H, 6.86 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:03] CPU #2: 432 H, 6.72 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:11] CPU #0: 360 H, 7.09 H/s
[2017-11-12 19:16:22] CPU #5: 432 H, 7.17 H/s
Currently mining on vrm2.poolinat0r.com
November 11, 2017, 01:07:57 PM
Hello guys, I was wondering if it is possible to mine VRM with one wallet and multiple PC's? To be more specific: I want to setup VRM vault on one PC and from other computers I would point (Verium Miner) to this VRM vault (PC) to mine with joint forces? 
The whole idea is that I want to solo mine VRM with total hash-rate of all computers, like own mining pool but without installing MPOS or uNOMP. Your help would be highly appreciated. Thanks
The whole idea is that I want to solo mine VRM with total hash-rate of all computers, like own mining pool but without installing MPOS or uNOMP. Your help would be highly appreciated. Thanks https://docs.google.com/document/d/19aLLX7VmwZWFSLou7nf3mcKcAGWn0emqB9noS2boEM0/edit
November 11, 2017, 01:02:21 PM
Hello guys, I was wondering if it is possible to mine VRM with one wallet and multiple PC's? To be more specific: I want to setup VRM vault on one PC and from other computers I would point (Verium Miner) to this VRM vault (PC) to mine with joint forces? The whole idea is that I want to solo mine VRM with total hash-rate of all computers, like own mining pool but without installing MPOS or uNOMP. Your help would be highly appreciated. Thanks
The whole idea is that I want to solo mine VRM with total hash-rate of all computers, like own mining pool but without installing MPOS or uNOMP. Your help would be highly appreciated. Thanks November 11, 2017, 08:21:54 AM
New Binary-Chain ANN is primary for VeriCoin and Verium now: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-binary-chain-vericoin-and-verium-the-first-dual-blockchain-protocol-2385158
November 11, 2017, 01:33:37 AM
I think it still hasn't, it should be an issue may be the growing number of reports of unconfirmed dealings in order to make many of us nervous because the money did not get to the location.
November 10, 2017, 03:48:00 AM
Jump to: