Topic: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex - page 120. (Read 436207 times)

He just not asking a critical question, all his posts have been pretty much trolling.

@dukeneptun

Trolling is when you're asking critical questions regarding the project and don't get answers..  when that happens, you are free to trash the thread with any meme you see fit.

That 6 month range is something you have made up arbitrarily. The VTR dev has announced no such timeline for any feature whatsoever.

For someone with legendary status, you are very childish, do you see any of us trolling purvidz thread?

I am a dev and the point is that we don't post every idea here the second it hits our heads, we don't announce things until we are within at least the six month range of making it happen, that way people don't lag around for MORE THAN SIX MONTHS waiting on people to finish what they started

It's not as easy to just build in a simple torrent client into the software - any developer can do that. But to tie it into a token payment system for sharing files as well as implementing anonymity features makes it about 100 times more difficult.

Any one with a technical / development can relate and knows it takes time. Everybody else just has a royal whinge. That's life in the crypto dev space....

yeah, pretty much gave up on this one a while back.  if it wasn't ready to deploy with at least a hint of the promised features then why post it, lol.

Haha at least we don't have our heads up our asses like some other pure shitcoins.

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Not yet - the Dev is still building the groundwork for the torrent functionality. I wouldn't expect full torrent functionality until the 2nd hard fork around February.

I'm guessing the release in the next week will have a number of "under the hood" changes and improvements.

Has the torrent function actually been worked in yet, as promised?

It dumped because we were expecting the release of the torrent network, but we got 2FA instead.

This time we know the the big release isn't due, so anything we get is gravy

As for price, it's hard to say, we are currently still undervalued in my opinion, we should hit 10K to 12K sat if the first fork is good, if we get any worlds firsts the maybe even higher. Depends on what gets released.

Anyone have speculations for price?

Last update there was a brief buy up and then it dumped to oblivion lol.

I'm not sure how I'm trolling but it's ok, I understand you like many on bitcointalk are programming illiterate and only care about reaping the fruits of roi or using the technology itself rather than the risks you put yourself at by using it. It doesn't matter if the core code has been audited because if I want to use a wallet with two factor, that means I need to run an executable that I can't personally audit myself and that spells trouble in plenty of ways.

The dev not being malicious of the bat isn't a good argument either. How does it not make sense that for example you build up a credible rep over x years simply to then sabotage it. The same thing happened on these forums when a well known escrow sold his account years back and plenty of people then suffered scam losses because of this or did you forget that?


Sure let's talk pure vidz since u guys seem to want to jump on that topic even though it holds no relevance to the dangers of running closed source software intended to manage a financial asset.

How is their website shady? You don't need to download anything. I don't need to download the wallet, invest or register to use their software or product, it's all free. BUT more important, it's a fucking website not a program i'm running on my computer so there's no real risk in me using it to stream content that i'm not downloading hence I don't need to audit shit to know it's safe. There are websites you can use that archive bitcoin talk and since I have invested in pure vidz I definitely keep an eye on that thread quite often like others, an i haven't seen anything deleted. Perhaps there's something i over looked but there's been no major censorship, please if there has been bring it to the other investors attentions, make an unmoderated thread and post the screenshots of these deleted posts so we can all do our due dilligence

if pure vidz releases a wallet and says sorry guys it's closed source don't doubt for a minute i won't call them out on that shit either

but like i said though, continue ducking your head in the sand to protect your investment, just don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining

There are plenty of scams around this forum. But typically if the devs are going to load a virus into their clients, those devs don't tend to wait 2 years. They will pump their project for a few months, at the most, and then try something.

In most cases, devs play around with the pre-mine. Anything over 5% is a red flag. 20% smells of a rat.

If vtorrent devs were to try something now or during the next few hard forks, they would be just about the most patient crypto scammers around, which doesn't fly, IMO.

Plenty of people have looked at the Core client code which is open source and found nothing. Keeping back some unique features for a temporary period is perfectly ok.

You'll have to troll a lot harder because you haven't really got much to play with. But if you're that concerned, report the dev to the mods.

I have nothing but respect for your 'investment' pics.

Thanks for sharing.

Sure i will bring up closed source..developers who do not want their work to be forked and copied are working closed source. There is nothing wrong in it and there are many other coins doing it. IOC for one.

When time is right and the dev is comfortable making it open source he shall. Until then asking for open source and making it sound like its a scam doesnt help.

The dev has been around for 2 years and has been giving updates to the community.  Most of the long term holders and big wallets here are happy with this approach.

instead of bringing up pure vidz which I haven't in any of my posts addressing the issue of being closed source how about you address the fact you're running a shady piece of software that's closed source for pirating copyrighted material and/or other things but not only that it's suppose to manage your money/assets (VTR), lol...

nice red herring


just wanted to point out the double standard here, u have this problem with joy stream but for all you know the next time VTR puts out a closed source release it's coming with a root kit and you'll have a lot more to worry about then shit you just listed... now while this likely won't happen the fact remains that it's a very valid reality given the nature of the project

users should NOT have to blindly trust the dev and run code they can't audit themselves

but it's ok I understand you stick your head in the sand because you're in so deep you've gotta protect your investment, just say it's so and call it for what it is

Hard fork, 12/30/16 2:22 PM  Chain has been speeding up