I step a way for a second and James in his usual machine like manner has addressed most of these issues...
Is this how next spread their adoption? By spamming on other coins thread.
so its ok too have core devs state untrue facts and not have anyone address these things? do you realize that there are a lot of nxters who are also counterparty burners
? so technically we support this project
1 - I'm not a dev
2 - I have no idea if what he's saying is true or not, I'm speaking to him as an expert - you'll notice I was suprised to hear him say that, it was new information to me.
3 - I publicize my personal email on literally every episode including that one, and I didn't recieve a single note in complaint about this. Why complain here, but not to the person who can actually help?
4 - Are you saying he's wrong? NXT does not use Checkpoints currently or in the past?
I really like NXT but honestly you guys smell conspiracy EVERYWHERE and it gets annoying. People are just busy, we don't have fact checkers hell I don't have ANY employees so i'm a little curious what you'd have me do. NXT has an open invitation to do an interview or join us for a host segment on LTB, but you guys don't have many confident speakers I guess as I've had no takers outside of the early and not very compelling interviews with Tai Zen (which ran) and aaron (which didn't).
If you want people to know whats going on with your project, explain it to them in a way they can understand. Otherwise it's confusing to people on the outside and annoying to people on the inside.
I can admit that I made some assumptions that i will clear up:
1) Maybe I wasn't clear, I wasn't referring to you as a dev, but rather someone who understands the environment enough to be objective in analysis which is important to your audience. you are also seen as an authority in this space, you may not admit it but your thorough journalism gives you the authority, and anything that comes out of the show, especially criticism about certain technologies will be taken as truths...just asked the 10s of parrots I keep having to deal with at these meetups...and one thing is common all roads lead to LTB in their some of their arguments sources
2) I could have sworn you knew at least that nxt is very decentralized...a statement such as "nxt is not a solution to the decentralized consensus system" is very inaccurate, thats like comparing NXT to Paypal...Thats a very powerful thing to say that shapes the mind of the public...do you know how many people repeat that same line confidently to me in person? even when I give them the right information...and their sources is usually from that one podcast...
from your sentiment here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5855525 , you were even considering NXT as an option to counterparty at one point in time, why would you consider issue tokens on a platform that was not decentralized?
..My point is, I don't think that statement from peter todd should have been uttered uncontested...it has had damaging and far reaching effects
3) It was not my intent to start anything on this thread...the level of confident ignorance being regurgitated got too much to bear, normally I stay out of these things. I simply came here to check on the progress of counterparty because I am actually invested in it, but instead I find vitriolic attack masked as genuine criticism
4) and like james already retorted Nxt never has or ever will use checkpointing...to compare Nxt algo to peercoin without any actual research and broadcast that on air is unacceptable.
Better yet you state that dev are too busy with their own projects, well thats fine and dandy how about the supposed devs staying out from commenting on unfamiliar technology as opposed to reinforcing untrue notions, or actually asking them if they have looked deeply into Nxt?
?? Devs at least take the time time to do some research before even delving into the topic...I say this because you rush to defend these action as inconsequential but you are intelligent enough to understand the effects of the public authority opinions on general masses
Now its no use crying over spilt milk..and we possibly cannot inform every user of the facts everywhere on the misinformation of nxt...but some Nxters can make a difference here especially with counterparty. I know I certainly can, plus others that have contacted me. Nobody wants to see a > 60000 XCP sell wall below price...I care for XCP more than mastercoin as strange as it sounds...and I want it to realize its full potential..for me the more the merrier...but I did not expect that level of irresponsibility from the devs. I thought they were more objective and thorough than that...We just want informed criticisms if there are to be any... the issue of distribution might be one, but we end up with massive inequalities either way on each and every coin...xcp had a way better distribution mechanism, but we still have inequalities that can wreck havoc on the price in the short term, its the same for bitcoin litecoin, darkcoin etc...the list goes on...
Edit: for those who may not have the time to research and need quick truthful information you can listen to this podcast at the 45 min mark:
http://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/beyond-bitcoin-5-delegates-and-forgers