Pages:
Author

Topic: [Archive] BFL trolling museum - page 91. (Read 69394 times)

legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2012, 01:51:59 AM
lulz reality please - oh wait - don't worry ...
I'm just relaying what the guy told me. I have no personal knowledge of Intel's inner workings.
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
September 30, 2012, 01:46:15 AM
lulz reality please - oh wait - don't worry ...
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2012, 01:44:54 AM
Wait so.. conservative estimate... then planned they to update firmware for faster speeds to be competitive? Doesn't this seem a little bit odd (or even underhanded) to anyone else?
You don't think Intel, AMD, nVidia, etc. do the exact same thing? I talked to a guy a few years back who used to work for Intel, and he said they do exactly this. They stage incremental performance boosts to always have sales. In reality, they have the potential to make a CPU that would blow everything on the market today out of the water, but then they'd have nothing new to sell for years!
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
September 30, 2012, 01:43:01 AM
Wait so.. conservative estimate... then planned they to update firmware for faster speeds to be competitive? Doesn't this seem a little bit odd (or even underhanded) to anyone else?
Actually I'm not exactly sure how a firmware change can gain 50% performance unless the one they were going to release simply ran it at 66% of maximum clock reliable speed ...

A firmware update could have unlocked certain previously unused parts of the chip. Just like a BIOS tweak can unlock the 4th core of certain Phenom processors sold as 3-core.
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
September 30, 2012, 01:37:37 AM
Wait so.. conservative estimate... then planned they to update firmware for faster speeds to be competitive? Doesn't this seem a little bit odd (or even underhanded) to anyone else?
Actually I'm not exactly sure how a firmware change can gain 50% performance unless the one they were going to release simply ran it at 66% of maximum clock reliable speed ...
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
September 30, 2012, 01:36:05 AM
Wait so.. conservative estimate... then planned they to update firmware for faster speeds to be competitive? Doesn't this seem a little bit odd (or even underhanded) to anyone else?

You betcha,if I were you I'd never order a product from them.That'll teach em  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Scattering my bits around the net since 1980
September 30, 2012, 01:25:38 AM
i have a similiar cable for my backup hard drive.
I have one that plugs into the back of itself (pass-thru style) so I can use it with 1 or 2 ports as needed without leaving part of it dangling around.

-- Smoov
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
September 30, 2012, 12:59:41 AM
i have a similiar cable for my backup hard drive.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
September 30, 2012, 12:52:53 AM
Wait so.. conservative estimate... then planned they to update firmware for faster speeds to be competitive? Doesn't this seem a little bit odd (or even underhanded) to anyone else?

PS3 anyone?
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
September 30, 2012, 12:52:21 AM
Wait so.. conservative estimate... then planned they to update firmware for faster speeds to be competitive? Doesn't this seem a little bit odd (or even underhanded) to anyone else?
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2012, 12:25:20 AM
No to USB3 and No wall adapter.


This then?


legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2012, 12:15:03 AM
No to USB3 and No wall adapter.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2012, 12:14:18 AM
They were supposed to ship in September, but they pushed that back to October / November.. so yeah.
I've never heard them say September. All I've ever heard was October, then October/November, and now beginning of November.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
September 30, 2012, 12:04:42 AM
Quote
Our current power consumption targets for our first generation ASIC products are approximately 1 GH per watt

Interesting!

Indeed

20Amp Plugs here we come!
sr. member
Activity: 291
Merit: 250
September 30, 2012, 12:04:02 AM
Hmm so that seems to says they only worked out the expected figures today ... they must be behind in the schedule?

Uh, well yeah,  It's pretty well know they are behind schedule a little.  They were supposed to ship in September, but they pushed that back to October / November.. so yeah.  But, If they ship in Oct. Nov. I really don't mind since I am getting more hash power in my Single Smiley
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2012, 12:03:42 AM
Hmm so that seems to says they only worked out the expected figures today ... they must be behind in the schedule?

Quote
You may notice that these performance figures exceed that of our previously published specification by approximately 50%. Our intention was to eventually over deliver while also being conservative during development. We had planned to reserve this performance increase for a future firmware update and was one method we planned to use to protect our customers in the event of a price war. However, due to the maturity of our development and competition in the market, we felt it was time to clarify what customers will actually receive both in speed and particularly in power consumption so they can properly evaluate their options and make good decisions. We hope it's now easier to understand the closed lip approach of our ASIC line product development.
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
September 30, 2012, 12:02:14 AM
Hmm so that seems to says they only worked out the expected figures today ... they must be behind in the schedule?
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2012, 12:01:10 AM
Quote
Our current power consumption targets for our first generation ASIC products are approximately 1 GH per watt

Interesting!
sr. member
Activity: 291
Merit: 250
Pages:
Jump to: