Bounty campaign managers may be blamed. Many people use their powers in the campaign and do some wrong-doing in counting the stakes for the participants.
For example Unhit bounty.
Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 31. (Read 5969 times)
Most of the bounty managers are engaged in projects very carefully. But some very famous may agree to scam.
In ideal world, the project has to have a good support from the team and managers must always stay updated and check security. If you easily find scammers in the spreadsheets and there is no reply, how can you rely on such project, especially if you invest? 
There are respected and well-known bounty campaign managers who have extensive experience and can evaluate and analyze the future development of the project themselves. After all, it also depends on payment and their own participation in it. But we must understand that bounty managers are also people who can be mistaken or be deceived.
Bounty managers on their work receive payment in BTC. Accordingly, it seems to me that today people need to know about this. Would you check the project if you still received your reward at BTC? I think that there is no motivation.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
On a very serious note, even though the terms and condition on many Bounty campaigns state expressly about the possibilities of future change, this will not be honestly justified if during token distribution, Bounty managers are play pranks with this, at the detriment of the energy, time and money bounty hunters have invested to campaign for such bounty project.
Scammers blaming scammers? It is true that it is very sad to participate in a fake project and the first responsibles are the managers, but to the selection of a project it is necessary to study it well. I don't imagine participating 10 weeks in a signature campaign and being scammed in the end. Something that bothers much more is to receive your payment and know that all hunters are selling their tokens at a very low price. There is a lot of scam in both hunters and mannager, but getting carried away by emotions is not the best solution.
I do not participate in any ICO. There's too much fraud. Even in good ICO token price still drops due to the current state of the market.
It seems to me that the blame for the bad ICO lies not on the "bounty hunters", but on the founder of this ICO. After all, the "bounty hunter" can not know for sure whether it is a good or bad project. Many scammers are very nice and competently present the idea of their project, so that as many people as possible believe them and invest in them. Therefore, everything is relative and who is right and who is to blame is not up to us.
actually there's nothing to blame. not the manager , not you. because it is always the different situations. like they said, sometimes the bounty manager because he/she just disappear afyer the campaign and not left any token for you. and spmetimes for us that we can't think carefully before enter in this campaign. we need to be think carefuy im order to not deceive so there's no one to blame .
If they from the very beginning know that the company is not going to pay anything to investors, then of course they can be blamed for this
when you enter into long-term projects patience is important to notice changes in time and make a profit otherwise you can miss the moment when you need to act
I am sure that most of the managers are also deceived by the scam project teams and would not cheat the users of the forum. But I think that some guess about cheating, but silent for the money.
So if some bounty managers are able to select good bounties which end successfully, then why cant the others do same and always bring us scam projects. The best option is to join AmaZix or bountyhive bounties
I don't think so because the bounty managers might have been scammed just like you have been. These days i suggest to this noble community and its members to join bounty campaigns managed by credible people in this forum and also before we partake in any bounty campaign let's make all the necessary researches.
The scam is indeed unsettling. It's not easy for bounty managers to predict a Scam, but they also have to be responsible for the work that is offered.
Usually no, because they are the victims too. But situation with needmoney says, that everything is possible
At the end of the day, a bounty manager is just another bounty hunter most times, since they work for tokens and do not have better chances.
The fault lies entirely with the project team, the bounty manager can not be responsible for cheating the project team. Bounty manager just does his job.You're right. A bounty manager is a hired worker who gets paid for his work. But the project managers are responsible for the success or failure of the project. If the project is scam the bounty manager also receives nothing, just like bounty hunters.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
On general, I don't see a reason why managers would really be blamed if a certain project turn out to be a scam yet hes just being hired up to manage when it comes to marketing and also he do depend on project given out salary too then how he would like such thing? Unless if the manager is part of the team then its already understandable that it is indeed already a scheme on the very first place but for those experienced managers or known on this forum its not right for them to be blamed.
It is not easy for a bounty manager to detect scam in the beginning of a project. Sometimes bounty manager later discover that the project they manage is a big scam then they have no other choice than to apologize to the bounty hunters. In a nutshell, I don't think bounty managers should be blamed because most of them are unaware that the project they manage is scam.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Bounty managers should not be blamed for the demise of a project. In most cases bounty management are outsourced to individuals or firms who don't have any clue of the scam intension to be perpetuated by the team. They were as gullible as the bounty hunters and should not be blamed, though they ought to be more careful in choosing projects so as to preserve their reputation.
Jump to: