So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
i thknk thaf they of cohrseshare some responsibility, bit i really dlu t that thdy decide evrything, sk i do not know 
Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 26. (Read 5954 times)
You cant just blame the bounty manager because other Ico projects just hire a bounty manager and negotiate how their payments is. And that bounty manager will review his project to manage , even though he reads the whitepaper and saw how promising the project is ,bounty manager has no idea if that project will going to be scam in the near future because at the end of the day only ico project has the power to become legit or become a scam. Unless the ico project produce a bounty manager of their own then it should be blame.
Bounty managers are not the problem, but some time they can be part of the whole corrupt system. Bounty managers have influence over the community and if they make a mistake, usually the bounty hunters are paying the price.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Its the ICO team who should be blame for a scam. managers were only hired to manage spreadsheet and act as bridge from the hunters the ICO team itself.
I fully agree and also believe that only the ICO team of the project is guilty. and bounty hunters and managers are all victims of this team's deception.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Hunter are not to be blamed because sometimes when we get involved in the project, the project will be running fine and the bounty manager will be couraging the hunters to get more involved in the work. But after raising some amount of money you will not found anybody to talk to and hunter will be complaining. So my advice is to check well first and remove your mind in some project that they will not pay you.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Bounty managers are not responsible for the general policy of the project, they are just doing the job they were hired for. So I don't think they should be blamed for the project to become a scam - they can do nothing about that.
It also depends on how much money they are getting paid for doing their tasks, most of the times they are dumping the tokens that they get and that is the reason of a dump
Although the real essence of bounty is to promote and enhance the success of an ICO but the result us the other way round, mist of the blame should be attributed to the team and not the bounty manager because in most cases they are also paid with the coin or tokenn of the project of which in the case of the unexpected he will also suffer the loss.
Of course they should blame. Managers should check at least the team before starting a bounty campaign. And then they will pick up the scam and advertise it on the forum.
I believe that bounty managers can also be blamed. They must be firm with their decisions and also they need to verify the legitimacy of a project. In this way many investors can avoid scams since almost of the promotion came from campaigns.
If the bounty manager is reputed to be offering bounties that ends up being scam like needmoney then I think he is to be blamed but if it is a one-off thing he should be pardoned. No one gets it 100percent right. Bounty hunters too should endeavour to do research.
We can't blame Bounty Managers although they have their shortcomings of not carefully choosing a good bounty campaign. They are just like us who take the job of managing the companies bounty campaign. I mean they did not purposely publish an scam ICO even them they don't know if the company will scam us. The one to blame here is the team who runs their ICO. We (bounty hunters) and bounty managers are all just victims here.
It's our all obligation to screen properly which is a legitimate ICO bounty managers also the same of us who is working for the project but since he still have an obligation. For me I try to follow certain team include the manager which show good results from their previous projects.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Bounty managers are just a hired personnel that follow the rules given to them by the project devs. So why should they be blamed for the things they could not predict from the start? And if the bounty manager was not aware of the events? I would like to note that it's very difficult to be an exemplary bounty manager. At the same time, really honest guys feel sorry for their reputation - they do not cooperate with scammers. We draw a conclusion: it is possible to think about this a lot, but it is impossible to adjust everything to one standards. Just be careful, thank you!
I saw this bounty and it was very tempting and attractive. Went ahead to do some checks about it and I wasn't satisfied so I left it. I think all the blames shouldn't be apportioned on bounty managers alone. Bountyhunters too have a share in the blame for not doing proper research before diving into it.
It is not fault of the bounty managers since they are jusr paid to make bounty thread, the managers dont hold what the ceo or the team thinks. So it is not fault of the bounty managers.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I think holding and being a manager of a project is not easy, because managing a project must be thorough and diligent, so don't play blame on the manager. because sometimes things like this are not liked or desired by them
the bounty manager should choose ico carefully. before becoming a bounty manager, he should have learned more to know the characteristics of a scam ico. or, keep communicating with the ICO team, so that the bounty manager can anticipate if the ICO looks suspicious.
Maybe not completely, but they have some responsibility, here in altcoin subforum is a post about the manager needmoney, who has a lot of ICOs under his administration and there are several people in that post accusing him of being a scammer, I don't know what to think about it, because I haven't dealt with him directly, but I think he should be more careful with his reputation, since people put their trust, time and effort in their ICOs because it was supposedly recommended.
Jump to: