Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 29. (Read 5969 times)
If a bounty manager is doing his job with responsibility like keep updating bounty thread/tg group with latest news concerning bounty,calculate stakes accurately and most importantly take note of complaints and answer them politely then it's not always their fault if ICO turned out to be a scam.
It's not my intention to defend myself. As a person who focuses on bounty, I am very disappointed if such things happen. And for me, conditions like this can not be blamed bounty hunters even though the manager has apologized. Because between the manager with bounty hunters are both aiming for profit.
For me bounty managers should not be blamed if the project is scam.Managers don't want scam also because if they manage a scam project they don't receive their payments too.No one like to exert all efforts and get nothing in the end.
We cannot blame the bounty manager because most of them cant be awared of the plan of the developer scamming people. At the same some will be blamed for not checking and investigate the company very well.
Bounty manager can be blamed at times because they dont do proper research about the project before they accept the bounty job.
No we can't blame bounty managers because like us they don't know also if the project is a scam so we must be responsible in selecting what signature campaigns we want to join in.
really we can not blame the manager bounty because he's trying his best to succeed the bounty program in the kelolanya it's just that he also can not predict that the project failed or scam as well when we as bouty hunter want to participate in bounty program
No we can't blame bounty managers because like us they don't know also if the project is a scam so we must be responsible in selecting what signature campaigns we want to join in.
No , We should not blame on bounty for any scam project .The manager have no knowledge about the scam project.Just think if investor have no idea a project is a scam project who invest his money after deep research how manager knows it. The manager just do his duty.
There are those bounty managers that already got the neg for accepting scam project. Browse the forum a little more and you will know who they are. They got to be blame partly, they should have done a little research because they are here in the forum for a long time and they can sense if that project is scam or not.
No , We should not blame on bounty for any scam project .The manager have no knowledge about the scam project.Just think if investor have no idea a project is a scam project who invest his money after deep research how manager knows it. The manager just do his duty.
I think it's our problem not from the manager or even his followers. in this case do not blame each other with a lot of negative news for ICO which is indeed a lot of fraud, we should avoid it but various ways have been done and indeed this could destroy the image of crypto itself, investors will increasingly not believe then than that know the problem since the beginning then we can argue well too.
The failure of the bounty not the fault of the bounty manager because they also could not predict the success of a bounty but that failure can be minimized with our follow the project on hold bounty manager who's have good experienced but that does not mean the project will always succeed 100% because in the world of crypto nothing is impossible.
This is what I have noticed with many of the bounties here:
1. Even after the official end date of the bounty, the bounty manager doesn't confirm whether the signatures can be removed or the FB/Twitter posts can be stopped. And in some cases, the bounty manager announces that the bounty is still on after not communicating for 1 month after the official end date (see Selfllery bounty).
2. Spreadsheets are not updated on time with stake calculation
3. Duplicate records are not removed.
4. Final stake calculation not done on time.
5. Tokens are not distributed on time.
1. Even after the official end date of the bounty, the bounty manager doesn't confirm whether the signatures can be removed or the FB/Twitter posts can be stopped. And in some cases, the bounty manager announces that the bounty is still on after not communicating for 1 month after the official end date (see Selfllery bounty).
2. Spreadsheets are not updated on time with stake calculation
3. Duplicate records are not removed.
4. Final stake calculation not done on time.
5. Tokens are not distributed on time.
It depends on the situation because if the manager do his or her job and the result is worthless
I think we should accept that but if he or she make a fraud resulting to that outcome therefore she is blamed for that.
I think we should accept that but if he or she make a fraud resulting to that outcome therefore she is blamed for that.
No, because the one who has a big role in the ICO election is, yourself. Managers only facilitate, and they may also conspire with a scam. So you need to be more careful in choosing ICO and also tighten in the investigation of the ICO list you want to follow.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
50/50, In my opinion, Bounty Manager has not really review the project that is why ended into a Scam. If the BM set a procedures before accepting an ICO then he will determined which is a Scam. But you can't blame the BM at all time, if you blame the BM then blame yourself also because you are part of the project and you are one of the Participant who is promoting a Scam project in one word your an accessories in that Scam project. You have to do your part also as a bounty hunter. You must practice also how to determine a potential ICO. Don't put the blame to anyone,just move on.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Bounty managers should never be blamed. They're the ones who will be paid first before us so when the campaign fails to pay the bounty participant, then it is more likely that bounty campaign manager will not be paid as well. Never blame the manager because he/she is doing their assigned task to them.
I believe that managers are not to blame. they may not be aware of what the creators of the project intended
Some managers can't do their jobs correctly, they need to have the skill to be on time with the stakes. In my opinion the bonus manager is also a victim like bounty hunters. They can not know if the ICO is a scam or not.
So do not blame them
So do not blame them
true, sometimes the manager project also receives a payment with the token made by the project and paid after the project is completed, and if the project is a scam, the project manager will not get paid either
Sometimes it's the bounty managers are to be blame by this. Although there were cases that bounty managers are not the person to be blame. For example, the team promises money but they didn't pay. That's not a managers fault. But, if the manager is consenting the acts of a scam ico. That's a clear manager fault.
both the bounty managers and the bounty hunters are to be blamed. The bounty managers fail to do their task and fall a sufferer also some hunters just leap into a bounty and start collaborating with out the total expertise of what the ICO is all about. Blame the both parties worried
Jump to: