So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I think we can't blame bounty manager if the ICO is scammed, for me its better to research or to study the ICO before I join the campaign, First i check the team if they have pictures or link in social media or other site, 2nd check their product, software or application and for me the last I check their token address if the token is the list in the etherscan, some of ICO list in the etherscan, but others not. 
Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 37. (Read 5954 times)
If a bounty manager think he can be smart enough to shift the blame of failed ICOs to bounty hunters let him continue to patronize fake ICOs one day it will get down on him when He will publish a bounty and no bounty hunter will participate in His project.
We can't blame Bounty Managers although they have their shortcomings of not carefully choosing a good bounty campaign. They are just like us who take the job of managing the companies bounty campaign. I mean they did not purposely publish an scam ICO even them they don't know if the company will scam us. The one to blame here is the team who runs their ICO. We (bounty hunters) and bounty managers are all just victims here.
I agree with you 
so there is no point us to blame others.
This is a frequent status in the recent times, there are many ICO projects scam investors. I was also one of the victims of UCHIT. For this issue, I think it is difficult to answer because we do not know the manager's information and can't assert that his words are true or false. It is possible that he knows the true paths of the project, but because of greed he will continue to deceive people. However, I think that most of the famous managers will not have such negative actions. We should not blame the managers if they really do not know the scam of the deception activities of the team
It is the responsibilty of everyone - both managers and participants. If the manager in the process of Bounty campaign make the adverticement that the project is scam or do something in order to help Bounty Hunters - he or she should not be blamed. But in case Bounty manager made an adverticement that the project is scam, but Bounty Hunters go on to make the reports and blame the manager or the destiny they are also should be blamed that were not attentive. So it depends on the situation.
I really don't know why sometimes bounty campaign participants do blame the campaign managers. It sometimes depends on the project devs and also I think the managers too can be blamed because they come with them to scam us.
No one should be accused, you voluntarily participate in the bounty, blame yourself that you could not see the Scam project
It cant be help, there are some unprofessional bounty manager who just accept work without even reviewing it then it would turn as a scam. The unprofessional bounty managers only wants the payment given to them they will not think of what will happen in the future thus many people are getting scammed by it.
We can't blamed bounty managers since their job is just to manage the bounty thread and how to distributed the allocated budget for one project. But its their responsibility to update bounty participant whats going on in the project they are supporting.
We can't blame Bounty Managers although they have their shortcomings of not carefully choosing a good bounty campaign. They are just like us who take the job of managing the companies bounty campaign. I mean they did not purposely publish an scam ICO even them they don't know if the company will scam us. The one to blame here is the team who runs their ICO. We (bounty hunters) and bounty managers are all just victims here.
I agree with you
They are to be blame based on my own perspective because they have the right and every reason to research about the project before its accepted by them.
Nope but they should mentioned that they are just bounty manager for respective ico from starting and there is nothing to worry.popular bounty manager often also act as escrower for respective token which is also good way .so there is nothing to blame bounty manager for it as fund are paid through team.
It wont be easy for them to know if its scam or not, so cant blame them but at the sane time some bounty manager needs to be blame for not doing proper investigation about the project before accepting it just because they want to receive free money.
Sometimes they go hand in hand with the project and use us and after that scam us. This is really disgusting but I think its not always that they have to be blamed.
This is not the fault of full bounty managers, it is not easy for them to predict fraud, they also very often lose a lot of money and time. Participants in the prize campaign themselves must carefully choose the right potential project to participate. But the bonus manager is also responsible for contacting ICO for proper resolution.
Not entirely but I believe if most of them have asked the relevant questions and done the necessary research before accepting to work for some ICOs, bounty hunters wouldn't have been hurt as much. Although they are some who above perfected the art of scam that you wouldn't be able to smell anything even if you did.
Managers are not like us. They are to blame that the project has not collected enough of a particular amount.
How would they even know if it's a scam or not. They just applied to get a "salary" in the form of coins, I bet he doesn't even know the team of devs personally so how would he get a single clue..
So ones again we have been defrauded by another ICO known as Uchit. Presently individuals have begun down-pouring abuse and reviles on the abundance chief that he has driven them to be defrauded. Regardless of the various statements of regret from the administrator, abundance seekers don't appear to get it. Presently my inquiry is, do you figure abundance seekers must be faulted when we are defrauded on the grounds that they knew what the ICO was doing, even from the earliest starting point?
Yes, I think that the Manager is to blame. because he's in charge of marketing.
Jump to: