Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 40. (Read 5954 times)
The task of a bounty manager is to manage the project and if the project was fail,, it's not the bounty Manager's fault because they are just doing their jobs and they don't know if the ICO scam or not....they wanted also to make money... to the participants should be careful to choose the right potential project to participate,..
If they already know from the beginning, if the ico is held just to cheat, should be blamed! because it is a criminal act, stealing the money of investors and deceiving the bounty hunters...
At first choose the right bounty managers that is being trusted like Sylon and Blockeye they are well known good bounty managers and i can say that they will not cheated us and they assured that the project are not scam, because as i observed there are lots of scammers now using ICO to get money from the investors, so we have to be alert.
I think most of the bounty managers comes from the ranks of bounty hunters. Finding ways to earn also. They are not really connected directed to the project and can not also predict that the project would turn out as scams.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Yes,we should also blame the manager why the project is scam,we know that a manager's job is very difficult but he/she must first ensure that the project is not a scam before accepting it,and the first thing he need to do is review the project and check the website if it is legit.and not just his profit he always think as well as the bounty hunters working on him.
Like us the bounty managers are just working too and just like us they can't also easily determine wether this campaign is legit or just another scam project. If there was anyone to blame I think it is ourselves because we are the one who participated in it and the bounty managers did not force us to join. It is our duty to check things out first if this campaign is legit or not. Let's not put so much pressure to the bounty managers.
We should not blame the bounty managers especially if they are not part of the team, bounty managers are also like us as a bounty hunters that they are hoping for a payout after the ICO is finish but it just turnout into scam, bounty managers are also given a negative trust from handling bounty program of a scam ICO which at first they don't have any idea that it is a scam and i think is not right, this forum must have a legal department to handle this kind is situation.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I don't think bounty managers are to be blamed. Before participating in a bounty program or ICO, bounty hunters are required to do some kind of research before joining any bounty.
I do not think that bounty manager is the one who blames anything on the project, they wanted to earn money also, but in the other side, the bounty manager will study first the project. If there are need to blame only the developers and the project team.
Bounty manager is does not have any responsibility for bounty program that not paying, they already try to do better for bounty hunter. Its difficult to know which kind of bounty will not paying, and i take this risk because actually all kind of job has risk. I been joined signature campaign in more than 1 month but that project did not paying, and i can not do anything, just take the risk and dont use bounty for main job and we should have others job like trading.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
The managers are partially to be blamed because they let themselves to be used by a scam ICO. They didn’t made sure what they get into. Managing a bounty campaign is not an easy task and it can ruin their reputation. Managing an ICO has two outcome either to make you or break you as a person.They cannot blame the bounty hunters if they do that because it is not easy for them too.
Bounty managers should not be blamed when the bounty program that he has been taking care of is a scam because bounty managers are just doing their job , and they are also recruited for that work. The blames should be the team of the ICO , developers , founders and their marketing strategies. They should be the one to blame why their project fails. And also the bounty hunters are not to blame because they only want to have tokens for their work.
Yes bounty manager should be blamed when the project is scam. Because for sure if he already knew it was a scam he shouldn't continue it. But he chose to continue and make people stupid.
In my own opinion. Yes bounty manager should blame here because he is the one who is responsible for the project that participants have been participating. So he should handle this kind of problem.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
For some reasons, yes bounty manager can be blamed of what happened. Because their participants didn't meet the expectation for that project. And also bounty manager brings the name of that ICO project. Recently, it is bounty managers who are to blame, conduct fraudulent projects, start a table with a bunch of fake accounts, intentionally change your wallets in the tables to their own.
I dont think any bounty manager can change account address of participants to his own and go free, not on this forum if you have evidence. You can report that to the forum administrator with evidence and am sure you it will be properly handled. 
Recently, it is bounty managers who are to blame, conduct fraudulent projects, start a table with a bunch of fake accounts, intentionally change your wallets in the tables to their own.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I guess we can't blame the bounty manager if they are also not paid by the team it is alsi frustrating that they were not paid for their hardwork.
But when the bounty manager was paid by the manager maybe that's the time we can blame the bounty manager because they lead us to the wrong and scam projects.
bounty supervisor is also someone who is relied on to control bounty and he does now not recognize bounty is a rip-off or not (besides bounty manager who came from the crew) so I suppose bounty manager who isn't a part of the group need to not we blame
Bounty managers are not to be blamed if a project turns out to be a scam more especially when its he or she is not from the team its self they only perform their jobs as managers and nothing more
Jump to: