Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 38. (Read 5969 times)
Nope because they can't say whether a project is a scam or not, ofcoarse some of them we're paid before starting, but there are few bounty managers accepting offers even though its very obvious scam, they do it only for money. But we can't blame all the bounty managers because they're not a bot they can make mistakes as well.
It is not easy for Bounty managers to predict scam. It is better to talk to Bounty manager ad make a solution by which you can contact team of ICO , if it is scam then take help of bounty manager and raise voice against ICO team.
Recently, our forum has become very much a scam, why bounty managers do not analyze projects? I heard that for their work they get a reward in BTC and hunters get in tokens. It is not right. Those who get into the BTC should be held accountable.
I deem dividend administrators shouldn't be castigate, how they discriminate, whether an ICO is a goldbrick or not. Bounty hunters chalk up and got any, they chalk up to explore adapted previously participating in an ICO.
I was not totally support the notion that bounty managers whenever an ICO turned out to be scam. Most of them not have an idea that the project will be a failure because if they know, they would not get involved reason being that they will also share part of the loss.
On the manager is not a little responsibility. This person is directly responsible for the calculation of rates. And as an indirect responsibility for payments.
Not really! We can't outrightly blame Bounty Managers. Although they have their shortcomings of not carefully choosing a good bounty campaign. They are just like the hunters who take the job of managing the companies bounty campaign. The ones to blamed here is the team who runs the ICO. We (bounty hunters) and bounty managers are all just victims here.
I think we have to start looking at ourselves at some point. I will admit here that I always liked signature campaigns ever since I joined them here on bitcointalk. For most that I started, I also started using them myself. Which is why I opted for services rather than tokens until recently, wanting to try to see what all the fuss about tokens are about. I am on my second token campaign.
But what I saw was so few of the fellow participants really liked their campaigns or knew much about it. Everybody asked "when distribution" and "when listing" when what is important is "when can we use the tokens?"
ICOs saw this as treated us like the way we have asked to be treated.
These days i have been seeing bounty managers of scam projects getting red trust. Those who even report after the scam alert has been published on the thread also earn red. I think this is a good initiative
I think shouldn't blame for them. Most of bounty hunters also want to that ICo successful. They have learned, found a lot of it.
But with Ico, they are also scam. There are nothing predict. If you don't want to be scamed, let's take knowledge yourself. It's help limit scam.
But with Ico, they are also scam. There are nothing predict. If you don't want to be scamed, let's take knowledge yourself. It's help limit scam.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
The bounty manager is only an intermediary, nor does he know whether ico will succeed or not. And when ico fails and does not pay, it's not the fault of the bounty manager entirely.
I believe that the leaders of plenty are not to blame for failure. And they are like ordinary workers doing their jobs.
I do not think they are to be blamed when an ICO fails. Although bounty managers may have a direct communication with the project but there is a huge possibility that the managers doesn’t or will not know that it is a scam unless the manager is directly involved with the project.
yes we can not blame the bounty manager for granted. we must see where the project fails, because the bounty manager is only concerned with the campaign alone, marketing issues and other sales strategy team problems.which we need to know, these are all risks of bounty hunter, we must realize that, all things can happen.
I do not think that they can know for sure whether the project will be a scam or not. They, too, can be deceived, like the participants of the campaigns.
In some cases they are to blame, some are heartless and cheatful, they look for a way to rob and steal in all ways, and kudi to those who do their work the way they should
I do not think they are to be blamed when an ICO fails. Although bounty managers may have a direct communication with the project but there is a huge possibility that the managers doesn’t or will not know that it is a scam unless the manager is directly involved with the project.
I think both the bounty manager and the participants share the blame, For the bounty manager, you konw quite well that your reputation depends on the performance of the coin and all that, it's therefore only fair to authenticate the project before being a part of it, The hunters on the other hand need to be cautious on the projects they are a part of and ensure they are wrth taking part in
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
No, you can't blame the Bounty Managers. They are same as us. They can't detect which ICO is not a scam.
So, the only person you can blame is the team project.
remember, if a scam project is not a BM fault
Bounty manager role is to manage bounty work and allot the stakes to each participant as per their work done and send final sheet to the company for distribution and after that he has no role. If the company don't distribute as per their words then there is no fault of a manager as he done his job.
it's obviously wrong bounty manager if he knows if the project is a scam and continue to market it and has many bounty managers who get redtrust because of it.
but what makes me sad is the increasingly rampant ICO scam and the harder it is to choose a quality ICO. even 4 of 7 ICO projects that I follow end up with a scam or fail. it makes the spirit of the bounty hunter down
but what makes me sad is the increasingly rampant ICO scam and the harder it is to choose a quality ICO. even 4 of 7 ICO projects that I follow end up with a scam or fail. it makes the spirit of the bounty hunter down
Everything depends on the situation, sometimes the bounty managers are really to blame, but most often the project itself is to blame. To understand who is to blame for each specific situation, one must carefully understand this situation.
Jump to: