Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 42. (Read 5954 times)
for me bounty manager shouldn't be blame on this if the bm are still active and approaching every single question on what happened on the project you should be more precising on this.. because this bm is also like bounty hunters that want to earn some profit also. you should curse the team who really actually operating the ICO. if that is happened you will learn to be more careful on what project will you joined next..
They are not to be blamed but for me, they should've done their research before accepting a bounty project. This only not reflects just the bounty managers but as for bounty hunters as well. We should be wary about the bounties that we are involved with.
This is a very serious question which the answer could be yes and at the same time could be no. Firstly, the bounty campaign manager could not be part of the team at all from the start but just a contract employee with them, which doesn't even require meeting in person (physically). The Team would give the bounty manager the project info and if he/she thinks the project is okay, he would agree to manage the bounty campaign for them. In this case, the bounty manager shouldn't be blamed but if otherwise, he/she should be held responsible for that. #justmyopinion
Managers should held responsible for a certain ICO project cause there are some bounty hunters idolized bounty managers or happy to follow their campaign. Also for hunters they need to screen properly certain projects search their products and the team behind the project.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Sometimes it's not easy for bounty managers to know which of the ICOs they are managing are scams, however if they had done a proper check up before accepting the ICO to manage they wouldn't have found themselves in this blame game.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
we should not be able to blame anyone in this case because we also know the risks we will get in doing that fraud, low price and require patience in a long time
I believe that blaming bounty managers that the project turned out to be a scam is unfair. They, like bounty hunters, do their work, even more than hunters, they also suffer from it. After all, they as well as hunters hope to pay for their work - and the result is one for all. So once again, do not blame the managers.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
it seems like bounty managers never know that the bounty under their supervision is a scam, it's because of the difficulty of seeing if they're good or not. I myself never blame the manager who led it all. obviously this is the fault of the project developers, a manager only has the task to promote it, and choose it of course, but as I said at the beginning. it is very difficult to choose ico which is not ending scam at the moment ..
I do not think that the managers of bounty campaigns are to blame for the fact that the project was a Scam. Perhaps the Manager was given enough time and resources was devoted to the selection of the bounty campaigns. But often managers also participate in the bounty campaign, wear a signature and also become a victim of deception. Bounty participants and managers must be on the same side.
I don't think so there are so many bounty campaigns and bounty managers so you guys need to find out good bounty campaign to join to make sure that you're not going to be scammed so if you guys scammed by bounty campaign or ICO project so that mean it's your mistake not bounty manager so there are no way that you guys should blame for bounty manager .
Typically, managers are not relevant to the project. They also work for money. It is necessary to blame only the developers and the project team
I think some should be blamed and others should not. There are some bounty managers who genuinely have no link with the team so they are also scammed just like the hunters. On the other hand, there are some who always manage bounties that always end up being a scam. Such people must be blamed and even given red trust
sometimes managers are very careless about many trying to deceive bounty members
Some scam bounties are easily detected bounty managers whereas others escape them. Not all unsuccessful projects are scam, some result unsuccessful due to reasons such as inexperienced team members who are not capable to carry the project to success.
no bounty manager are not to blame at all cost. what i m seeing is that some of the project that are coming into this forum are mostly scam and the bounty manager's aren't in the right position to know the right project.
No they are not the one to be blamed he is not part of the team just working and the task of manager is not easy.
That Is A Tough Question. Obviously, Someone Needs To Take The Blame. I'm Very Emotional So I Think A Bounty Manager As A Good Of A Scapegoat As Any.
I Mean, Hunters Have To Do Some Sorta Research Before They Join An ICO. If They Weren't Able To Recognize A Scam, They Are Also At Fault. I Dunno, It's Real Complex.
I Mean, Hunters Have To Do Some Sorta Research Before They Join An ICO. If They Weren't Able To Recognize A Scam, They Are Also At Fault. I Dunno, It's Real Complex.
Nowadays, some of the bounty managers have a tendency to over-commit, and as a result they are not able to successfully manage the projects. The spreadsheets are not being updated on time, and they are not being able to identify the scammers.
Sometimes it's worth it, because you can immediately see that the project is a scam. But many managers take the pay immediately, so they do not care which company to lead
You can not blame the Manager-as they also choose projects to pay for their work . Besides, if he apologized , not missing , then why insult and criticize . This is part of our earnings-from fraudulent projects no one is insured
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Like us bounty hunters or participants, bounty managers are also having a hard time to know if a bounty campaign is a scam or not, it's either lack of research or just bad luck. It doesn't mean that if the bounty is scam it's the bounty manager's fault. Given that kind of situation that the bounty manager already apologize you should have the courage to face it and move on, I'm sure that Uchit didn't want such things to happen. Also a bounty campaign is a large project and it's not just the bounty manager to be blames their are people behind it that's responsible for such scam so why blame the campaign manager right?
Jump to: