The bounty hunters are innocent and indignant that many of these projects themselves are scams.
Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 43. (Read 5954 times)
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
According to my own personal experience, it is not always the manager to blame. Somtimes it is about the investors, sometines it is about the team of the campaign and somtimes about the manager. There are cases that manager is not part of the team so the manager is just a puppet of the team and if the team leaves the campaign , manager get scammed also.
"Not Fully False to Bounty Managers"
because Bounty Manager is also from a third party, aka almost the same as the bounty hunter, Bounty manager can not predict the ICO can be successful or not, because it depends from the initial sale of the token, if the token not sold in softcap then certainly the ICO failed. and Bounty Manager can not be blamed because the development team was equally failed.
my experience follow Hotachy (Bounty Manager) for I AM HERO project, his project fails continuously do i have to blame Hotachy?
obviously not, his project also fails to blame his manager's time.
because Bounty Manager is also from a third party, aka almost the same as the bounty hunter, Bounty manager can not predict the ICO can be successful or not, because it depends from the initial sale of the token, if the token not sold in softcap then certainly the ICO failed. and Bounty Manager can not be blamed because the development team was equally failed.
my experience follow Hotachy (Bounty Manager) for I AM HERO project, his project fails continuously do i have to blame Hotachy?
obviously not, his project also fails to blame his manager's time.
If a bounty manager is doing his job with responsibility like keep updating bounty thread/tg group with latest news concerning bounty,calculate stakes accurately and most importantly take note of complaints and answer them politely then it's not always their fault if ICO turned out to be a scam.
Blame the bounty manager to what end?
Bounty manager is just like us bounty hunters, the only difference is that the BH is hired by the project ICO and we are "hired " by the bounty manager.
If you want to shift blame to the Bm, you could as well blame the bhounters:)
Bounty manager is just like us bounty hunters, the only difference is that the BH is hired by the project ICO and we are "hired " by the bounty manager.
If you want to shift blame to the Bm, you could as well blame the bhounters:)
We can blame the bounty managers but they are just here to create the community for the ico. They are getting paid to do that job. Also, they don't really know whether a certain project will turn into scam. But i think even if we blame the bounty manager, we can do nothing about it since he has no control over that project. A bounty manager is like an advertising firm working for a client. If the client's product is not working as advertised, it is really not the fault of the advertiser, but we can blame them for the untruthful advertisement.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I think we can blame everything to the bounty manager. They also work for the ICO Team just like us. So if we have been scammed, they also are victims of the scammed ICO. But of course, because selecting a scammed ICO, the Bounty Manager’s reputation might also be affected.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I think it's not a bounty manager's fault if the project he controls is going to be a scam. His job is to work well with the bounty campaign not the ICO nor should hunters blame for the incident. It is the ICO itself and the whole team are the one to explain what happened. Next time do some research before joining an ICO.
They can't be blame for everything cos they don't actually the ico that will be a scam.
I believe that as soon as the Manager suspected something was wrong he should warn all those involved in the bounty. He is also to blame when he takes the project and does not check it. We are also people and do not want to waste time just like that.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Bounty hunters are to be blamed for getting scammed but it's the scammers that are to be blamed for hurting all those people. So I say it's just fair he receive all those insults. I also say that we imprison them.
I don't understand how the bounty manager made choices when accepting the bounty task. Have they chosen it? I have not played the role of a bounty manager, so I have not blamed the bounty manager!
I do not think they are to be blamed when an ICO fails. Although, there are lots of fraudulent Bounty managers which I know of, but bounty managers are mostly not the cause of the failure of some ICO projects. But, I think they have the right to know whether an ICO is going to fail or not, or rather a scam since they have a direct communication with the team and advisors.
No one blamed on the condition. to blame is that by deliberately creating a bounty with the aim of the scam. Bounty manager no idea about this. so I think to blame it completely to the bounty manager also is not good. He's also looking for results from the bounty that he's working on.
I don’t think bounty managers are to be blamed when the project won’t turn out the way you expexted or it becomes a scam. Although bounty managers may have a direct communication with the project but there is a huge possibility that the managers doesn’t or will not know that it is a scam unless the manager is directly involved with the project. So with that, i think it is best to give them the benefit of a doubt and at the same time, not curse them.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
In my opinion, they have to be blame partially I think because they must ensure whether an ICO is a scam or not. As bounty managers, they have direct communication to the dev team in order to maintain its platform. I should see on how dev team works if they can maintain it or not before inviting forum members to participate in bounty campaign.
Due to part of scammed project, everyone blaming bounty managers. But there is no reason to blame bounty managers because if any project is scam or they do not pay rewards, then for this the owners of projects are totally responsible.
Because bounty managers do not have any type of control on project, they are here only do their job of check and manage bounty works of bounty hunters and always do that things, which is tells by the project owners or management. So the whole sole responsibility of scammed project are of project owners. And never blame bounty managers.
Because bounty managers do not have any type of control on project, they are here only do their job of check and manage bounty works of bounty hunters and always do that things, which is tells by the project owners or management. So the whole sole responsibility of scammed project are of project owners. And never blame bounty managers.
Sometimes it's worth it, because you can immediately see that the project is a scam. But many managers take the pay immediately, so they do not care which company to lead
The rules of reward for signing activities are different. The length of time is different. First, how much time do you need to get paid? The question is on the individual. The reason for being cheated is that you do not know enough about the authenticity of the project.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
It shall be because I think it will be the responsibility of the managers to ensure that the campaigns that they are handling are not scam because their reputations is at stake that once they failed to handle it properly to become a success then the trust of the hunters to them will surely gone. I don't think so that you will still join his campaign again but for sure you will starting to avoid that bounty manager by not joining their campaign anymore.
Jump to: