Although currently there are many project developers who choose to do ieo, but that is not a reason to say if ico will die, because I think not all project developers who like to sell using the ieo system because the amount of big funds that must be spent by the developer to sell ieo in exchanger market, so with so many projects that until now use ico and I think there are still many of the successful ico projects today, but of course investors should be more careful in choosing a project for them to invest so that they are not trapped in the ico or ieo scam.
Agree that ICOs are still appearing in some projects at this time when not all projects are able to develop and are eligible to follow the IEO trend because the level of competition in this trend is so high, exchanges can only select the best and most suitable projects for their users and investors. The development of IEO only means a new trend and gives investors a new way to make profits, and helps developers to accelerate the development of the project, so the ICO will still exist when it still has a little value, want to eliminate will need a new replacement that is more suitable for everyone. 
Topic: Are ICOs dead? - page 13. (Read 20190 times)
According to 60% of the ICO, it will make a profit, there’s a moment in the study of projects, reliable partners of ICO, and time, untwisted, it’s just not realistic to get into some projects ... So it’s alive, but it’s very difficult to enter standing projects .
Although currently there are many project developers who choose to do ieo, but that is not a reason to say if ico will die, because I think not all project developers who like to sell using the ieo system because the amount of big funds that must be spent by the developer to sell ieo in exchanger market, so with so many projects that until now use ico and I think there are still many of the successful ico projects today, but of course investors should be more careful in choosing a project for them to invest so that they are not trapped in the ico or ieo scam.
Recently, on the contrary, I see some activation of ICO projects. By the number of projects it has become not a little more, however, along with fraudulent ones, good projects are increasingly meeting. Therefore, I’m sure that the ICO’s activities are not dying, it may well revive when the market begins to grow and rise. The main difficulty now for ICO projects is the poor state of the cryptocurrency market.
in the bounty thread there are still many ICO projects that have sprung up meaning this indicates that ICO is still needed. yes, I know that there are many cases of ICO project fraud but not all of them are like that.
But most of them looks like a scam/fraud. Even projects that going IEO are getting unsuccessful results, so I think no needed any conversations about ICO projects.yes but not for the whole.
can you give an example of a failed IEO project? I am confused, do you mean to fail to scam / fail because it did not reach the ATH price?
Isn't @OP talking about ICO projects?
ICOs are not dead but they are 1 step behind that.
If this IEO will not survive then it will die along them. we need more project to be successful in IEO and ICO together.
If this will happen then we can have a birghter future, better than 2017!
If this IEO will not survive then it will die along them. we need more project to be successful in IEO and ICO together.
If this will happen then we can have a birghter future, better than 2017!
IEO this is ICO only on the exchange platform. IKO are dead due to the fact that no one uses this type of investment, well, or almost no one.
IEOs are successful, and while the number of participants artificially restricting IEOs will bring income to their investors.
in the bounty thread there are still many ICO projects that have sprung up meaning this indicates that ICO is still needed. yes, I know that there are many cases of ICO project fraud but not all of them are like that.
But most of them looks like a scam/fraud. Even projects that going IEO are getting unsuccessful results, so I think no needed any conversations about ICO projects.yes but not for the whole.
can you give an example of a failed IEO project? I am confused, do you mean to fail to scam / fail because it did not reach the ATH price?
Isn't @OP talking about ICO projects?
in the bounty thread there are still many ICO projects that have sprung up meaning this indicates that ICO is still needed. yes, I know that there are many cases of ICO project fraud but not all of them are like that.
But most of them looks like a scam/fraud. Even projects that going IEO are getting unsuccessful results, so I think no needed any conversations about ICO projects.
in the bounty thread there are still many ICO projects that have sprung up meaning this indicates that ICO is still needed. yes, I know that there are many cases of ICO project fraud but not all of them are like that.
ICOs are not dead but they are 1 step behind that.
If this IEO will not survive then it will die along them. we need more project to be successful in IEO and ICO together.
If this will happen then we can have a birghter future, better than 2017!
If this IEO will not survive then it will die along them. we need more project to be successful in IEO and ICO together.
If this will happen then we can have a birghter future, better than 2017!
ICOs are definitely not dead. I think that people should be glad that the ICO has become small. This means that there are fewer scammers who used to be on the market a lot.
ICO is not dead yet and sometimes there are good ICO projects, but still few people have become interested and even less interested in investing in ICO projects
In general, ICOs, as a form of fundraising, have not died, the requirements for projects that launch ICOs have simply increased. Even now, you can see projects that manage to raise large sums at the ICO. But I think that it depends on the project and the team, because only promising projects with a finished product and partnership agreements with large companies can succeed and raise the necessary amount during the ICO. For low-quality projects, ICOs are dead and most likely IEOs for such projects are also dead.
Being a startup project looking for funds nowadays is so sad, as investors see most icos as scam who do not deliver goals according to their roadmap, but just raises money and get listed on an exchange. I personally believe a none ico project with a good team, may have a better chance at doing well than an ico project
ICO is not regulated, investors are all shifting to IEO's.
IEOs are not regulated as well, but the fact that exchanges are regulated, this is way safer compared to ICO. Though with IEO there are only limited number of projects compared to ICO, but this is still considered a great achievement as we are talking of quality over quantity here.
I don't know if there's still an innovation for crowdsale format in the future, but I feel this IEO will last longer if not forever.
ICO is not regulated, investors are all shifting to IEO's.
Personally, I do not believe ICO's are dead rather many have tuned their mind to IEO's in other to gft acess to ready market, ICO's are still in the market and there are some developers who will still prefer ICO over OEO's and IEO's
ICOs are not fully dead there are still ICO running even IEO is trendy, but many investors are losing confidence to invest in ICO because of many scams in the past year and until now, so they rather go IEO. It is rarely to find a legit project ICO nowadays.
Due to many fake ICO's, many people are afraid to invest in the ICO's and moving their investment to IEO's. From 2018 to till date people lost a huge amount of fund through the ICO's. Now a day, it is very hard to find the legit ICO's for investing.
ICOs are not fully dead there are still ICO running even IEO is trendy, but many investors are losing confidence to invest in ICO because of many scams in the past year and until now, so they rather go IEO. It is rarely to find a legit project ICO nowadays.
ICO is not dead. More precisely there are already many who do not use ICO. Although there are still a few. Investors trust IEO more. Compared to ICO, IEO is far more useful. Moreover, if the IEO conducted on the exchange are already popular. Then, tokens will be sold out in a few minutes.
I agree that ICO is not dead. There are several projects that prefer the ICO path and are able to achieve the target soft cap. Maybe IEO is faster in achieving the target but for new projects that are raising funds, paying exchanger at a high price is a difficult choice for the developer team
Maybe not totally dead but we can agree that ICOs are no longer what it used to be. The only ICO I remember this year which did okay was from Ferrum with a very low cap of 500k usd. Investors and Exchanges now prefer the IEO pattern which offers more security and confidence
ICO is not dead. More precisely there are already many who do not use ICO. Although there are still a few. Investors trust IEO more. Compared to ICO, IEO is far more useful. Moreover, if the IEO conducted on the exchange are already popular. Then, tokens will be sold out in a few minutes.
I agree that ICO is not dead. There are several projects that prefer the ICO path and are able to achieve the target soft cap. Maybe IEO is faster in achieving the target but for new projects that are raising funds, paying exchanger at a high price is a difficult choice for the developer team
Maybe not totally dead but we can agree that ICOs are no longer what it used to be. The only ICO I remember this year which did okay was from Ferrum with a very low cap of 500k usd. Investors and Exchanges now prefer the IEO pattern which offers more security and confidence
Jump to: