Thanks for the update friedcat, as usual, the good news just keep coming in.
Let me address some of your comments, since they deserve an answer.
The PCB production of the main board and the power module has started. For safety the second batch has no changes with respect to the PCB design. ... The deploying of the first batch had met more stagnation since the rewiring for increasing of power capacity of the new place has still been going on since the last week.
From the first day on you've followed a very prudent path to pursue this technology. Not only have you shown proficiency with developing ASIC based bitcoin mining, but also with how to operate it. As a matter of fact I am delighted to see how smooth the deployment went, which gives me confidence that you are on top of things. I am not surprised to see that the community is lining up to become equity holders in your enterprise.
I am looking forward to hear what your post 60 TH plans for the company are (apart from a technological progression). You shouldn't have problems raising new capital after this.
We contribute to the network security as all other miners do. ... ASIC manufactures sell devices to miners. We are both an ASIC manufacture and a miner. Does this make us less useful and more evil than both?
Bitcoin only works if there is a balance of power. As an ASIC supplier you have the moral responsibility to maintain that. This includes yourself as a company - which means you have to prevent yourself from becoming too powerful. I know that sounds odd, but unless you can hit a self-destruct button, you have to account for hostile take overs in your business. You'll see what I mean when you're approached by the first economic hitmen. One way to prevent the accumulation of power is to delegate that power to customers who are willing to compensate for the projected earnings of the corresponding hashing power. However, there are several strategies to accommodate the situation and ideally they should be explored in a revised business plan.
We expect a long-lasting, sharp and harsh difficulty rising therefore this will not likely to be a concern. If it becomes very fortunate for us that the difficulty climbs up slow, selling the devices at that moment at a low price as the current market price is not wise and too early. Refraining the hashpower for several days or weeks may be a better choice.
The current situation is very unpredictable and unstable, which is why I'd give you the benefit of the doubt with your assessment. However, it is the nature of bitcoin that the exact distribution of hashing power cannot be traced to particular entities. Thus, when you say that you "retain" hashing power, people have to take your word for it. In effect this is no different than a promise to not tamper with the blockchain in any malicious way. Given that I understand posts like SebastianJu (
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1605777), where he favors a stealth approach to mining. It is not my place to recommend what the correct procedure for this event may be, but I'd like to provide a fitting quote, which you should apply in such a case: "With great power comes great responsibility".
