Would have been better off with a simple six pin pcie. and a voltage regulator.
Well, yes except that EU REQUIRES the USB-C PD format. Barrel connectors and PCIe are now forbidden on low power stand alone devices.
what is low power 140 watts ?
there is a cut off and it is not low power correct?
so they could have made it a bit higher power say 200 or 250 watts.
or is low power standard stupidly too high like 600 watts?
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20220413STO27211/usb-type-c-to-become-eu-s-common-charger-by-end-of-2024this above does not answer the question still looking.
this below mentions 100 watts as top end
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/698819/EPRS_BRI(2021)698819_EN.pdfi know that the nano does over 100 watts.
So i need to find a higher standard. I thought it was bumped to 230 watts
which would mean the nano would need to pull 250 watts to qualify for a pcie power supply.
still looking for that watt number in an official document.
kept looking and found
https://wandkey.com/usb-pd-3-1-vs-pd-3-0-vs-pd-2-0/which talks about pd-3.1 over usb c as much as 240 watts.
so a 260 watt nano with lower speeds option could have used 2 pcie power jacks. or the new adapter 12 pin jack
could have been sold . and if it runs too loud just set it to a lower speed.
and easy peasy legal run around the stupid eu rule. as a 24 /7 / 365 unit running on usb c is moron.
this is an adapter that works with just about all atx psu’s
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08MZRVJWC/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?smid=A3KOUHYUNS6C1J&psc=1we would have been better off with a unit just over the 240 watt standard of usb-c pd 3.1
but no.
I run my two units at mid speed they still hang in there well.
but one 260 watt unit using an atx would have suited me fine.
btw they would have had no psu shortage issues my way.
this one below would run two of them especially if you drop power down to midspeed.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B073H33X7R/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1