Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 491. (Read 703113 times)

Hello,

This software is really great. Could it be possible to implement XMRIG (https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig) for CPU mining? This miner is fastest on many CPUs. It has his own API:

https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig/wiki/API

It’s only thing I miss

Thanks

If anyone has any input on what would be the optimal profit switching time, I created a poll here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/optimal-pool-switching-time-for-max-profit-2568035

It's already down 4 pages in a few hours so feel free to comment

I'm also still hoping for some feedback on what profit factors make sense for the built-in profit switching pools. I asked about this a few hours ago too but I don't think I got any replies. I just set zpool to 0.85 for now. I'm hoping the others are all in the 98-99% range and can be left alone.

That reminds me, HashRefinery's most popular pool is neoscrypt which isn't even in there by default. Might want to add that in the next version, although manually adding it in is pretty easy.

Go to options, managed software, add, type whatever for name and set compatability mode to full, choose ccminer.
Edit or clone a profit profile, enable the new software and 'configure' the path from there.

Hi guys,

I am new to using Awesome Miner here and run into some really weird glitch (?) Hopefully someone can please help me out


I have several miners set up to mine ETH in Nanopool. I wanted to mine into 2 separate wallets (some of the rigs are for my friend's while some are mine.) I created 2 pools and assign miners to them accordingly - say pool1 and pool2.

When miner is "stopped", the pool name shows up correctly under miner tab. However, once I start the miner, for some reason, the display names all changed to a display pool1. Seems like this is only a display error on Awesome miner because when I check on Nanopool, it seems to be mining into correct wallet.

Am I doing something wrong? Has anyone had this before?

Thank you in advance, guys!

The statistics in AM come from whattomine, and are based on the current point in time.  When you mine on an online service such as Zpool, they are only showing you estimated earnings.  An online service like Zpool will collect the coins you and a hundred other miners mine, and send them to an exchange where they may or may not make as much BTC as the Zpool estimated earnings.  This is simply to do with timing.  Whattomine has always been a guide and not a guaranteed pay out rate.

If you look in the zpool web page and look up those addresses... do you see a balance on there?  If so, then there is a minimum of 0.001 BTC required before zpool will send a payment to your BTC address, and it will only do that on Sundays.  If you have 0.025 then it will be paid out once every few evenings.  If you have 0.01 then it gets paid out every couple of hours.

What the pools report and what the mining software reports are often out of sync... this isn't an AM problem.  The miner software is reporting the most accurate hashrate, and the pool guesses the hashrate based upon the number of nonce submissions over a certain amount of time.

You have to define the pools in the ASIC web interface, then AM can change the priority of the pool to do the switching.

Maybe I'm not understanding the problem here.  The template does not append the name.  The pool and miner define the name.  The pool provides the prefix, and the miner provides the rig name... like "puwaha.rig1"  The "puwaha" part comes from the worker name in the pool, and the ".rig1" comes from the miner.  The template just marries the pool to the rig.  Templates are meant for quickly switching to another pool or coin quickly... it's not meant for profit miners.

Am I misreading the question?

Certainly.  You setup a pool for VTC and Mona, put them in a pool group, then set the profit switching to use that pool group.  AM will switch between the two depending on which is more profitable with a profit miner.

I think this would be very difficult for a rule to do... even if such a trigger was available.  The exchange rate of BTC fluctuates constantly, and AM is just displaying the current value of your coin as reported by Whattomine or the online services.  If the price of BTC tanks below your threshold, then you would trigger a different pool, when maybe your coin wasn't affected by BTC/USD exchange rate.

If you really wanted this action, then you might be able to program it via the C#/API interfaces in AM.

If I'm misreading your question, let me know.

If you would allows us a custom field option so that you parse the variable in it like if the result from an api get balance is
give us an option to put in a field the following:

So that you we users (who aren't necessarily dumb),
could put the single variable in a string match that your app looks for in the output from the URL API result
Parse whatever takes the place of the variable, sanitize it,
and boom! you now have balance... from ANY API service.
Sure that kinda would be a power user feature... just don't allow this feature for free users, have it be another incentive to upgrade.
I'm a premium user because of the performance tracking feature.
It would make me really happy to be able to add any coin balance via some random API with your App.
And it can be easily done with the way I've described above...
I've messed with php scripts that do the above before.
You're really talented, I'm sure you could add such a feature to your app over a coffee break!

edit:
It would also be really awesome if the docs were a bit more fleshed out.
For example I haven't been able to find the option to select a path to add a custom flavor of CCminer I have on my hard drive next to your app.
I want to be able to use custom flavors of ccminer to specific pools.
I can add pools just fine.. just don't see any path selection option when trying to add another miner program to the list of managed programs in Awesome miner.

Hello. Something wrong with the profit switching? I have gtx1070+gtx1060 and just tried Awesome Miner on zpool for 24h. The AM chose nist5, blake, sometimes neoscrypt and reported profit up to $11 for my tiny rig. Not bad, right? But statistics on zpool was disappointing: about $2,17 per day in BTC. Is this an AM mislead in profit swithing? Or is this a zpool manipulation?

Awesome post!

Would just like a small clarification in regards to the displayed estimated earnings found on the miners tab in awesome miner. This estimation is based off your hash rate * miningpoolhub BTC/gh values and whattomine.

In terms of profit switching, is this performed only based on the hub you have selected correct?

thank you for your detailed answer and link below, now everything is clear for me.
One more thing, as you might know I maintain and manage several small-medium-large data centers around the country. I advised some of my clients to buy your software and some of them already did, for some others I need to make some kind of introduction/presentation. It's hard for them to understand why and for what are they paying 600$+. 1. If it is possible to resell your software. 2. If you have some kind of presentation already which I can translate and show to my investors.
Regards
and take your time : )

So I think I might know why my profitability numbers are "off", but not sure how to fix it in AM.

When looking at the miners tab, the Per Day / Per Month numbers seem to be based off the 5s hashrate instead of the WU hashrate.  Since my 5s hashrate is much higher than what the pool shows my hashrate as (which I realize they calculate based on share submission rate), that seems to cause AM to have an inflated amount of revenue/profit.

How can I reconfigure AM to use the WU hashrate instead of the 5s hashrate for revenue/profit?  If it matters, these are Innosilicon A4 ASICs

Below are pics that show the AM stats and the matching pool stats.

https://i.imgur.com/mowcsxN.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/e2WVSaH.jpg

hi Patrike
but could you add to the console data on the balance of the wallet on the zpool, Hashrefinery in the API
this command looks like this http://www.zpool.ca/api/wallet?address=WALLET_ADDRESS

ALL my miners have chosen to mine Nist5 for the past 14 hours. Should have pulled in about $60 but Zpool says I have earned $2.98. Not sure if the problem is with Awesome Miner for choosing Nist5, or if the problem is at Zpool. Any other Zpoolers having trouble making earnings the past 24hr?

wow...so many questions and not much in the way of answers.  

I am a sad panda.  

if someone is up to answering...is there a way to get realistic reports on production/profit? the figures showing in the app do not match anything near what the pools show in their wallets. it'a quite the deficit. my six 1070's were showing about $5 each/day, but after a day, pool wallet reports are just over $10 total. $30 expected to $10 actual is quite the differential and upsettingly misleading.   

Today the feature is only looking at your coin address (Bitcoin, Litecoin, ...) and display the balance of it using public Block Explorers. See:
http://www.awesomeminer.com/help/coinbalance.aspx

The plan for the future is of course to improve it to show your balance from zpool, Mining Pool Hub and so on.