Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 150. (Read 1210749 times)

Thanks, can you tell me which one you are running? I've seen a crash with the cudaminer when hitting a low difficulty share. I think I might have a fix, but haven't tested enough since a real low difficulty share doesn't happen very often.

Oh, looking at the screenshot, I guess it's the cudaminer. Any issues since last night?

Edit: I actually submitted a fix. It should reconnect instead of crash now.

Another thing that would be a nice addition would be the GPU solo mining with the daemon like MBK has implemented https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl   https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8339439

 

+1

Escort or multisig would be very nice, for example I want to sell my AMD 5870 for 5000 BBR, payment made but locked until delivery received by buyer, maybe signed by courier to unlock it or by escort service (third party) with all document proof.

I think DB implementation is a good starting point.  Another feature that would be nice would be the ability to change the wallet password on current wallets.  Boolberry has Aliases and there isn't any method that I'm aware of to change the password on those unique wallets.  Going forward it would be nice to have a mnemonic seed generated with new wallets so you could change the password by using the mnemonic seed to recreate the wallet.

 

Ok. I got it, now it is running here is the screenshot https://www.sendspace.com/file/duwwb1

Looks stable. Lets see tomorrow.

Sorry, you would need to

I also now have an opencl version ready to test.



These should help if your miner disconnects after a while of not submitting shares.

I tried to git clone but these errors occur :
Welcome to Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS (GNU/Linux 2.6.32-042stab094.7 x86_64)

root@server2:~# git clone https://github.com/clintar/bbr-cudaminer/tree/keepalive
Cloning into 'keepalive'...
fatal: repository 'https://github.com/clintar/bbr-cudaminer/tree/keepalive/' not found
root@server2:~#

Great questions. I don't have complete answers yet. PM me if you'd like and we can perhaps chat on skype in more detail. Cheers.

Jon

I've implemented Onishin's keepalive miner function to https://bbr.cncoin.farm if anyone would like to test the miner it for me, I'd appreciate it.

You can get it at https://github.com/clintar/bbr-cudaminer/tree/keepalive and let me know if you get any issues. Any takers? I've got a cpu miner I haven't pushed yet, too. I'll get to that tomorrow.

It's just supposed to ping the server every once in a while so it doesn't time out and disconnect. You use the -K (capital K) option to enable the keepalive.

LOL man all I said was that CLAMS was a total shitcoin and it won't pass the level of 0.003 ever again, while everyone was expecting to do so. I gave the fair value of clams (0.0007-0.0008) and I left from that shithole.

Result: After three months of intense pumping of everything, CLAMS has moved to 0.0025-0.003 to 0.0015-0.002, without surpassing 0.003 level ever again. Nice progression man, but still overvaluated.

To BBR people: BBR is the best cryptonote outthere, the only thing necessary is a visible dev team, a visible promotion team, and a rise on prices. Don't worry about third point, it will happen. In fact is very very easy to "ressurrect" this coin.

Db implementation and a "fully enhanced anonymous transaction wallet" sound like a good starting point to get development back on track. What would be useful (for a non-technical person like me) is a couple of paragraphs from either CZ or the new dev explaining the benefits of these new features and the gaps they plug.

What would also be useful is to understand whether there are any other deficiencies in the existing code base/ design that would prohibit scalability of the coin or undermine the anonymity of transactions? If there are, it would be good to address these as a priority on the roadmap.

Seeing something tangible from the Dev team (like a new code release) would go a long way to regaining the trust and getting more engagement from "the community" IMO.

Now a few questions:

1) What enhanced features will be brought across from Lui?

2) Will CZ return to BBR after Lui launches? People invest in people. IMO CZ is key to the success of BBR as things stand so it would be good to know where he stands in relation to BBR.

3) When is Lui launching? Looking at that thread there appear to have been a few false starts. It would be good to know as the availability of new features and CZ seem dependent on it. 

4) Who is the new dev? Will he work alongside CZ (now and when/ if CZ returns)? It would be good if he popped by to say hi.

5) Is serious consideration being given to improving communication, marketing and PR? It's been piss poor over the last year or so. It is not realistic to expect people to invest money, time and energy into a coin (or to attract new investment) when there is zero information coming back from the dev team. No one expects detailed updates every week, however some kind of communication once a month or once a quarter would not be unreasonable. If not on this thread then on the Boolberry website.  

6) Speaking of the website, has any consideration be given to updating it? A good lick of paint and keeping it up-to-date would go a long way to giving the right first impression to new potential investors.

Thanks

Well, here is the deal. Crypto Zoidberg was the original and only real dev on this project. For the last year or more he has been paid to develop a new cryptonote currency called Lui, that is still in development. He has not had the time to add on to the BBR project during this time.

I have had recent discussions with CZ and he has intimated to me that once Lui is launched he is interested in bringing enhanced features to BBR, some of which he is developing for Lui. Meanwhile he recommended to me another cryptonote developer that he says is highly skilled. I have spoken to this gentleman who has expressed interest. However this developer wanted clear directions from the community about where we wanted to take BBR. I posted a request for community feedback a week or so ago, but so far the only response I received on here was from a couple of Monero trolls that for some reason still read this thread.

I am just a messenger. But its up to the community what we want to do. I am willing to help, but I can't do it on my own.

Jon

Hi all, I just want to share easiest way to compile bbr-cudaminer.

1. Get cheap vps, openvz vps with 256 MB RAM with 5GB storage is just fine.
2. Install cuda-toolkit 7.5 on vps, set the environment.
3. Git clone the bbr-cudaminer and edit miner.h to increase scratchpad size, find the line contain 64<<20 change to 64<<24
4. make
5. tar -cvf the bbr-cudaminer folder name it as you like
6. scp the file to your linux machine the filesize is around 3.5MB
7. tar -xvf the file to extract the folder, and ready to mine BBR with fullspeed using your NVIDIA gtx 750ti

Nine days until this threads two year anniversary. Congrats!

Hi all

This dude is a total wanker I first saw his posts over on the Clam thread, He made all sorts of predictions/threats about price. He finally left after losing the bet and proving that his predictions where shit. He carried on

about making hundreds of BTC per month with his pump & dump crew. Do yourselves a favor and ignore him, there's even a little button under his name to help with that.

Cheers Jon  
 

Gentleman, party starts here at may-june.

BBR is planned to be the VTC 2.0 mega-pump of 2016.

It would be great to have a visible team and some promotion to new users so the price can stabilize at 20K-30K after the mega-pump, and not come back ever again at these ridiculous prices!!

The pump is 100% assured, my bet is that it will touch 130K-150K.

Not kidding, this is exactly the same as VTC last year. Look at charts and general situation of both coins, and you'll know what I mean.

Hi! BBR is a very interesting project, but I am afraid that without a robust dev team it will never take off.

Interesting to learn over the last 2 year that dev team is just as important as solid tech.

With BBR being part of supernet and all that, it could have a real pole position.

Anybody have any ideas on how to tie together an outwardly visible dev team?

I don't know the details so correct me if I am wrong, but did Zoidberg step in to BBR after original dev had left, or did he write it himself?

Would be nice to motivate him and a few others to do more consistent stuff, nobody will buy this without such.

Did I leave?

Don't worry windjc is back.

The silence here is deafening. Start contrast to the 2014 BBR glory days.

I hope the community can come together and build from here.