[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 164.

boolberry

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on December 15, 2015, 01:57:35 PM

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on December 15, 2015, 10:13:19 AM

Are there any Boolberry payment processing services?

Not that I am aware of. I would love to see one accept Boolberry.

It would be easier to attract payment service providers if:

1. Our trading volume was higher
2. More merchants accepted Boolberry

We need to attract more users. With a larger community #1 and #2 above will be easier and then shapeshift.io and others are more likely to support us.

LucyLovesCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 414

Merit: 251

Quote from: bitcoinrocks on December 15, 2015, 10:13:19 AM

Are there any Boolberry payment processing services?

Not that I am aware of. I would love to see one accept Boolberry.

bitcoinrocks

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1000

Are there any Boolberry payment processing services?

boolberry

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Does anyone in the community own or work for a business that would be willing to accept Boolberry?

boolberry

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: languagehasmeaning on December 10, 2015, 02:08:40 AM

Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on December 10, 2015, 12:51:58 AM

Quote from: shojayxt on December 07, 2015, 11:57:47 PM

Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on December 06, 2015, 01:38:31 AM

crypto_zoidberg,

It would be nice if you stopped by more often to tell us what you are working on. I think more people here would like to help but feel like they are out of the information loop.

Best regards

Yes it would but I wouldn't hold out too much hope for any kind of sudden reappearance from crypto_zoidberg with magical keys to the kingdom. Even if they were to return with gusto just what exactly are they going to do? The current environment with crypto is not conducive to coins with great tech and a great dev. The environment is still centered on vaporware, false promises, and scams. There are few avenues for legitimate coins offering new technology to break through the quick pump and dump mentality that currently permeates the entire altcoin world. It's a frustrating reality that isn't likely to change anytime soon.

What do you propose the Boolberry community should do to help?

damashup is a good example of someone doing the right thing. Build businesses and services to support and promote Boolberry usage.

I agree about popboolr.com

There is no need to wait on CryptoZoidberg. The coin functions well already and has some very innovative features and a nice GUI. Lets build services to attract more users and merchants who care about privacy to Boolberry!

languagehasmeaning

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on December 10, 2015, 12:51:58 AM

Quote from: shojayxt on December 07, 2015, 11:57:47 PM

Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on December 06, 2015, 01:38:31 AM

crypto_zoidberg,

It would be nice if you stopped by more often to tell us what you are working on. I think more people here would like to help but feel like they are out of the information loop.

Best regards

Yes it would but I wouldn't hold out too much hope for any kind of sudden reappearance from crypto_zoidberg with magical keys to the kingdom. Even if they were to return with gusto just what exactly are they going to do? The current environment with crypto is not conducive to coins with great tech and a great dev. The environment is still centered on vaporware, false promises, and scams. There are few avenues for legitimate coins offering new technology to break through the quick pump and dump mentality that currently permeates the entire altcoin world. It's a frustrating reality that isn't likely to change anytime soon.

What do you propose the Boolberry community should do to help?

damashup is a good example of someone doing the right thing. Build businesses and services to support and promote Boolberry usage.

LucyLovesCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 414

Merit: 251

Quote from: shojayxt on December 07, 2015, 11:57:47 PM

Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on December 06, 2015, 01:38:31 AM

crypto_zoidberg,

It would be nice if you stopped by more often to tell us what you are working on. I think more people here would like to help but feel like they are out of the information loop.

Best regards

Yes it would but I wouldn't hold out too much hope for any kind of sudden reappearance from crypto_zoidberg with magical keys to the kingdom. Even if they were to return with gusto just what exactly are they going to do? The current environment with crypto is not conducive to coins with great tech and a great dev. The environment is still centered on vaporware, false promises, and scams. There are few avenues for legitimate coins offering new technology to break through the quick pump and dump mentality that currently permeates the entire altcoin world. It's a frustrating reality that isn't likely to change anytime soon.

What do you propose the Boolberry community should do to help?

languagehasmeaning

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: fernforest on December 08, 2015, 10:52:35 PM

Boolberry is probably the most underappreciated coin. It also has the best name.

Thank you for honoring us with your first bitcointalk post.

fernforest

newbie

Activity: 40

Merit: 0

Boolberry is probably the most underappreciated coin. It also has the best name.

LucyLovesCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 414

Merit: 251

Quote from: shojayxt on December 07, 2015, 11:57:47 PM

Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on December 06, 2015, 01:38:31 AM

crypto_zoidberg,

It would be nice if you stopped by more often to tell us what you are working on. I think more people here would like to help but feel like they are out of the information loop.

Best regards

Yes it would but I wouldn't hold out too much hope for any kind of sudden reappearance from crypto_zoidberg with magical keys to the kingdom. Even if they were to return with gusto just what exactly are they going to do? The current environment with crypto is not conducive to coins with great tech and a great dev. The environment is still centered on vaporware, false promises, and scams. There are few avenues for legitimate coins offering new technology to break through the quick pump and dump mentality that currently permeates the entire altcoin world. It's a frustrating reality that isn't likely to change anytime soon.

It is indeed sad to see so many scams in crypto. The only good news is that people will be cautious in the future and look at the tech being used instead of believing promises and closed sourced vaporware projects. This is good for Boolberry as its CryptoNote implementation holds up well to scrutiny, but we need to bring more attention to it.

shojayxt

legendary

Activity: 896

Merit: 1001

Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on December 06, 2015, 01:38:31 AM

crypto_zoidberg,

It would be nice if you stopped by more often to tell us what you are working on. I think more people here would like to help but feel like they are out of the information loop.

Best regards

Yes it would but I wouldn't hold out too much hope for any kind of sudden reappearance from crypto_zoidberg with magical keys to the kingdom. Even if they were to return with gusto just what exactly are they going to do? The current environment with crypto is not conducive to coins with great tech and a great dev. The environment is still centered on vaporware, false promises, and scams. There are few avenues for legitimate coins offering new technology to break through the quick pump and dump mentality that currently permeates the entire altcoin world. It's a frustrating reality that isn't likely to change anytime soon.

boolberry

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: Este Nuno on December 07, 2015, 06:07:20 AM

This might not be an issue at all, but gmaxwell seems to imply here that there might be a vulnerability in the way segregated witness is implemented in BBR:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3vq8hm/multiple_new_bip_proposals_coming_up_on_day_2_of/cxpxi5t

Quote from: boolberry on December 07, 2015, 08:10:04 PM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on December 07, 2015, 07:57:07 AM

Quote from: funnyman21 on December 07, 2015, 06:34:06 AM

Quote from: Este Nuno on December 07, 2015, 06:07:20 AM

This might not be an issue at all, but gmaxwell seems to imply here that there might be a vulnerability in the way segregated witness is implemented in BBR:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3vq8hm/multiple_new_bip_proposals_coming_up_on_day_2_of/cxpxi5t

Is this something to be worried about? Does it potentially impact other CryptoNote coins or just Boolberry?

All they are saying there is that if you want to prune the signature data, you need to still keep a hash of the signature data in the chain of hashes (of Merkle trees) for the blocks. In other words, you need to still be able to prove which signature signed which transaction, even if you've actually discarded the signature data.

I believe BBR already does the correct thing. And afaik, Monero does not discard signature data, but I could be wrong about that. If they do, I assume they would do the right thing as well.

Any way, I as I read into the proposals more, I realized they are adopting some of the ideas I've had privately, but bolting these onto Bitcoin's legacy limits their flexibility in terms of optimum choices and especially speed to market. Bitcoin is looking more and more like design Rigor Mortis (they even need to abandon ECDSA to totally rectify malleability) and needs to be scrapped and start over again.

Wuille wrote this technical summary in way that can only really be understood by other core devs or experts who have their head deep in these issues. He sounds rushed.

http://boolberry.com/downloads.html
Blockchain proof
Full blockchain for windows(with all ring signatures):
http://boolberry.com/downloads/windows/blockchain_full.bin

funnyman21

member

Activity: 109

Merit: 10

Quote from: Este Nuno on December 07, 2015, 06:07:20 AM

This might not be an issue at all, but gmaxwell seems to imply here that there might be a vulnerability in the way segregated witness is implemented in BBR:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3vq8hm/multiple_new_bip_proposals_coming_up_on_day_2_of/cxpxi5t

I would like to here more specifics about the meaning and importance of this.

Este Nuno

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1002

amarha

This might not be an issue at all, but gmaxwell seems to imply here that there might be a vulnerability in the way segregated witness is implemented in BBR:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3vq8hm/multiple_new_bip_proposals_coming_up_on_day_2_of/cxpxi5t

LucyLovesCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 414

Merit: 251

crypto_zoidberg,

It would be nice if you stopped by more often to tell us what you are working on. I think more people here would like to help but feel like they are out of the information loop.

Best regards

languagehasmeaning

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: clintar2 on December 03, 2015, 11:01:53 PM

Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on December 03, 2015, 10:09:05 PM

Quote from: clintar2 on December 03, 2015, 04:43:37 PM

Just a warning to miners, you may have to update scratchpad sizes. I have miners connecting and not submitting shares. I noticed my nvidia miner had a scratchpad issue and it's probably happening to everyone using that if they updated the scratchpad size to be

Code:

64<<21

We have reached the point past that. You will need to change that, so probably

Code:

64<<22

Thank you for telling us this but can you explain in more detail what the meaning of this is and how we change the code exactly?

in the source for wolf's miner, edit the file miner.h and find the line

Code:

#define WILD_KECCAK_SCRATCHPAD_BUFFSIZE  (64<<20)

It might say <<21 if you have previously edited it last time the scratchpad size got too big. Change it to be 64<<22, save the file and rebuild. Usually that just means typing make. then run your miner as usual.

Quote from: clintar2 on October 14, 2015, 02:19:43 PM

Quote from: yassin54 on October 14, 2015, 09:45:49 AM

hi all
i have donwload BBR here: http://boolberry.com/downloads.html
but i can not Synchronized my wallet, i have this:

Someone else had this problem the other day. Here's what got them working.
Right-click on the shortcut, click properties and add this after the filename

Code:

 --add-priority-node 66.228.33.249:10101 --add-priority-node 59.120.166.36:10101 --add-priority-node 62.201.213.25:10101 --add-priority-node 95.85.21.33:10101 --add-priority-node 107.170.97.197:10101

These type of posts will likely help a lot of people. It would be nice if they could be added to a FAQ or troubleshooting section of Boolberry.com

clintar2

full member

Activity: 202

Merit: 104

Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on December 03, 2015, 10:09:05 PM

Quote from: clintar2 on December 03, 2015, 04:43:37 PM

Just a warning to miners, you may have to update scratchpad sizes. I have miners connecting and not submitting shares. I noticed my nvidia miner had a scratchpad issue and it's probably happening to everyone using that if they updated the scratchpad size to be

Code:

64<<21

We have reached the point past that. You will need to change that, so probably

Code:

64<<22

Thank you for telling us this but can you explain in more detail what the meaning of this is and how we change the code exactly?

in the source for wolf's miner, edit the file miner.h and find the line

Code:

#define WILD_KECCAK_SCRATCHPAD_BUFFSIZE  (64<<20)

It might say <<21 if you have previously edited it last time the scratchpad size got too big. Change it to be 64<<22, save the file and rebuild. Usually that just means typing make. then run your miner as usual.

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on December 03, 2015, 10:09:05 PM

Quote from: clintar2 on December 03, 2015, 04:43:37 PM

Just a warning to miners, you may have to update scratchpad sizes. I have miners connecting and not submitting shares. I noticed my nvidia miner had a scratchpad issue and it's probably happening to everyone using that if they updated the scratchpad size to be

Code:

64<<21

We have reached the point past that. You will need to change that, so probably

Code:

64<<22

Thank you for telling us this but can you explain in more detail what the meaning of this is

The PoW algorithm uses some data from each block as a scratchpad (memory accessed in the process of computing the hash value). As the blockchain gets longer this scratchpad gets bigger.

Quote

and how we change the code exactly?

I'll leave that to others who know the code better.

LucyLovesCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 414

Merit: 251

Quote from: clintar2 on December 03, 2015, 04:43:37 PM

Just a warning to miners, you may have to update scratchpad sizes. I have miners connecting and not submitting shares. I noticed my nvidia miner had a scratchpad issue and it's probably happening to everyone using that if they updated the scratchpad size to be

Code:

64<<21

We have reached the point past that. You will need to change that, so probably

Code:

64<<22

Thank you for telling us this but can you explain in more detail what the meaning of this is and how we change the code exactly?

clintar2

full member

Activity: 202

Merit: 104

Just a warning to miners, you may have to update scratchpad sizes. I have miners connecting and not submitting shares. I noticed my nvidia miner had a scratchpad issue and it's probably happening to everyone using that if they updated the scratchpad size to be

Code:

64<<21

We have reached the point past that. You will need to change that, so probably

Code:

64<<22

Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 164. (Read 1210779 times)