I have done this kind of experiment in the past and failed. Hopefully, you'll succeed so you can prove that this method works. Now, I'm more interested in betting on high odds, like 2.50 but not over 4.00. I haven't been able to draw a conclusion yet since I haven't consistently used this strategy; it’s just side betting when I feel bored or want some extra action. My main strategy is still focused on odds of at least 2.00, so I’ll aim to take 100% of my winnings.
Following this thread.
Topic: Betting experiment with low odds on football main leagues - page 7. (Read 1585 times)
Fast forward, Round 1!
6 matches
Total Stake Est. Payout
6.0 7.98
The number of picks for me is getting too long from when it got beyond three picks making your winning chances slimmer than a three game picks would do. What am saying is that if I were to go by this strategy follow your size of odds I would making sure to settle on not more than three games per bet.6 matches
Total Stake Est. Payout
6.0 7.98
Hence your option of matches as selected in the image appears to be good choice but don't forget that in every weekend one or two of those elite teams does pay the sacrifice of losing to the average team. However, let see how consistent it's goes for you in the future with the strategy
As the betting slip is getting long as you accumulate more, the chance to win will be reducing.
The experiment won't run on multipliers, but on individuals I had them selected like that because it was easier to rid.
Each bet will be on an individual game, 6 bets this round with 1 unit on each.
Multiplier at those low odds makes little sense to me honestly, way too risky for way too little.
Lateredit, now that I look again, one match lost even in single and you barely make 0.5, so maybe the multi is not as bad as I thought.
To me this could be very hard to secure winning, the above matches you picked play much more of "Over 1.5"
It's under 1.5 odds for the team to win, I'm not going for goals
The experiment is pretty simple,
- Each Thursday-Friday I pick all matches from 5 leagues in which a team is under 1.5 to win (odds from Stake
)Good luck mate, don't forget to update this thread here.
As the betting slip is getting long as you accumulate more, the chance to win will be reducing. It might not be in this bet but other bets. I guess going for 1.5 weekly would be good. You can get that from 2 or 3 matches.
I like the match that you selected this week but I do not think this would be good in long term. I will keep following this thread and see the results.
This is a good thread.
I like the match that you selected this week but I do not think this would be good in long term. I will keep following this thread and see the results.
This is a good thread.
It all started from this thread with a gambler considering on betting exactly on 1.50 odds 3 times a week.
I thought this would be an inclusive experiment since it would be about fixed odds and cherry-picked matches, pretty much gambling on what matches to gamble, which leads to a lot of bias in the results, then, how about betting on all football matches from 5 leagues, only on the favorite under 1.5 to win, would those "sure" lol, prove to be easy money or an easy money pit that grows with each week played? My experience with betting on the favorite in horse racing tells me the latter, but who knows?
The experiment is pretty simple,
- Each Thursday-Friday I pick all matches from 5 leagues in which a team is under 1.5 to win (odds from Stake)
- A bet is considered at 1 unit, so a loss is -1 , a win at 1.25 is +0.25
- The game will stop at -100, if we reach that point I think it's obvious the strategy is flawed to the max
Fast forward, Round 1!
LE:
Because too many are confused about the screenshot,no, it's not a multiplier, I just added them to save space.
Each bet is on an individual match!
6 matches
Total Stake Est. Payout
6.0 7.98
Update:
Since there is so much talk about multipliers I will track this too, for the 6 games above: Total Odds 5.59.
This will be done independently from the single bets.
Round 1 results
- Individual bets balance +0.27
- Multiplier balance -1
I thought this would be an inclusive experiment since it would be about fixed odds and cherry-picked matches, pretty much gambling on what matches to gamble, which leads to a lot of bias in the results, then, how about betting on all football matches from 5 leagues, only on the favorite under 1.5 to win, would those "sure" lol, prove to be easy money or an easy money pit that grows with each week played? My experience with betting on the favorite in horse racing tells me the latter, but who knows?
The experiment is pretty simple,
- Each Thursday-Friday I pick all matches from 5 leagues in which a team is under 1.5 to win (odds from Stake
)- A bet is considered at 1 unit, so a loss is -1 , a win at 1.25 is +0.25
- The game will stop at -100, if we reach that point I think it's obvious the strategy is flawed to the max
Fast forward, Round 1!
LE:
Because too many are confused about the screenshot,no, it's not a multiplier, I just added them to save space.
Each bet is on an individual match!
6 matches
Total Stake Est. Payout
6.0 7.98
Update:
Since there is so much talk about multipliers I will track this too, for the 6 games above: Total Odds 5.59.
This will be done independently from the single bets.
Round 1 results
- Individual bets balance +0.27
- Multiplier balance -1
Jump to: